USA-England Good, Bad, & Ugly Comment Count

Brian

hand-of-clod The Good

Result. A point from the first match is fantastic, especially since the Slovenia-Algeria game was a crime against soccer. If the US wins against Slovenia, which they should, they are basically through. A tie is probably good enough going into a final game against a shambolic(!) and likely eliminated Algeria squad.

Timmah! Was where he needed to be, made the saves he could make, and did not spill a harmless ball into the net. He was fortunate that a number of English shots were directly at him, but he saved a couple sledgehammers without offering up a rebound that Rooney could have poached.

Steve Cherundolo. Essentially shut down the right side of the English attack and, as a bonus, drew two dangerous fouls on Milner, forcing Capello to take him off just a half-hour in. He coped with the speed of Wright-Phillips and Cole for most of the game; given Spector's recent troubles it's easy to envision the US conceding another goal or two if Cherundolo isn't on the field.

Dempsey & Donovan. Neither had a spectacular game. Both were still the USA's best and most dangerous players. Donovan set up most of the USA's dangerous chances and provided his usual quality set piece service; Dempsey obviously scored. Even if it was a howler by the goalie, score == good.

The Meh

Jozy Altidore. Par for the course: one brilliant piece of individual skill and not a whole lot else. Created a golden opportunity that Green and the post conspired to deny. Also whiffed on Donovan's dangerous

Robbie Findley. Josh Wolff 2.0. Took some long balls down well and helped with possession. Still wasteful when he does get the ball in a dangerous position; even got caught on his breakaway because of sloppy footwork with the ball.

Michael Bradley. I'm not really sure. I'm just putting him here because I don't recall much good or bad from Bradley.

Central defense. Onyewu did get pulled out of position on the quick Gerrard goal but since as the game wore on it became clear that the game plan for dealing with Rooney was to have the central defense immediately step out on him no matter where he was, he can hardly be blamed for following the gameplan. Zonal Marking has a bunch of stills showing the various ways in which this strategy exposed various parts of the field to  be exploited. Here's Onyewu stepping out on Rooney, getting beaten, sucking Bocanegra in, and setting up Lennon for a dangerous cross:

onyew-dragged

ZM sees this as Onyewu repeatedly committing errors, but from my perspective the US decided that Rooney would not beat them and they'd take their chances with Heskey and others, especially since the absence of Barry forced the ineffective deployment of Milner/SWP and the Nats' tucked in attacking midfielders largely neutralized the England fullbacks. The focus on Rooney put Heskey in for England's best chance of the second half. His shot went directly at Howard.

For the rest of the game, the central D pairing kept England out. Demerit was especially good at harrying Rooney, who had a minimal impact until late when everyone got tired and England finally started attempting to exploit the still-awkward Onyewu in some one-on-one situations.

The downside for the central D: both Heskey and Crouch had their way aerially, with Heskey knocking down ball after ball for his teammates and Crouch having some scary moments in the box. That's somewhat unavoidable—Heskey is a beast and Crouch is 6'7"—but a fully healthy Onyewu may have competed better.

The Bad

Carlos Bocanegra. This was definitely going to happen, but it did: Aaron Lennon was too much for Bocanegra, providing most of the England offense in the second half. He'll cope better against less blazing wingers.

Ricardo Clark. The writing was on the wall when Clark went 90 against Australia, but why a guy with two appearances for his club since the end of the last MLS season got the nod over a comparable player with a lot more recent playing time under his belt (Edu) is still unclear. Clark let Gerrard loose less than five minutes into the game, and that's especially egregious since it was obvious that center-backs stepping out was part of the gameplan and that Clark is supposed to be the most defensive-minded player on the pitch other than Onyewu and Demerit.

I haven't reviewed the game yet but the first serious rewatch posts are rolling in and Clark does not do well in them:

There is one camera angle on ESPN3 and I caught at least four other opportunities to the early gaffe by Clark of ball watching–or clipping his nails–or whatever he was doing rather than getting on the play. (19, 25, 34, 84 minutes)

Defensive awareness is about the only thing Clark is supposed to bring to a game, and he's not really doing that after missing six months injured.

I'm with the rest of the internet: I expect we'll see Torres the next two matches as the US adopts a more aggressive posture based on possession.

The Ugly

Wooo!

Also South Africa. Vuvuzelas, incredible swathes of empty seats—I'm watching Japan-Cameroon and it looks like Crisler when Michigan plays Arkansas Pine-Bluff—a bunch of money spent on sports in an area of the world that has serious problems… way to go FIFA.

Miscellaneous Items

With the draw against England, I'm with Braves and Birds:

The weekend's results create a new goal for the Nats. Coming into the tournament, we all wanted them to make it out of the group my any means necessary. Now, with a draw against England and Germany looking like the best team in the tournament, there should be motivation for the Nats to do their best to win the group to avoid the Germans in the round of sixteen.

If the US and England both win on Friday, the final matchday will be a race to avoid Germany. Big if, though, against a Slovenia side that rarely concedes goals.

The Run of Play on the game.

Comments

Seth

June 14th, 2010 at 8:07 PM ^

Brian, is there anything we can do to take away the dollar store kazoos from the locals?

Use NATO if we must, just stop the buzzing.

PurpleStuff

June 14th, 2010 at 8:29 PM ^

At this point these things have to go.  Blatter's talk about respecting the local culture doesn't make any sense when local teams aren't involved in the game.  I saw mostly American and English fans who bought tickets for the game on Saturday and who paid big money on travel and tourism (the reason South Africa invested so much in putting on the World Cup).  All of them were drowned out by a handful of knuckleheads with these ridiculously loud horns.  The noise also diminishes the game (zero crowd noise and actual excitement/emotion coming through the screen) for the billions of folks watching the games at home.  There are 32 nations competing in the World Cup and people are following it closely in many more.  Fans of the non-vuvuzela loving nations should be able to enjoy their own games in peace. 

If fans want to bring the horns to the South Africa games or if any other African team's fans view this as an important tradition on their home continent, then by all means let them buzz away.  That is home field advantage.  But the rest of us shouldn't have to suffer just because a country is so dangerous that traveling supporters have stayed away in droves (SEE the ton of empty seats at every game so far) and because FIFA is too PC to risk offending people by outlawing a stupid/silly practice.  Also, these things weren't used in South Africa until the 1990's so claiming this is some grand tradition that must be respected at all costs seems completely preposterous.

Away Goal

June 14th, 2010 at 11:46 PM ^

It wouldn't be so bad if they only blew them after goals or it didn't drown out the crowd.  Watching a Mexico game and not being able to hear the crowd sing Canta y no llores is a disgrace.  I hate Mexico when the US plays them but I love to hear their fans during non-vs-US games.  Taking that away takes away from what the WC should be.

zlionsfan

June 15th, 2010 at 2:04 AM ^

Can someone call Bob Bradley and tell him that you can't carry over unused substitutions from previous matches? I swear, between CONCACAF qualifying and the England match (since Gomez didn't actually get in), he must think that if we make it to the quarters he's going to be able to sub out the entire side.

I heard there was this thing in soccer where you could actually pass the ball from one side of the field to the other. You know, to create space and stuff. Especially when your opponents are basically standing directly in front of you and daring you to go wide.

I would rather have seen Gomez on the field earlier. I'm sure BB was more than happy to put the match in his pocket at that point, but hell, we'd really done a decent job of stifling England's offense (at least on the balls they could reach - there seemed to be a few times when Rooney was actually free and thankfully the service he got was like what you'd get at Pizza Hut 10 minutes after closing), certainly it might be worthwhile to take a shot at stealing two more points?

I wish Altidore had let the one ball go across to Dempsey. Left corner, second goal of the match, 2-1 US. At least I think it happened when we were level. Anyway, Dempsey seems to be in a mode where that ball is going past the keeper; Altidore, not so much. (Kind of like, well, Heskey.)

I think it was Alexi Lalas who said some crap about America being a cradle of goalkeepers or something when questioned about Howard and what would happen if he couldn't play (at this point he seems ready to go against Slovenia). Yes, we have produced some pretty good keepers, but right now the best one by far is in net and frankly I'm not quite ready to see either of the other two try to fill Howard's shoes.

I am firmly in the anti-vuvuzela camp. If that crap comes over here I will be breaking stuff. The goddamn plastic things you see at baseball and basketball games are bad enough. I remember the good old days when people actually made noise themselves and didn't need plastic tools to do it.