Fluck Comment Count

Brian

9/13/2008 – Michigan 17, Notre Dame 35 – 1-2

minor-fumble

You either accept this or you don’t as it relates to football and, more generally, life: random events occur without reason. Around these parts, the following things are chalked up the general bloody-mindedness of the universe:

  • unforced fumbles from Boubacar Cissoko, Michael Shaw, Steven Threet (x2), Brandon Minor, Donovan Warren
  • Notre Dame fumbles miraculously bouncing back to the fumbler
  • Greg Mathews’ borderline touchdown catch—which, IMO, was going to stand as called either way—being ruled incomplete
  • Kevin Grady’s borderline fumble not being ruled down for forward progress
  • some questionable officiating
  • a pounding rain descending upon the players after a number of above events had combined to provide an 11-point deficit.

Michigan, of course, actively participated in a number of these events—in fact, they were the only participants in most of the fumbles—but suggesting that these represent a disturbing trend (or, if you’re Pat Haden, some sort of mystical ND juju) is a stretch.

Let’s appeal to historical precedent:

The Wolverines hadn't lost four fumbles since 1995. They hadn't had six turnovers since 1992.

Let’s further point out that year-to-year turnover numbers have very little correlation and that fumble luck (or “fluck,” a terrific coinage from Statistically Speaking) is just that: luck.

You can’t really say this because the “BUT” is enormous, but: Michigan significantly outplayed Notre Dame on a down by down basis but shot itself in the foot every two seconds. Yes, this is sort of like saying “these cookies are delicious except for the arsenic.”  Yes, Notre Dame was relieved of the need to outplay Michigan on a down-by-down basis because they were spotted a 21-0 lead and a second-half rainstorm and could be content to run some clock and punt. But I’ll take a team that looks competent except for a few huge glaring errors over one that can’t complete a pass, and if the teams played again next week the line would be further in Michigan’s favor. [Rakes points out this is a confusing sentence. The team that can't complete a pass is Michigan in their first two games. I rejiggered this paragraph and it didn't come out quite right. -ed] Massive negative events have a distorting effect on game results out of proportion to their usefulness as predictors.

Some of these major negative events are not purely random and are going away. Kevin Grady is a fumbler. The execution errors that led to the Minor fumble will remain rife. Stevie Brown has moved from possible liability to definite liability. Carson Butler.

Others—many others—were random events highly unlikely to recur: Yakety Sax fumbles caused by a wet ball, the distribution of close calls in ND’s favor*, Brandon Harrison kicking a fumble otherwise surrounded by M players back to the wide receiver.

Since I am not an emotionless robot I screamed my half-dozen profanities and fantasized about breaking stuff during the game, but when the red mist passed I was strangely pleased with an 18-point loss to what looks to be a meh-at-best team. This year was never going to end in glory anyway. What’s more important is the development of the offense, the emergence of Sam McGuffie, and the amazing one-week turnaround of Steven Threet.

The most damaging part of the whole Terrelle Pryor/BJ Daniels/Justin Feagin fiasco was not necessarily the loss of player X or player Y but the crimp it put in Rodriguez’s development schedule. Until about 3:45 Saturday it appeared Michigan would have to suffer through this year with the Threet/Sheridan duo, then start all over in 2009 with freshmen at the most critical position on the field.

It was at that point Threet threw a third-and-long slant, moved the chains, and embarked on a 16-23 day in extremely unfavorable conditions. Though he fumbled twice and was partially culpable for the Minor fumble, he also looked like an actual Division I quarterback, and in ways that even a potentially horrible Notre Dame defense couldn’t distort: he threw balls to receivers. He made good decisions. He was a freshman in his first road game, played in Hurricane Katrina, and averaged 7.6 YPA.

Yeah, he’ll probably regress, probably play well only in fits and starts, etc., etc. He’ll also go into next year a threat to keep his starting job, giving Michigan a third shot at quarterback competence. That’s more relevant for the rest of this year and the next three than a slippery ball and Notre Dame waking up the Willingham echoes.

*(this is not to say that any of the calls were wrong, but virtually everything that could have gone either way went to ND; over time that’s unsustainable.)

BULLETS THAT ARE APPARENTLY SLATHERED IN BUTTER OR SOMETHING

  • Hey, great, Carson Butler, let’s take a swing at a player. Butler’s provided almost nothing positive this year and should be encouraged to enter the draft this spring.
  • One inexplicable carryover from the Carr era: the occasional Carlos Brown ISQD that goes for one yard.
  • Speaking of Brown:

    Another junior running back, Carlos Brown, said he was prepared for a bigger role in the game.

    "It is what it is," said Brown. … Asked whether he'll be used more as a running back in the future, Brown said, "Hey, I'm clueless. You have to talk to coach Rod about all that."

    This sounds like a guy who is not happy with his playing time.

  • No, I don’t think Michigan was taking any particular risk by putting a couple freshmen back to return kicks. They returned kicks in high school and it’s not like there’s anything different about it in college. Usually a KO fumble means some crappy field position; Michigan just got extraordinarily unlucky to have a muff like that.

  • Speaking of muffs: the Donovan Warren punt return thingy has to be over, doesn’t it?
  • The defensive line was somewhat disappointing, but on the long bomb they had eight guys in to block and a two-man route. That’s on the secondary.
  • Stevie Brown turning a 10-yard slant into 60 yards by overrunning a guy Donovan Warren had brought to a near-stop was backbreaking.
  • Also backbreaking: Grady fumble.
  • Actually you could pick like eight different plays if we wanted to keep going.
  • Whee!

Comments

SpartanDan

September 16th, 2008 at 11:32 AM ^

... between losing because of talent, bad breaks, etc. and losing because of possibly the dumbest playcall in history. In fact, the only one I can think of that rivals it was John L. hurrying the FG unit out right before halftime at Ohio State instead of spiking the ball and not having to be in such a hurry that you end up with only 10 players out there, get the FG blocked, and go into the half up 3 instead of 13.

I was being partially facetious to say that one call is enough to call him a horrible coach - I meant it simply as an example of the worst of his stupidity. He's not John L. or Bobby Williams, but his "decided schematic advantage" seems to continually materialize for the other team instead.

Tauro

September 15th, 2008 at 2:43 PM ^

Nice work, Brian.  I too came out seeing more positives despite the serious case of fumblitis we witnessed.  That should be corrected.  I'd sure like to see one of these RB's take a serious step up to be McGuffie's backup.  Someone needs to own that role so that I don't cringe everytime he goes off the field, and to give R-Rod a second option on plays where both are in the game.  Can we just clone him?

I like McGuffie's game-by-game improvement thus far.  He is far more comfortable now in the offense and will be a threat for the rest of the year, but I fear defenses will focus on him unless another RB steps up.

I've also been impressed with Odoms so far.  I think he made a few nice grabs this game considering the weather.

sdogg1m

September 15th, 2008 at 3:29 PM ^

for sixty yards was a backbreaker but the fumble by Grady killed us. I thought it should have been whistled down and I kept wondering why it wasn't. However, given Grady's past fumbling habits; I am not willing to put sole blame on a bad call.

hat

September 15th, 2008 at 8:24 PM ^

Desert Blue, Grady was healthy (as far as any of us know) his first two years and saw substantial playing time - and looked about the same as he does now.  (Besides, sports medicine has improved to a point at which players can make full recoveries from ACL surgery.)  The guy's just not that good.  Evidently, he physically peaked at an early age and that's why he seemed so dominant in high school.