Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (54)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Does Expansion Actually Lead to More Recruits From a Certain Region?
    maizeonblueaction - 16 hours ago
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 1 day ago
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 3 days ago
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 3 days ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 4 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 910 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 796 views
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    blueheron - 772 views
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 720 views
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 604 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 4-30-13
    Ace - 81 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 19 comments
  • A Cynical Take on Why Expansion May be Dead for the Forseeable Future
    maizeonblueaction - 18 comments
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 17 comments
  • Raiding the B1G-er Big Ten: Recruiting Prospects in Maryland and Rutgers Territory
    The Mathlete - 13 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    2 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    5 replies
  • Michigan/Minnesota football - Oct 5 - 330 pm EST
    8 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    104 replies
  • The Official SIAP Alan Branch Photoshop Thread
    23 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    53 replies
  • OT: Star Trek + Dilithium = Esplode…. Esplode clarity
    25 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    32 replies
  • Softball SuperRegionals Open Thread
    24 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    38 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  • Mark May Trolls Ohio State Again, Buckeyes Fans Let Him Have It On Twitter
    38 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    143 replies
  • Baseball Eliminated from B1G
    20 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    56 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • There should be 110,000 Rubber Chickens at the ND Game
    2 replies
  • OT - ND paid Charlie more than Brian Kelly in 2012
    32 replies
  • The Official SIAP Alan Branch Photoshop Thread
    23 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    152 replies
  • OT- Miguel Cabrera is good at baseball, visual proof
    5 replies
  • Michigan/Minnesota football - Oct 5 - 330 pm EST
    8 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    104 replies
  • Which Pay Site Is Best?
    53 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    143 replies
  • Mark May Trolls Ohio State Again, Buckeyes Fans Let Him Have It On Twitter
    38 replies
  • Very OT: The Hangover 3 *Thread May Contain Spoilers*
    62 replies
  • Urbs and his obsession with butts
    53 replies
  • OT: ESPN hires Paul Finebaum
    38 replies
  • Softball SuperRegionals Open Thread
    24 replies
  • Denard, other rookies discuss Star Trek
    56 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    203 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 4 Open Thread
    193 replies
  • OT - Official MGoBaby Thread (you got 'em, we want to see 'em)
    151 replies
  • Scouting Report: Jabrill Peppers
    151 replies
  • How much do you really hate ohio?
    145 replies
  • Who should replace ND in a long-term series?
    143 replies
  • OT? Graduatin' Season. Who had the Worst Commencement Speaker?
    141 replies
  • Speight and TomVH on Peppers
    116 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    112 replies
  • Memorial Day Weekend (here for the) posbang thread
    104 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    92 replies
  • OT: NBA Draft Lottery
    78 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 6
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Burke says Michigan can be 'just as good' next year with McGary, Robinson III leading

    yes plz

    0 comments
  • SEC coaches with tiny faces

    I don't think they changed Les at all actually

    0 comments
  • This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews

    national champs baby

    1 comments
  • Rounding up the latest in NCAA absurdities.

    Patrick Hruby is doing God's work.

    0 comments
  • Cornell wrestler tops Michigan's Trey Burke for Sports Illustrated award | The Detroit News | detroitnews.com

    first comment: "EVERY ATHLETE HAS ASPIRATIONS OF WINNING AND WE HAVE OUR FAVORITES BUT IT IS ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO OTHER STUDENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS, TOO!"

    0 comments
  • Burke hearing he'll go two through six in NBA draft

    stupid Pistons and their refusal to tank properly

    0 comments
  • 2013 NHL Draft Prospect: Andrew Copp

    rundown of Michigan's riser

    0 comments
  • Michigan's key returnee: Glenn Robinson

    needs moar usage

    0 comments
  • Former Arkansas QB Brandon Mitchell transferring to NC State

    so much for that

    0 comments
  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    2 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

2011 Football Season-Wins/Losses

113 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
April 20th, 2011 at 3:31 PM | Illinois is a toss-up? (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

Illinois is a toss-up? They'll have less talent, less experience and worse coaching than us. They had 2 really good defensive players last year that kept them in games, and they'll both be gone to the NFL.

I'm not saying it's a given, but not a toss-up. If Illinois beats us it will be a decent upset, IMO.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:07 PM | Yeah, but it's a rivalry game (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2907

Yeah, but it's a rivalry game...at least it is to Illinois.

/s

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:37 PM | They also lost their RB, did (Score:1)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

They also lost their RB, did they not?

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:19 PM | 8-4 (Score:1)
Crime Reporter
Crime Reporter's picture
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8048

Anything less, with this (offensive) talent would be unacceptable.

Christ in me arise and dispel all the darkness.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:19 PM | So your saying (Score:1)
smitty1233
Joined: 09/22/2009
MGoPoints: 3

So your saying theres a chance???

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:33 PM | I'll (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

I'll say 8-4

Another New Year's Day Bowl. Hopefully a win there for 9-4

Couple of things to note............peeps are looking past Northwestern. Except in CFB, teams that start with 5 straight home games, tend to suck ass when they finally hit the road for the first time. That's a total trap game with MSU on deck. Not saying we lose to NW, but I am saying we drop a fourth in a row to Sparty. We'll stumble somewhere else. And, I by no means put any ND game in the victory column. In fact, after the last seasons, we might get some karma repaid to us in that series.

I'm thinking 8-2 after 10 games and I just have doubts we are ready to beat Brasker and/or OSU to close the year. But, we will be better, especially on D, so I would take 8-2 and our chances. At least there are at home.

MSU vs Wisco, btw, in the first Big 10 Championship Game. Book It

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:13 PM | No way Jamie - the Sparty (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

No way Jamie - the Sparty luck train has hit its last station. They'll have 4 conference losses.

I predict 10-2, losses to ND and OSU. We'll beat Iowa, MSU and a tight one against Nebraska at home. That would put us in the B1G champ game.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 9:22 PM | I too have been worried about (Score:1)
RowoneEndzone
RowoneEndzone's picture
Joined: 09/27/2008
MGoPoints: 3123

I too have been worried about the ND game.  Karma and all that but also consider there is no countdown clock for ND which I consider on par with MSU.  I believe Kelly will have his team up big time for this high profile game.  I believe it will be a bloodbath of epic proportions.  Aaaaaand we win!

"Wasn't that Michigan drive just great.  That's like Patton riding into Berlin." ~Bob Ufer

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:35 PM | 9-10 wins (Score:1)
hfhmilkman
Joined: 04/15/2009
MGoPoints: 137

I see a mean of 9-10 wins providing DR runs the ball on average 15 times a game and we take advantage of his stengths.  Our defense is no longer half freshmen and retread journeymen.  You will be shocked what you can do with half decent corners.

Lets look at tossup games.  Illinois just lost a 1st or 2nd Round RB and their best defensive player.  Iowa lost about everyone.  NW has an extreme talent disadvantage.  I think UM can win that shootout. 

The games that concern me the most are ND, MSU, Neb, and OSU.  3 of 4 are home games.  With the exception of OSU all of the teams have flaws that can be exploited.  I watchd Neb against Wash in their bowl game and I was not impressed.  They seemed to take a step back.  As mentioned before MSU loses a ton on defense.  And when does Cousins make big plays?  He does okay if given time.  ND has huge question marks as they may not be with Floyd, do not have a #RB, and have no clue who the QB is.  They do have a lot of talented players.

If we try to restart the offense and insist to make DR into something he is not, mean goes to 7-8.  

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:40 PM | Question (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

How do you figure that NW has a serious talent disadvantage?  Not sure what their recruiting has been like, but with the exception of a few guys, our entire roster is made up of 3* recruits that were recruited to play in a system that favors different strengths. 

Don't take this as a criticism of our team - and obviously we have some awesome players - but I am just curious to know how you arrive at the serious talent disadvantage.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:03 PM | 4 stars according to rivals (Score:1)
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

Van Burgen

Stonum

Roundtree

Martin

Shaw

Koger

Lewan

Robinson

Roh

...and that's just the guys who have played significant time . There's plenty more that I didn't include (Stokes, Gardner, Campbell, Ash, M. Robinson, etc...)

Northwestern has one 4 star player from 2007-2011.

P.S. I'm not trying to start an argument, just providing some information!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:16 PM | thanks (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

For some reason, I didn't realize that Shaw and Koger were that highly ranked. 

A few months back, there was a thread where I listed the large # of 3 and 4* talent that has transferred out or not qualified over the past 4-5 classes, and the numbers were disheartening.  Got me into a glass half empty mode.  Thanks for the positive info.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:03 PM | You think we don't have a (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

You think we don't have a huge talent advantage over NW? You think our roster is all 3 stars?

Projected starters on offense with 4+stars: Denard, Stonum, Roundtree, Koger, Shaw, Lewan, Barnum, Schofield. Maybe one or two of those don't start, but 6 of those are locks. Defense: RVB, Martin, BWC or QW (whoever starts), Roh, C Gordon, Demens, JB Fitzgerald (maybe), MRob (maybe). Again, somewhere between 6 and 8. I promise NW doesn't have as many 4+ stars on their roster this fall as we have in our starting line-up. This does not mean they'll be a certain win, but to say we don't severly out talent them is silly.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 5:09 PM | We obviously have much better (Score:1)
Bluer than yue
Bluer than yue's picture
Joined: 11/07/2010
MGoPoints: 54

We obviously have much better potential talent than NW, but with it being our first road game and with the new system that could be a trap game.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:38 PM | prediction (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

I love this game!

I predict 8 wins - losses to ND, Neb and OSU, as well as a loss to one of the following: Illinois, NW or Lil Bro.

However, I do think that some of our B10 wins will be more comfortable and our losses will be more competitive.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:44 PM | There is no way we get (Score:1)
wlubd
wlubd's picture
Joined: 02/26/2009
MGoPoints: 4971

There is no way we get through at Sparty, at Iowa and home to ND at 10-0. I'm a pessimist but that's hard to believe in the best of cases.

I'm not trying to get in to predictions this year but I think 8-4 would be a good achievement with the coaching change.

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:47 PM | just this morning I questioned someone saying we'd reach 9 (Score:1)
MGlobules
Joined: 11/17/2008
MGoPoints: 5157

wins, but when you stare at the schedule (okay, squint at it, and in rose colored light) it doesn't seem impossible. ND and the confidence the team would take from a win over them, might well be the key.

God, I have been nursing my annoyance over the RR debacle right up to the present. But when I take a look at that schedule. . . I see a lot of teams I have come to hate the last 3-4 years. I used to look on football so much more benignly in the days when we tended to crush all comers. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:54 PM | 7-5. I think it's ridiculous (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

7-5. I think it's ridiculous to think that we'll be significantoly better than that, especially with our defense.

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:23 PM | What do you mean by "with our (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

What do you mean by "with our defense?". I'm not saying we'll have a top 10 defense or anything this year, but I have a hard time using D as a reason for mediocrity. Our D last year was bad, but it's been established how our coaching staff didn't seem to have a clue how run a D and we were still young. Now we return everyone save Mouton and bring in a top notch staff. D could very well be a strength, but it will not drag us down.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:54 PM | I think that it's virtually (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

I think that it's virtually impossible to improve significantly enough to say that we'll be a solid defense with how badly those players performed on the field. Mattison can only do so much.

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:45 PM | Why should we expect the same (Score:1)
LandonC
Joined: 07/24/2008
MGoPoints: 1998

Why should we expect the same mediocre team that took the field last year when we return everyone and have better coaches.  

I only say "better," because that's obviously the point of a coaching change, to improve your abilities at running a football team.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:53 PM | We return everyone, but our (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

We return everyone, but our defense didn't exactly have a lot of talent last year, and better coaching isn't going to make players better than they really are. We have better coaching on defense, but the talent isn't there. On offense... I'm definitely not ready to say that this staff is significantly better than the last before they've even coached a game. Borges's resumé doesn't exactly instill confidence in his abilities either.

"Better" is what the goal of a coaching change is, but it's definitely too early to say this staff's better yet. I know that Hoke's track record doesn't give me a ton of reason to believe that he can turn around a team in one year. 

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 7:30 PM | First of all - coaching and (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

First of all - coaching and scheme can make a big difference, especially when it's been established that those things were sorely lacking last year.  If our coaching and scheme was "meh" last year, then a new staff wouldn't make a big difference.  But that's not the case.

I also think you're really underestimating the amount a player can improve from one year to the next.  Between physical growth, technique training and added game experience, these guys stand to improve quite a bit.  Our defense will have more depth, size and experience.  Our DBs will go from "clueless" to "mediocre," and that change right there might be enough for a full win.  Woolfolk in for Rogers alone could do that, not to mention the improvements on young guys like Avery, Johnson, Robinson, etc. 

Again, I'm not saying the defense will turn heads, but they will be middle of the Big Ten, I predict.  And that will make a big difference.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:54 PM | It really depends on how much... (Score:1)
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

Mattison improves the defense and whether Borges and a new system cause the offense regress rather than improve upon last year. 

The offense needs to remain close to the same level as last year, with Denard shoring up some turnover troubles and a running back emerging to help him. 

The defense needs to chop about 7 to 10 point off that awful 35.2 a game. A better defense creating turnovers and shortening the field for the offense will go a long way in helping the offense transition.

Not to mention it would be nice to see a field goal or two, so our offense can drive 65 yards and not feel like it was a total waste when the ball flies wide left. 

I'll be optimistic and say that by August, Borges will have a good understanding of the offense's strengths and what it will take to win football games. I'm sold that Mattison, on top of the incremental improvement experience should bring, will bring our defense back to somewhere right around average/slightly below average. 

What does it mean for the first ten games? If the above comes to pass, because of Hoke, I don't think we lost to MSU. As much as I hate to say it, that game has become incredibly important and I believe he'll have everyone locked in for a victory. 

The game that worries me is Notre Dame. Out of the first 10 opponents, they are the one that I truly think will be better than us. However, we are at home and it will be the first game under the lights.....

Illinois and Northwestern will both be tougher games than Iowa. I think we handle Iowa this year, they lose a lot, we lose no one and really, we were a slightly below average defense away from beating them last year. 

10-0 is very possible, especially if we luck out with injuries and find a running back. If I had to bet my life on it right now, I'd say 8-2 with a loss to Notre Dame and one to Illinois/Northwestern. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:55 PM | Dreaded.... (Score:1)
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

DOUBLE POST

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 3:58 PM | 3 loses (Score:1)
MGoSoftball
MGoSoftball's picture
Joined: 10/18/2010
MGoPoints: 3602

tosu, Nebraska, Wiscy

From the Red Cedar Message Board:  "God hates us."  Yes He does Lil Bro, yes he does.  Everyone hates you.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:05 PM | I'll (Score:1)
jamiemac
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 7894

I'll take all the action you are willing to risk that Wisconsin doesnt beat Michigan this year. No way the Badgers beat the Wolverines.

It might be the biggest lock out there

Help My Friend Allison Fight ALS 

MSU/IU at the JCB

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:18 PM | Give me a three-leg parlay (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2907

Give me a three-leg parlay of UM not losing to PSU, Indiana and Wisconsin. 6:1 payout on a bazillion dollars == sweet.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:55 PM | Not if we play them in the (Score:1)
the_white_tiger
the_white_tiger's picture
Joined: 02/07/2009
MGoPoints: 5227

Not if we play them in the B1G Championship Game!

Maize n Brew

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 11:09 PM | Wisconsin loses a lot, but (Score:1)
Zone Left
Zone Left's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 13967

Wisconsin loses a lot, but Michigan was just a few plays from being 4-8. I'm reserving my excitement until they either beat Notre Dame and deserve the win or have one loss after beating MSU. I can't get wrapped up in an illusory strong start again.

It's all John Navarre's fault.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:00 PM | What do you think would be required (Score:1)
JohnnyBlue
JohnnyBlue's picture
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 694

to get us into the Big Ten Title Game? 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:00 PM | I honestly think 10 wins is (Score:1)
dennisblundon
dennisblundon's picture
Joined: 02/23/2010
MGoPoints: 6631

I honestly think 10 wins is possible but only if our special teams improves greatly. We are all in agreement that the D will be somewhat better next year because they can't be any worse. Our offense may take a small step back but I think we have to many returning starters for it to be anything more than that. So in order to win 10 games we will have to pull off a couple of close games. This often relies on your ability to make a FG! I am praying that the in coming kicker will cure this problem for us because the result could be a great season.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:02 PM | So....being that it IS 4.20........ (Score:1)
rastafari
rastafari's picture
Joined: 05/15/2009
MGoPoints: 305

the majority here do NOT think my opinion is far out of whack? Keep a cool head mon...stay positive.....let the punt land and bounce our way for once in a LONG time......

In this world there are opinions that exist and then there is truth. My opinions happen to be true.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:03 PM | Fuck bouncing. It would be (Score:1)
wlubd
wlubd's picture
Joined: 02/26/2009
MGoPoints: 4971

Fuck bouncing.

It would be worth spending a scholarship on a guy who can wave fair catch and hold on the damn ball every single punt.

Twitter

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:04 PM | I mean (Score:1)
coastal blue
Joined: 11/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1791

If Tyrone Willingham could stumble his way to 8-0 with all the luck he had his first season, I think Hoke is a shoe-in for 10-0.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:03 PM | 9 wins (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

I like to think of this in terms of liklihood - if we played the game 5 times, how many would Michigan win?  Convert that to a rough percentage and do the math.

  • 5 Probable Wins (>80%): Western, Eastern, SDSU, Minnesota, Purdue
  • 2 Favored (60-80%): @Northwestern, @Illinois
  • 2 Toss-ups (40-60%): Notre Dame,  @Iowa
  • 2 Underdogs (20-40%): @MSU, Nebraska
  • 1 Probable Losses (<20%): OSU

That adds up to about 8, but if you make me pick a number I'd take the optimistic view and say 9 wins...

I don't forsee us getting upset in any of the 7 likely wins (even by Illinois or NW). I see a win in one of the toss-ups and then pull an upset in one of the 3 toughest games, probably late in the year when the D has had a chance to sort itself out and Denard settles into the new offense.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:49 PM | Not buying the Sparty love - (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

Not buying the Sparty love - they should be a toss-up, and only because it's on the road.

Last year Sparty's big year was due to a lot of average B10 teams and missing out on one of the two good teams in the league. Sparty was 1-2 against top 25 teams, and although their Wisconsin win was a good one, it was the only impressive thing they did all year. The other two good teams MSU played absolutely blew them out. They lose their star defender and a handful of other starters. I think MSU takes a small step back, but even that 2010 MSU team probably goes 9-3 at best this year.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 7:33 PM | Sparty (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

It's not that I think MSU's so great (they may indeed take a step in wins) it's just a bad spot for Michigan. MSU does returns a lot of talent and it's Michigan's first tough road game. Denard could still be adjusting to the new offense to some degree and Sparty will be the first stiff test he faces.  Plus, they did beat us by 17 in AA last year...

OTOH, I do have some faith in our old-school D figuring out a way to stop their old-school running game (more so than say a spread-oriented attack). 

Still, I'd be pretty surprised if we won in East Lansing this year.  Hope I'm wrong.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 8:04 PM | Yes, they did beat us by 17 (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17709

Yes, they did beat us by 17 last year (which is a solid margin, but not exactly a blowout).  However, a couple things go differently and it's a completely different ballgame.  First, Denard had a bad day throwing the ball, completing about half his passes and throwing 3 picks.  Those three picks lead to 10 Sparty points, and one of the picks was when we were 4 yards from scoring.  That's your 17 points right there. 

Also, MSU ran for 250 yards in that game, with 102 of that coming on 2 big runs.  This year our run D will be improved, but even if we can eliminate those two big runs it's a major improvement.  And we missed a FG, which maybe that will be better this year and maybe not.

Lastly, although MSU returns a decent number on both sides of the ball, they lose some big playmakers too.  Mark Dell is who really beat us in the receiving game - 93 yards and a TD - and he's gone.  Charlie Gantt, their big TE, is also gone.  Cousins will be a senior, but he won't have the same targets he had a year ago.  Plus, outside of Donald Spencer who I haven't heard much about, MSU hasn't brought in any playmakers at WR in the last few classes.

In summary, MSU is a push at worst.  Last year, they outgained us by 150 yards, but were +3 in turnovers, had 2 big plays and didn't miss a FG, which we did.  Combine that with the fact that our team is taking a step forward from 2010, and MSU is likely taking a stepback (albeit a small one), I think MSU is, at worst, a toss-up. 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 22nd, 2011 at 5:03 PM | I hear you (Score:1)
Mat
Mat's picture
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 1506

And I'd like to share in your optimism but here are my concerns:

We can't just discount Denards 3 turnovers.  It seemed that nearly anytime he faced a tough defense turnovers were pretty frequent.  We can hope that changes with a new scheme, staff, and with him as a Junior, but it seems a little optimistic to just assume Denard won't hand MSU some points, particularly on the road.

I wasn't so impressed by Dell.  He was fine, but with how open MSU's receivers were and with Cousins back, I'd expect their passing game to remain fairly effective.  The key though was that we were physically dominated in the running game.  If we stop their run game, it's a different ball game.

The assumption that we are taking a step forward is just that.  Yeah, its safe to say the defense will be better based on the experienced coaches and number of returning contributors...but the offense - none of us know how good it will be or if we come anywhere close to being as effective as last years, turnovers and stinkers included.

Personally, I think we'll be an average Big10 defense and above average Big 10 offense.  With the way the schedule lays out I think leads us to a few more wins.  But I don't necessarily think we'll be significantly better as a team than we were in '10 because that offense really blew up in the UConn and ND games and then single-handedly won us the Illinois and Indiana games.  Hard to say how the '11 team would have done in those situations....

  • Login or register to post comments
April 23rd, 2011 at 1:26 AM | I really have nothing to add to the discussion (Score:1)
M-Wolverine
M-Wolverine's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 38866

Just that your avatar is hyp-mo-tizing me.

"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:07 PM | 2 wins would be fine with me. (Score:1)
HAIL_YES
HAIL_YES's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 302

Over ND & Ohio. Every other win would be icing on the cake.

Big Blue has a good chance of beating the bucks this year. Notre Dame not so much. It's going to suck if we lose the first night game at Michigan Stadium.

I'm saying 8 wins tops.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:09 PM | can someone please explain (Score:1)
spoid_kills
spoid_kills's picture
Joined: 01/17/2009
MGoPoints: 105

can someone please explain the new "ohio" thing? Is it just to annoy OSU people, or is there some history to it?

  • Login or register to post comments
April 23rd, 2011 at 5:36 AM | According to official history (Score:1)
BlueDragon
BlueDragon's picture
Joined: 11/14/2010
MGoPoints: 16726

Bo spent the whole year preparing for M-OSU 1969.  This was the year of "50" and putting labels on everything with the number 50 to motivate the team after the 1968 M-OSU debacle.  The week before the game, the players had an impromptu "Beat Ohio" chant going in the locker room.  Other then that, I couldn't tell you where it comes from.

Abort, Retry, Fail?

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:23 PM | so much wrong with this comment (Score:1)
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 11210

1.  The Giants do not play ND or "Ohio" - they are in the NFL.  They are also "Big Blue."  We are not. 

2.  We don't play Ohio University this year.  Even if we did, I wouldn't consider it to be a big deal if we beat them - they are terrible.  I would rather beat OSU.

3.  Would you really be fine with a 2-10 season that included a loss to MSU? 

4.  You think that we have no chance against ND, but that we have a good chance to beat the "bucks"?  Seriously?  Even with their off the field problems, the "bucks" are loaded at virtually every position.  Add to that the fact that the tat 5 will be playing in only their 7th game of the season - i.e. less banged up than if they played the full 12.  Sorry, that game scares me the most.

 

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:39 PM | Eastern, Western, San Diego (Score:1)
HAIL_YES
HAIL_YES's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 302

Given the schedule this year I'm assuming everyone would know I meant Eastern Michigan, Western Michigan, and San Diego State. Much the same as ND and Ohio.

The Notre Dame game (I spelled it out just for you) scares me the most because of my close proximity to South Bend. Around these parts it's the biggest game of the year and if we lose I'm going to have to here about it for a year.

Obviously 2-10 will not be good enough, that's why I picked 8-4 at the end.

I'm not even going to explain "Big Blue" and what it means to me personally.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:49 PM | hear and here (Score:1)
HAIL_YES
HAIL_YES's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 302

Given how my day has gone thus far, I'm going to acknowledge that I typed "here" when I should have typed "hear" before someone proof reads my post and kindly points it out to me.

This is like my third day on Mgoblog. I can't wait for tomorrow.

  • Login or register to post comments
April 22nd, 2011 at 9:44 PM | Welcome aboard. (Score:1)
BlueDragon
BlueDragon's picture
Joined: 11/14/2010
MGoPoints: 16726

Mgoblog:  It's not just a blog, it's an adventure.

Abort, Retry, Fail?

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:15 PM | Maturing talent plus an excellent... (Score:1)
BigCat14
BigCat14's picture
Joined: 09/14/2009
MGoPoints: 277

coaching staff brings Michigan closer to being Michigan again.  id say the nd game could be a tough one because it is still in the first part of the year.  maybe i am into the hokorgessitson coolaid too much, then again maybe it is good to have hope once again.  the more the season goes on the closer the coaches will have our guys where they want them in the new schemes.  remember lots of experience and these are players recruited to Michigan so there are brains available to adjust and i am thinking the schemes wont be as  complex.  i could see a couple of brain fart losses but i could also see (easier schedule, dominos falling in the correct order) no losses going into closer than the experts think contests with brasker and 'ohio'!  Go Blue bringing back the glory! 

I am thankful to live in an awesome country!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
April 20th, 2011 at 4:31 PM | 9+ (Score:1)
mgoSk
mgoSk's picture
Joined: 06/09/2010
MGoPoints: 1153

This has got to be one of the harder seasons to predict given the amount of returning starters, an easier schedule, a new coaching staff, an emphasis on defense, returning starting QB for the first time in a while, etc.

I'd be willing to bet that the improved defense (top 60 at least when all is said and done), will make up for the potential lag on the offensive side of the ball. If Matt Wile comes in and is a tenth of as advertised, that makes two of three phases improved leaving the offense as the deciding factor for the season. Because I see Denard really growing into something special as the season goes on, I see a 9 win season at worst (including bowl the game; 9-3 bowl game loss or 8-4 bowl game win). I think the crop of 6-6 and 7-5 regular season Big Ten teams  from last year are mostly all on the rise, while Wisconsin, OSU, and MSU will likely falter. The league will be fairly balanced I think.

I do see the Notre Dame game as dangerous because it's so early, but hopefully the festive atmosphere and the tribute to Desmond will inspire the team to beat the Irish for a third straight year. I think Hoke's got a good shot at beating OSU and an even better chance at beating MSU. Nebraska is hard to guage with them being new to the league.

Should be a very exciting season though.

Go Blue!

Leaders and Best

  • Login or register to post comments
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.