The State Of Our Open Threads: After Illinois

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

Although yesterday was a relatively breezy day - sometimes literally, if you spent any of yesterday outside - we do have some things to run through in the aftermath of the game thread from just about 17 hours or so ago. 

There was light participation insofar as the thread is concerned - 1,260 posts - but this is typical when it is a home game and a liveblog is running for the game. A couple years ago, it was actually fairly rare for threads to break 2,000 posts and this year we've actually only done that once - for Wisconsin. 

Anyway, there were only 109 fucks given for this game, which is way down from the high of 422 fucks given during our game with Wisconsin and even less than the number of fucks given for Rutgers. That isn't to say that Illinois is worse than Rutgers - Illinois is Rutgers but with some money in savings, if you will. The number of shits remained fairly steady, only up four shits from last game to 54 shits and down from a season high so far of 102 shits given against Colorado. 

How does that translate to tempo-free thread statistics? 

FART Rate, or Fucks Adjusted For Real Time, came out to 0.574 for this thread, down slightly from Rutgers and down significantly from Wisconsin, which sat at 2.110. That was 2 fucks given per minute of airtime, in other words.

SHART Rate, or Shits Adjusted For Real Time, was 0.284, which is up slightly from Rutgers, but only a little more than half of the season high against Colorado, which was 0.510, or in the case of that game, one shit for every two minutes of airtime.

The SQUIRT number, or the combined FART / SHART, was 2.019, so almost 2 fucks for each shit, which is less than the season average of close to three fucks for every shit. and down from the high against Wisconsin, which was 6.492.

Of amusing note, the FAP Rate - Fucks Adjusted For Total Plays - was exactly 1.000 - we managed precisely a fuck per snap. 

Let's shift to another interesting trend - a noted uptick in "damn". Here's the graph of normalized values for the Original Six of this analysis:

 photo SOOT_Illinois_Normal_zpsu732jhde.png

"Damn" is the gray bar, and for the last three games, we've been trending upward overall with its use. Going back through these threads, much of that can be explained with the board's general assessment of the quality of play, but also a couple moments where someone was down or injured. For a long time, we did not use "damn" nearly as much as you would think on the board, but it is beginning to find expression.

Overall efficiency - 474 tracked words measured against thread size - was 2.66, which is the third lowest of the year. Only Penn State and Hawaii managed lower overall efficiency scores. That being said, 2.66 - in the revised scale - is a fairly easy win most times, whereas in the older version of this metric those were typically stressful wins or close losses. Harbaugh effect indeed. 

So, on to Michigan State. I am sure we'll have more to report next Sunday.

Comments

LSAClassOf2000

October 24th, 2016 at 8:57 AM ^

When I initially began doing this about threee years ago, I actually thought about that very thing and having only a mid-season and end-of-season breakdown, but even in the knowledge that this would increase its overall validity, it was never meant to be a scholarly work by any means so I opted to have some fun with it instead.

It is correct, however, to point out the "observer effect" here, although sometimes in the more straining moments of the season, I am still sure we're getting mostly genuine responses, and I do eliminate clear attempts to skew the results from the start each week. 

2427_Couzens

October 24th, 2016 at 3:48 PM ^

The use of damn may not necessarily a bad thing.  It could be be an expression of incredulousness.  Like when Jordan Lewis one hands an interception, it easily becomes a good "Damn!"  Or probably more accurately..."daaaaaamn!"