Rotten Nuts: Thoughts on Culture at Ohio Sports University and Beyond

Submitted by Denard In Space on January 3rd, 2020 at 4:28 PM

i wanted to ruminate on OSU for a bit. to be clear: nothing i say here is about coaching or strategy which is all fair game to discuss. this is about program culture. 

i think OSU as an institution is filled with scumbags, but they are currently better at football than we are. i would love to crush them, and instead i choose to enjoy the sport, watch the games, support my alma mater, and not enter into emotional crisis when we lose to a better team -- but that's just me. 

anyway: a lot has been made of the absurd online course load that OSU athletes can take, consequently allowing them to focus on football significantly more so than academics. why isn't this possible at michigan if it's possible there? our respective institutions value different things in a time when education is increasingly precarious.

at Ohio Sports, they have long mortgaged the "legitimacy" of their student athletics program, openly acknowledging it as absurd by flouting the rules constantly. at michigan, we have maintained a stance of "integrity" while we (harbaugh) try to convince ourselves and the world that there's something special about taking classes and playing football at the same time. 

i believe the difference is rooted in many factors that affect both institutions, but includes the corporatization of higher education, the defunding of k-12 schools in favor of private enterprise, and long-standing feelings of cultural inadequacy in comparison to the michigan people that can read and write good and don't wash themselves with a rag on a stick. that and the confused ethics around money-making in sports. i won't get into any of the former stuff in a sports blog, however.

the main sports factor here, though, is the professionalization of college football and its relation to television money. we make a tremendous amount of money off of this stuff -- yet there is a contradictory acknowledgement by folks like harbaugh and manuel that NIL rights are worthy of exploration and that athletes deserve compensation. they want to go about it the "right way" but still engage in the same exploitation as all the other programs. i think that is hypocritical. 

tressell, urban, and now day have created an atmosphere where they don't play school but actually mean that. for these elite football players, Ohio Sports is not a fucking academic institution, it's a professional training academy. it's IMG college. while michigan players are being enriched with life experiences such as traveling to south africa, the goons in ohio are working on football. when shea patterson was playing golf, justin fields was pretending to be a student while working on football. it's a different mindset that only pretends there's something special about college football before going to work. 

i guarantee, however, that not all their players get all the extralegal benefits, just the stars. but in order to facilitate this, they all must be okay with lying. the coaches and admin are all good with cheating some of their own players like regular ncaa athletes, while rewarding others with cash and benefits. the cheating bleeds into a culture that will make a decision to cover up domestic violence and then lie about it. i think that's extremely hypocritical, but also deeply cynical. 

and that's kind of the crux: Ohio Sports is a cynical institution, we are a romantic one. they pay their stars while still exploiting them, and exploit everyone else more to placate the facade. they lie; they enable abusers to prowl their campus; they win. we romanticize a wonderful football past; we romanticize the michigan identity; we romanticize the bo era and 1997. we feel entitled to relive the glory of our past. they feel entitled to the present at any cost. 

the central reason, then, that elite recruits haven't really amassed for us in the way they have for the "football factories" (Ohio Sports isn't the only school that is a fake institution of course, they're just the worst people in that they're from ohio) is that these athletes now have options to develop their craft without having to play school at all. zach harrison probably saw that his quickest ticket to millions of dollars and lifetime wealth and security is to focus on his profession. being a kid, i bet it was extremely tempting to come to michigan and be around people i am going to assume he liked better because they're not buckeyes, and doing fun things like going on trips.

but we live in a world where money is freedom, safety, and security. any rational person who is touted as elite would be mistaken to not take the shortest path towards these things. michigan's path is circuitous and filled with obstacles like college classes. you have to want that to come to michigan. most elite athletes don't want that. why not opt for a more professional approach? 

i think that because of these things, michigan fans have to decide whether they want to be another meaningless place that takes the easiest path towards winning, or if they feel there is something unique about michigan that's worthy of support despite being worse at football than our rival. i am in the latter category, having completed both undergrad and graduate degrees at michigan, and having experienced what makes michigan special. i value this more than winning at all costs. i don't know if there's a direct trade-off between these dynamics, but i know that i'd probably be a lot less interested in football if my team's coach was a piece of shit like urban meyer. 

i have little recourse, then,  but to remain enthusiastic and optimistic, support our team, and adjust the expectation from "the best team in the world" to very good, plucky underdogs. teams like iowa and wisconsin exist and have great traditions and are mostly enjoyed by their fanbases, with many good seasons and successes short of championships.

unfortunately that's where we are stuck right now. i don't think a coaching change or a new scheme is going to overcome vast gaps in talent and ability, no less the other significant advantages already discussed. but to me, this is still much better than rooting for a fucking sham run by liars who will go to any length to maximize profit, including covering up domestic violence, and whose aim is to extract as much wealth as possible from 17-22 year olds.

if that's what you're in to,  just buy an IMG academy jersey and embrace the slime. even if the rules themselves are dumb, playing by a different set of rules that trample everything else just to win is what stupid, childish bullies do. throw in copious greed, and that sounds like a buckeye to me. 

with legislation and more legal entanglement sure to come, we have reason to believe that the landscape of recruiting and college football writ large will indeed change in the near future. but  for now, unless we choose to change who we are for what i deem to be the worse, we are going to be miserable.

which begs the question: given all that we know, why would anyone want to be like Ohio Sports University in the first place? 

Comments

MgoWood

January 5th, 2020 at 7:13 PM ^

If this is how you feel about IMG, how do you feel about the kids who we have recruited, whom also attended this so called slimey place?  Just curious because if we recruit them, doesn't that then put us in the slime bucket so to speak? Also, is every top coach who makes it to the playoff year in/year out a piece of shit liar?

JFW

January 6th, 2020 at 10:22 AM ^

So, this may send me to bolivia, but....

your post, and Brian make some excellent points. At the same time, I see stuff like this:

Highest-ranked FBS schools in newly released APR data (2017-18).

Air Force 997
Northwestern 996
Clemson 992
Duke 992
Washington 991
Vandy 991
BC 989
Nevada 989
Utah 989
Wake 989
Rice 987
Ohio State 987
UCF 987

How do I square that with the idea that they are a football factory? 

sharks

January 6th, 2020 at 9:38 PM ^

Cardale Jones earned his bachelor's from OSU, the first in his family to do so.  He's been paid about $2,000,000 to carry a clipboard in the NFL, and is rumored to be making a base of $500,000 in the upcoming XFL season.  A success in my humble opinion.

crg

January 8th, 2020 at 10:09 AM ^

Except that none of his career depended on his academics and his degree - it provided no benefit to him outside of his own physical gifts and he clearly showed no desire to pursue it (by his own words).  He may have been compelled to finish by various parties (especially after his comments went viral), but his situation doesn't suggest a "win" to me from the principles of the educational system.  Does earning a degree mean anything if it is hollow?  Some of the people who went through the sham programs at UNC recently also were granted degrees - that doesn't mean they truly earned them either.

crg

January 8th, 2020 at 9:46 AM ^

People are losing sight of the larger picture (assuming they ever saw it in the first place).  The symptoms we've been observing the past few decades (bagmen, loose/absent player academic standards, lying/cheating by programs by NCAA rules and US law, "football factories", etc.) will never be rectified by NIL or any other action to just move around money. 

The core problem is the fact that after-school extra-curricular activities (mainly football and basketball) that was intended to be a pastime for full time students has been allowed to become a bloated industry that is almost purely about revenue.  This has lead to kids choosing their educational path that has little to nothing to do with actual academics and purely about their path to playing professional sports - which is not at all what an academic institution is intended to do (we are seeing people turn down full rides to Ivy-league caliber schools to attend state-schools for their football programs - something no logical person would do if academics were priority). It is quite shameful since some of the schools that helped to really create and promote these sports over a century ago have fallen out of the picture since they were unwilling to compromise their standards in order to keep up in the arms race.

The only way this will ever be "solved" is when there is a decoupling of the "professional sport" aspect from the academic institutions.  Some people contend that the sport would suffer/die at the collegiate level if such a move were made - which is unlikely considering that most college football fans are watching because they have some form of affiliation/connection to the schools and want to see a win, regardless of whether the players are "elite" or otherwise.  A win by their walk-ons against another school's walk-ons would be just as sweet.

There are many ways this can be accomplished and are discussed elsewhere, but until there is a genuine effort to make this happen this discussion will continue to be... academic.

crg

January 8th, 2020 at 3:29 PM ^

U Chicago was one of the schools is specifically meant when referring to the older schools - damned shame since UC was, at one time, legitimately one of the best in the nation and our chief rival.

I do not want to see UM drop similarly in status nor should it.  Instead I want to see the schools that are serious about stopping the slide of college sports into being de facto trade schools band together and fight it.  Burn down the current system (propped up because it funnels millions of dollars into school admins - yet not into actual academic gains - while the real money goes to the tv networks).  Open a true professional minor league to bridge the gap between HS and NFL (which every other major sport already does) and then apply the same academic and financial requirements/considerations to the student athletes as the rest of the student body - including the elimination of athletic scholarships.  ANY student that needs financial aid because of their socioeconomic status should receive it if they can meet the academic requirements - not because they can play a sport.

markusr2007

January 8th, 2020 at 2:09 PM ^

Winning at all costs works.

I have yet to see a persuasive argument against it given the current competitive field of play.

  • Is the NCAA going to "take you to the woodshed" with sanctions if you follow this mantra?
  • Is the public going to "look down on you" because you consistently land a top 5 national recruiting class and No. 1 or No. 2 conference recruiting class in the conference every year?
  • Will you lose your reputation and who you are by going 83-9 overall and 54-5 in conference over 7 years?
  • Does the world care that you held a repeat domestic violence offender on the coaching staff for years?

The answer, we have learned, is of course not. 

Truth is, nobody really cares. 

The public too only cares about winning.  Nobody cares about winning with class or winning with integrity anymore.

The media doesn't care.

Fans don't care.

And college football recruits and their families also definitely do not care.

They all only care about wins.

To this point, Ohio State got their priorities straight, budgeted resources accordingly and then implemented their strategy and tactics to perfection (facilities, marketing, coaching hires, recruiting, etc).

Michigan got their priorities in order too. I don't think Michigan's priorities are necessarily wrong now (though they were before with David Brandon). But the outcome has been different. In some cases decidedly so.

Going back to the lifeblood of any college football program, Ohio State is going to land the No. 4 recruiting class in the nation next month for 2020. Meanwhile, Michigan's class will be ranked No. 11, just barely ahead of Penn State.  Nebraska and Wisconsin made huge advances in their recruiting classes for 2020.

We will see more of the same, I'm afraid.