Tuesday Presser Transcript 10-25-11: Coordinators Comment Count

Heiko

Al Borges


Borges look likey...

How was your bye week? “Good. So far so good. Got a little bit of a jump start in the game plan, which is good. Like every bye week, we had a chance to heal up. We had some kids that could have used a little bit of time, and the bye always gives you that opportunity, so it was a good time to have it.”

Did the bye week give you an opportunity to add to the playbook or did you just work on what you already have? “Well, just to do the nuances that go with any game plan. I think one of the mistakes you make in the bye weeks and bowl games is you have too much time and sometimes you get a little zealous about wanting to do too much. You come up with all these ideas because you have all this time to practice them, and sometimes it’s not a good idea. But we’re not really doing anything more in this plan than we would do in any other one just because it’s a bye week.”

Hoke said offensive line needs to improve. What are the things you want to see out of them? “So much fundamental, you know. Good steps, good pad level, playing with leverage, and then targeting the front, some of those types of things, making sure we’re getting every play started because I think that was a problem a week ago. We had trouble getting some plays started because we didn’t target the front as well as we should have. Most of it is fundamental. It usually is.”

Have those things slipped as the year’s gone on? “They’re getting better. They have improved. Up till the last game I thought we were getting a good feel for it, and sometimes you get a rude awakening and you realize you’re not where you need to be. Sometimes it takes a game like that to realize that, so we’ve gone back and Coach Funk’s done a great job building those kids from the ground up, starting over again and making sure the steps are right and just doing all those things that are fundamental to the position.”

Is there something missing from the running backs that keeps them from being feature backs? “No. No one’s standing out, basically. It’s not something missing. It’s just no one is standing out, and until somebody does, we’re going to operate the way we’ve operated.”

(more after the jump)

Hoke doesn’t want to blame it all on the running backs. How much do you put on them? “It’s like I said before, it’s never one thing. It’s always a combination of things. People always want to blame one player or a coach or whatever, and it’s generally not that. It’s generally a combination of issues. It certainly isn’t all the running backs. It certainly isn’t all the offensive line. Certainly isn’t all the quarterbacks. When you’re not playing well, usually nobody plays well. If you have a bad game, there’s not many awards that get given out. There’s no accolades because generally when you grade the tape, there’s very few guys that played well, and in that game we didn’t have very many kids play well. It’s not the backs. It’s not the line. It’s all of the above.”

Seems like you left a lot of yards out there in the passing game. How do you teach Denard to see the field better? “There’s only one way I know, and that’s to rep. Keep repping, keep giving them the same plays time and time again until the muscle memory responds. Don’t confuse them. As he does it more and gets a better feel for it, it will start to flow. That’s really the way I know. There’s no substitute for experience. I’m telling you. The more you experience those plays, the better you get at them.”

Have you been moving away from that diamond formation? “We’ve run variations of that formation. The nucleus of the play is still maybe diamond-oriented, but it may not be exactly that look.”

Do you think it works better like that -- “It’s just variation. Nuance. Variation. Different looks for a defense. It’s part of playing.”

What about Purdue’s defense impresses you? “They played really well last week. Of all the games we watched, last week they really showed up. They came to play. They were fired up. They were very aggressive, particularly with their secondary. They come down hard with their safeties, they lock up their corners. 21’s a very good corner. They just play a nice, physical brand of football. They came to play. I’m sure right now they’re playing with some confidence. We need to bring our A-game for this one.”

That fourth-and-inches call against Michigan State, what do you see when you watch it again? “It was underexecuted. We don’t design the play for the quarterback to be blindsided. That’s basically it. I’m trying to move on to Purdue. That one I’m trying to forget.”

Molk says the offensive line is an A some days and a B some other days. Do you see it that way? “Yeah, to a degree. You look at the sum total of how we’ve played in seven games, it’s been pretty good. We run the ball pretty good. We’re protecting really good. The one thing you don’t want to do is take one game and let that -- you want to learn from that game, don’t get me wrong, -- but you don’t want to panic and all of a sudden say the offensive line’s no good. That’s simply not true. We have to fix our problems, and we’re in the process of doing that right now.”

What do you think brought about those problems with the offensive line? Was Michigan State just the best team you’ve played so far? “I think defensively they are the best team we’ve played so far. They did a nice job, but some of the things we did were avoidable, let’s put it that way. We’ve made some errors -- we could have done a better job, that’s all I have to say. Michigan State is a formidable defense.”

The last four weeks you’ve scored on your opening possession -- “And you guys thought -- at the beginning, everybody asked me, ‘How come you’re such slow starters?’ Well how many games have we had where we haven’t scored in the first quarter? Two or three? And what did I tell you? I told you that traditionally, offensively we’ve been a fast-starting team where I’ve coordinating. We’ve always -- not always, always is a strong word -- traditionally we’ve been a fast-starting football team. And for some reason we weren’t. Well now we’re starting to get it a little more as we go and it’s been better.” Is that just a comfort level? “Yeah, somewhat. Somewhat. Somewhat more comfortable. I think the kids understand what we want to do a little better.”

Do you script plays still? “We script about 15-17. And I don’t necessarily go right by the script, right down the line with those plays, but usually they all get called by the middle of the second quarter or maybe earlier, depending on how we’re playing.”

Hoke said you evaluated players during the bye week. Any players you think deservie more playing time? “Well I’m not going to say if there is or there isn’t, but this is a great opportunity to do that. You have a little extra time, so you can hand the ball to a couple guys, or you can put a couple linemen in there that you may not have been able to get as much time for because of the rush of having to practice and game plan and such. So yeah, I love bye weeks for that kind of stuff, and I love bowl games for that kind of stuff, so you can get a look at some of the kids you haven’t had a good look at before.”

Rawls? “He’s played some, and we’ll see as we go. We’re not committing anything there, but he’s a kid that certainly has some ability.”

Are you amused by fans who want to bench Denard for Devin? “Am I amused? I don’t know if that’s a good word. I kind of have to laugh to keep from crying, I guess. A little bit, but I said the other day, I’m not the smartest guy in the world -- and if you watch that last game you probably would agree with that -- but I’m not dumb enough to take 300 yards of total offense out of the game. That’s ludicrous in my opinion. There is a point with anybody, if the productivity is consistently going down and you have to re-evaluate, but he hasn’t reached that point. Not even close. That’s simply not fair to the kid or to the team.”

Do you like how you’ve incorporated Devin into the game? “Yeah, I do. I think he’s -- we’ve found spots for him and continue to try and do that. He’s getting some playing time and he’s having some fun, and he’s learning how to play the position a little bit, so it’s been good. He’s taken a few licks, so it’s been good for him and it’s good for everyone. And as long as it helps us win, that’s all. That’s all we care about. Everything we do -- every play that I call, every person we put on the field -- everything we do is geared to trying to win the game. Everything we do. There’s nothing where we’re trying to be clever. There’s nothing where we’re trying to be cute. I don’t care about any of that stuff. I don’t call a play, I don’t put a player on the field unless I think it helps us win. Period.”

Is it possible to flip it so that Denard’s quarterback and Devin’s the skill player? “Anything’s possible.”

Seems like Devin’s been getting a few more snaps every week. Is there a target number? “No. I don’t count snaps. We have a plan for whatever we’re going to do. We put them on the field as we see fit, but there’s no pitch count. Nothing like that. We don’t care about that stuff.”

Looked like there were some plays where Denard came off the field and Devin had some plays to himself. Are those plays designed just for Devin? “Yeah, some of that was when Denard got banged up. He got banged up and I think that was what mostly happened. There may have been a play or two, but it was mostly that.”

How much has uncertainty at left guard affected the offensive line? “I don’t think that’s a big deal. Mike Schofield has done a nice job. There’s nice competition there. If you lost three or four lineman, that probably would hurt you.”

How different are Schofield and Barnum? “Very similar. Both athletic kids. They can move, you know. Play inside the box pretty well. Smart kids, both of them. Very similar games. It’s a good question, because they bring about the same thing to the table. Athleticism, some toughness.” Is playing time determined purely by production? “Yeah, it’s like at running back. You have a couple running backs and no one’s standing out, so we make them compete and let them play, and until somebody does, you do it the way you do it. You’d like to get a cast of characters that you’re going to play with in place every week. Sometimes it simply doesn’t work that way as much as you’d like to do that.”

You say the running backs haven’t differentiated themselves. Is what we see on the field the same as what you see in practice then? “Pretty much, yeah. I would say that’s accurate. As we go through this thing, we’re going to try and get more opportunities to get them opportunities, if that makes any sense to you. As the season goes on, the quarterback, who’s a runner on our offense, we’re always looking for chacnes to take pressure off him. We’ve been able to do that in a couple of games. It’s been great. We weren’t able to that last game, but we have been able to do that in several games, and that’s been good. We’ll still try to do that if we possibly can. Like I said, when you guys first asked me about this whole thing when I got here, I’d like to take the pressure off Denard Robinson running the ball.”

Greg Mattison

Opening remarks: “Should I start out with something? Why don’t we just go ahead and ask questions.”

Can you talk about key things you tried to hone in on in the bye week? “Any time you get in the middle of the season and you don’t play as successful as you want on every snap, you have to address that during the bye week. For us it’s always been, and we’ve talked about this the first day we all met, when you’re a young team and an inexperienced team, you must be great at your fundamentals. Fundamentals start on defense with tackling. If you don’t tackle, you’re not going to have the success you should have. Along with that, it’s getting off blocks. We’re not a good enough team to have one guy make a tackle. Our deal so far this year has been a lot of guys getting to the football, and when guys aren’t reading their keys like they should, I don’t know if any team is, but we for sure aren’t good enough to take a false step and still get to the football. When you do that you get cut or you get a blocker on you, and now you’re down to one or two guys making the tackle rather than a defense making the tackle, so we’ve worked very very hard on our keys, on our footwork, on tackling, on delivering blows. Our guys have stayed out after they’ve hit the sled. We addressed all the things we want to build this defense on, and it’s the right time to do it in the middle of the season.”

Hoke said at times the defense was tentative and players were more concerned with not making mistakes than being aggressive. Is that something you saw on film? “I’m not being disrespectful -- I really don’t want to talk about the last game that much because Purdue’s ahead of us. In general, any time we play tentative, we aren’t good enough to do that. It could be this week coming up, it could have been four weeks ago -- we have to be a team that goes as hard as it can go, and if it’s being not tentative, that’s right. We can’t. We’re not talented enough to do that. You better be coming off as hard as you can, you better be punching as hard as you can. That’s something we’ll have to address next week and the week after and the week after. That’s going to be our deal on defense.”

What do you see from Purdue’s offense that worries you? “I never say anything worries me. I would rather say, ‘What do I think they’re pretty good at?’ I think the one thing they do a really good job of is they get to the perimeter. I think their backs are fast. They seem very very quick. They have a lot of ways that they try to get to the perimeter with the ball. I think they’re a good football team. I watched them real close and they make plays. They’ve got some guys that make plays, and winning that game they did last week -- that wasn’t a fluke. That was a good job by them. I think they’re going to be a team, just like every game we play, we’re going to have to bring our A game. We’re going to have to play better, and we’re going to have to play better, and they’re the next one.”

Are you going to defend them differently depending on which quarterback is playing? “Not really. They run their offense. They don’t change the offense when Marve’s in there, for example. No, it’s their offense. I think they put them in there maybe because -- up until last week, probably -- they thought, well they’re even. Let’s see which one [does better]. But it’s not a change of pace for our guys. It’s their offense.”

Formationally, do you think their offense is similar to what you do on offense? “I think there’s some components of it. I think there’s some of the read option. There’s some of the read zone. There’s some similarities to it.” Does it help that they’re similar? “Oh yeah. We’re getting fast looks if our offense runs that type of scheme. Instead of the scout team, you’re getting pretty good guys coming at you. So that’s good.”

This team didn’t start the season well, but they’ve gotten better. Do you see their evolution on tape? “I watched their early games that aren’t even on our cut-ups. The Middle Tennesse, the Rice, the real early games. They did some real good things in those games. Those games could have been wins. Middle Tennessee was. And Middle Tennessee is a pretty good team, especially on defense. There’s no lack of respect, believe me. I hope there’s a time when I can sit in here and say, ‘We’re going to be fine.’ Now, we have to play great football on defense. Every time we go out on the field, it’s got to be play after play after play.”

Have you ever said you’re going to be okay? “Oh yeah. Oh yeah. It’s fun, too. It’s really fun coaching that.”

Is there a battle between Blake Countess and Troy Woolfolk? “I don’t know if you’d say if there’s a battle. I think you’re seeing Blake be what you hope freshmen do, and that’s improve and show that they can help you win, and therefore you have another one. I don’t know if there’s a battle. Like we do up front and like we do at linebacker, you’d love to rotate guys a little more. Blake shows that he can do some things, and he has to continue to play at the level we want him to. A lot of times what happens with freshmen is they get in there and they have a little success and they go, ‘This is easy.’ Well, it’s not. It’s not easy, because there’s somebody that’s going to try and beat you every time you go out there. It’s a good deal to be able to rotate guys like that.”

What’s the main thing you need to do to shore up perimeter defense? “We have to be a lot more physical on blocks. It’s got to be a mindset that when a wide receiver tries to block you, that’s an insult. And you better be so physical that you can’t just shadow him. You have to try to go through him and physically beat him and get off the block. We haven’t done that. It’s been too many times where we’re just kind of caught on it and trying to pull off it rather than attacking it and going through it and getting off.”

Your defensive players said they were out-toughed by Michigan State. Does that mean your group is more eager to improve now because they admitted that? “I think when a player says that, he has a lot of pride. I don’t think he’s going to say he was out-athletic-ed. The bottom line -- football is a very very tough game. I think in any game you aren’t successful at, it’s usually because -- especially when you’re at Michigan -- it’s usually because you didn’t maybe play as physical as you should have. You guys have been following Michigan for a long time. I think you know that. There’s an attitude and there’s a way you have to play here. With the teams we play, you better be phsyical, and if you’re not successful, that’s usually what happens.”

So was that a bit of a wake-up call? “I don’t know if we’re in a position to say we got a wake-up call. We’re scrapping each week to try and play better defense. I hope that they don’t think that they arrived. I know that’s not the case with them. I think it’s more of a reinforcement that you have to do these things to be a successful defense, and sometimes I think a player might say, ‘Now I just get to the ball.’ Well no no. You don’t just get to the ball. You have to do A, B, and C before you get to the football. It doesn’t matter if you’re the greatest player in the world or you’re average. It doesn’t matter, wherever you are in there, you have to go through the proper techniques to get to the football.”

Hoke said Frank Clark and Brennen Beyer might get more playing time. “Yeah that’s the other good thing about an off week. Guys that have kind of caught your eye -- now you’re seven weeks, if they’re ready to start playing, you can kind of spend more time with them instead of getting ready for a team, and you can say, on this defense you need to make sure you do this. When they’re not really in the picture, you’re spending time with the other guys. I think you’re going to see Brennen Beyer and Frank Clark play a little more. Now you’re going to find out when they get in there. They’ve shown some real flashes in practice, but you all know that’s different out there. That little mistake that the coach jumps the guy about on the practice field could cost you the game in a game. You have to make sure they’re reliable.”

Does that change your rotation at D-line or linebacker? “No. Our rotation is our rotation, and the guys that are going to play are going to play. They’re all the same guys. It may allow you to get a little more speed, for example. Jake Ryan played 61 plays last game. I blame myself for that. I think Brennen was ready to get some reps last week and we were getting some three-and-outs, we were getting off the field. If you can find a guy to go in for five plays to get him a little bit of a break, it’s not changing the rotation, but it might get him a little breath. So that’s what we’re trying to do.”

Hoke mentioned that Will Heininger had a good game. What has his development been like to get to that point? “It’s been technique as far as I’m concerned. He’s always been a big, strong guy. And he was coming off a knee. He probably had a setback that way. I didn’t know then. I’ve seen him buy in to what we’re trying to do, and because of his confidence and the technique, it’s allowed him to use his strength, and he’s become a lot more physical a football player. I think when you’re not sure of yourself, you’re just trying to get through it, where now he sees it all. He’s an intelligent young man, so things are coming together for him a little bit.”

Will Heininger has moved inside and Ryan Van Bergen moved outside. “We just felt that Ryan is a better five-technique than he is inside. He’s a lot more comfortable there, and that’s why he played that last game, but he started out the season that way, too. Will can kind of play anywhere, so that made it easy that way.”

What part of Will’s technique has improved the most? “I think staying low. I think, like we always talk about with our defensive line, they’ve got to be able to punch, and he’s really starting to do that now. He’s a strong, strong kid, so that’s what you need to do to play defensive line, but he’s staying a lot lower now.”

Comments

Shakespeare

October 27th, 2011 at 10:55 AM ^

I reserved judgement until now, but is it even debateable that the offense has taken two or three steps back from where we were last year? And if you look at our least succesful plays of the season and most of the formations that have led to turnovers - they almost all have one thing in common... Denard under center... I think that in the current climate a spread option offense is the most efficient. Say what you will about RR but in his three years he put together a hell of a firepowered offense. We went from having tons of NFL talent (including the #1 overall pick) and scoring 14 points per game to having no NFL talent and scoring 35 points per game. If that doesn't scream schematics then I don't know what does. THE SPREAD OPTION SCHEME WORKS!!! So if it ain't broke why fix it? Let's go back to the offensive gameplan we used last season. Fire Al Borges and bring back Calvin Magee.

2plankr

October 27th, 2011 at 12:53 PM ^

Yes it is very debateable.  We are #15 in offensive FEI, and top 10 in YPP, IIRC.  We are also 6-1.  And if not for a very cheap shot, denard would be healthy.  That is at worst one step back.  I'm not going to respond to the rest of your post.

Shakespeare

October 27th, 2011 at 3:51 PM ^

obviously the last sentence is a joke. but in all seriousness i'm going to be very disappointed to see our offense regress to a typical boring power game i-formation old school scheme. i think the spread has been proven to work, it is exciting to watch, and attracts amazingly athletic recruits.

uncleFred

October 27th, 2011 at 4:21 PM ^

As Denard got banged up offensive production fell off. It's pretty simple, if you run your QB that much into Big Ten defenses he's going to get hurt. That's going to slow him down and he is going to get hurt more. Eventually he's not playing. or is too banged up to play effectively and you're done. 

When you have a QB with Denard's talent, the spread has the potential to win any given game. It does not have the potential to consistantly win ten or more games a season when you play the typical Big Ten Schedule.

I'd just as soon have a more traditional offense and get back to competing for Big Ten championships. That said, if the coaches can figure out how to get a little more effectiveness from the OL, you could see 35 yards per game without running Denard so much, he can pass when he has protection and settles down.

 

Reader71

October 28th, 2011 at 7:41 AM ^

But our 14-point teams won a ton of games, while Rich Rod's 35-point teams lost almost all of theirs. I know you're talking offense, but come on man. This team is way better than last years, despite the regression on offense.

We've had precisely 1 bad game, and we had a chance at that one until the end.

Why not go back to last year's scheme? Our coaches don't really know it, for one. And despite that, they are good enough coaches to realize where their bread is buttered, which is why you are seeing a spread offense almost exclusively, although with much less zone read.

NoVaWolverine

October 27th, 2011 at 11:29 AM ^

My favorite quote, among many:

"It’s got to be a mindset that when a wide receiver tries to block you, that’s an insult. And you better be so physical that you can’t just shadow him. You have to try to go through him and physically beat him and get off the block. "

Great stuff.