I Am Not A Bystander But I Am Standing By Comment Count

Brian

2/2/2013 – Michigan 52, Indiana 63 – 16-5, 8-1 Big Ten

imageimage

Stauskas was barely involved, but they don't take pictures of guys hanging around at the three point line. [Chris Howell/Hoosier Scoop]

There was a second-half possession on which Nik Stauskas stood in the corner and watched, hands on hips. Zak Irvin—this team has more guys apparently missing a C in their names than any in the country, where is that on Kenpom—banged in a three pointer that I barely noticed before it went in, because I was distressed and looking at Stauskas to rescue things. He did not.

The only thing that was unique about this particular possession was the hands. The standing eventually became standard. This was because Yogi Ferrell, Indiana's lightning quick, generously-listed-at-six-foot-even point guard, was guarding him. Ferrell started out in much the same way as Gary Harris did, denying heavily on the perimeter, and for whatever reason back cuts against this behavior are infrequent nowadays. Michigan did not even attempt one. When Stauskas did get the ball he felt harried enough to dump it to someone else most of the time.

Stauskas was effectively shut off for most of the first half until late, when he attempted to back Ferrell down on one possession, and drive by him on another. The post-up resulted in a shot that was well off; the drive ended with a charge call as Stauskas extended his arm.

And that was that, really.

I thought that Stauskas would be pissed and Beilein would do something to get his star into the game. Over the past couple years, Michigan has an excellent track record when it comes to storming out of the locker room at the half and putting it on the opponent. There was not a hint of that in this game. The second half largely followed the first. Other than a couple of nice passes, Stauskas's contribution was limited to a couple of jacked late-clock shots and the standing around.

-------------------------

In Stauskas's stead, things fell on LeVert, Walton, and Robinson, far less efficient players who went about the business of being less efficient.

This was massively frustrating. Cat-quick or not, ball screens require hard decisions on the part of a defense. When Michigan did get into the Stauskas pick and roll offense a couple times in the second half, Michigan got quality looks at the basket. I have a ton of faith in John Beilein's overall genius because I have eyes frequently applied to basketball games, and seeing the lack of answers on his part was distressing. So, too, was Stauskas's growing passivity.

This was the second time this year that Stauskas had been eliminated from the offense. The first time was against Duke, and that was another listless loss where Michigan was tagging along behind the opponent with a series of LeVert drives that never seemed like they would come together into the surge Michigan needed to take the lead. Cut off the head and the rest of the team flails; unlike Trey Burke, opponents have shown an ability to do that with Stauskas.

Whether that's because of an inherent difference in their attitudes or just the fact that Burke brought the ball up most of the time while Stauskas gets involved in the offense after lining up on the wing, I don't know, but somehow, some way Michigan has to get the ball in the right hands. They are not good enough on defense to get away with nights featuring six shots from the man.

Bullets

One call. I didn't have much problem with the refereeing in this one despite it being an Assembly Hall game. There were a couple of things each way that were wrong, sure. I was too busy being incensed about Stauskas's lack of involvement to really get any lather up about officiating.

But, man, if Derrick Walton gets what looked like a blazingly obvious charge call on Ferrell, this game changes significantly. That would have been Ferrell's second, knocking him out for about eight minutes, both freeing up Stauskas and removing 85% of Indiana's offense. I'm not sure what else Walton is supposed to do there: he was moving with Ferrell, square to the shooter, and got plowed in the chest. Ferrell got the same call a few minutes later, and it was the right one.

I have no idea what a charge is anymore, so I am now qualified to referee college basketball.

(The other thing that drove me nuts was Michigan getting a blocking call on a flop a few minutes after Indiana's flop didn't draw one.)

Our defensive stopper isn't stopping anything of late. LeVert draws the opposition's best perimeter scorer, and the results have been grim. Ferrell blazed the nets in this one, as did Gary Harris in the MSU game. While Purdue's guards didn't do much, they are Purdue.

After Ferrell's third late clock shot I started getting really frustrated with LeVert allowing Ferrell to take virtually uncontested jumpers, and then thought back to last year's Wisconsin game… why doesn't LeVert ever get a hand in anyone's face? He's six inches taller than Ferrell, he should be able to contest his shots. Instead there's a lack of awareness that leads to plenty of rise-and-fire threes that look like bad shots until you see the replay.

This could have been a super-ugly win you exhale and mutter something about road games after, except Indiana kept hitting shots they had to jack up with about two seconds on the shot clock. (This was a glacial 55 possession game.) Michigan's problem is that they let Indiana look like Jordan Taylor-era Wisconsin; almost all of their late jacked shots were actually decent looks. Compare that to the three Stauskas had to take from about 30 feet.

image

[Chris Howell/Hoosier Scoop]

Morgan up, except for the one thing. Jordan Morgan had an excellent game with ten rebounds, five of them offensive, to go with two blocked shots and two makes. His miss was blocked by Vonleh and immediately put back up by Morgan for two. His rotation on defense was part of the many, many late-clock situations Indiana found itself in, and the resulting makes were not really on him. He was pretty great.

The main exception, of course, was the free throw line, where Morgan was 1 of 5 with a critical missed front end late. That dropped his season percentage almost ten points and as the clock ticked down it was impossible to not look at Michigan's score and add in the missing two or three points even though the team's overall percentage at the line was about average.

Walton: improving, verging on improved. Thirteen points, six of them at the line. Walton's FT percentage has gone up six points in the last couple games and he's consistently chipping double digits more often than not. He's still not up to the task of taking over games in the fashion Michigan needed with Stauskas marginalized, but at this point a solidly productive night is the expectation.

Taking over games… is just not in the cards for GRIII. Like the Duke game, when Michigan was out of its element in the second half the burden fell on Caris. This was due in part to two or three ugly possessions earlier when Robinson tried to create and ended up with a bad shot or a turnover. Chastened, Robinson receded into the background again unless there was a transition opportunity.

It just is what it is. Robinson's NBA draft hype was always built on his ability to jump really high, not his skill level.

Spike limitations. This was a bad, bad matchup for Albrecht. He came in, got smoked a couple times by Ferrell, and then got yanked. He had a period of time in the second half where both he and Walton were in; he chased someone else around.

Comments

KBLOW

February 3rd, 2014 at 1:00 PM ^

So many small things that the team could've done that all would have given them a win or put them in a position for it to be a one possession game in the final minute.

But all in all, replay that game and 9 times out of 10 and Stauskas could've stood around just like yesterday and we win because Ferrell isn't going to hit 3's like he did, wide open or not.

bronxblue

February 3rd, 2014 at 1:20 PM ^

From the first couple of minutes, this just felt like a weird game.  Indiana slowed down the pace, UM couldn't get shots to fall, and Stauskas was marginalized in the same vein as Duke but weirder since at least with Duke you have super-athletic, NBA-type players on him.  Yogi may be a great scorer, but he's seemingly not nearly big enough to really be able to shut down Stauskas like he did.  The lack of other scoring is concerning, but sometimes that happens in games like this when the shots are just off.

Still, nobody expected this team to go undefeated in the conference, so I'm fine with a tough road loss if it had to be one.  I suspect that Nebraska will be another tough out, but I have faith that this team will rebound successfully given the fact it took a pretty insanely-poor shooting performance by UM to lose a close game.  

The Claw

February 3rd, 2014 at 1:22 PM ^

A Bullet for Free Throws needs to be included.  They couldn't make one late on the 1 and 1's.  Could have kept cutting it to 4 instead of Indiana extending it out of reach.  But D is dreadful. That's what they need to shore up or they'll be bounced very quickly in both tournaments.

BlackOps2ForLife

February 3rd, 2014 at 1:57 PM ^

A tough loss to swallow considering Indiana isn't that great of a team, but clearly not a hurtful loss, so long as M keeps winning. Nebraska is a must win and they have to get at least one win out of the Iowa and Ohio games - preferably Iowa considering they are a better team, but I won't cry if we beat Ohio instead since they are who they are.

ak47

February 3rd, 2014 at 2:45 PM ^

This game highlighted what Stauskas is lacking to take his game to the next level, he doesn't get seperation from good defenders.  A truly elite player takes yogi or gary harris off the dribble at least a few times and gets some points that way.  When facing an elite defender stauskas either needs screens or gets turned into a jump shooter exclusively.  That's fine because most teams don't have elite defenders and so he is still a great college player, but its the sort of thing that could cause him to fall down draft boards.

badbundy

February 3rd, 2014 at 10:31 PM ^

More often than not, when the ball is in Stauskas hands something good happens. When your best player becomes over matched individually, it's the Coaches job to draw up sets to get him involved. Coach B doesn't seem to want to do that. Or he wants to save those sets for down the road when it means more. Also how about ball denial? When yogi gave it up we should never have let him get it back. It was a lackluster performance on the players and coaches.