January 13th, 2011 at 3:53 PM ^
I'm not that kind of guy but someone else may just come on here and tell you to check 9 posts down and see that "Barwis to SDSU" is on the board and within that thread is at least 3 mentions of Devin's tweet.
January 13th, 2011 at 3:56 PM ^
Frontpaged
January 13th, 2011 at 3:55 PM ^
Sorry about that.
January 13th, 2011 at 3:57 PM ^
now that the board is back to normal... things are running at a faster pace and the side board gets movin. no biggie. I didn't even see the front page reference since I haven't been looking through several threads.
January 13th, 2011 at 3:55 PM ^
Yeah the players are going to miss Barwis. I think the Mealer family will be the most affected by his departure.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:05 PM ^
Whatever. The players that are worth anything will respond. Barwis is undoubtedly good but that doesn't mean anything unless the players are motivated to maximize their time with him. In that same vain I think Brick Mealer will be fine wherever he goes. He's certainly shown the constitution to do so. Besides... why is everyone sucking Barwis's dick about that? It was Mealer who did it. And for that I have a role model for life!
January 13th, 2011 at 4:09 PM ^
Relax.
January 13th, 2011 at 5:00 PM ^
Wow, it's a trifecta. Typos (Brock, not brick), misspellings ("vein" not "vain"), and my favorite part, the insinuation that acknowledging the fact that players will miss Barwis equals blowing him. You clearly have nothing to add to the discourse here. Go away
January 13th, 2011 at 6:10 PM ^
It would be awesome to have a player consume an entire brick in front of the opposing bench. If that doesn't scare anyone, nothing will.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:07 PM ^
fail.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:13 PM ^
What exactly do you refute about my previous statement? (besides typos... I'm still getting used to this Imac)
January 13th, 2011 at 4:21 PM ^
No attempt was made to cheerlead, but you couldn't help but be an ass.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:29 PM ^
Exactly and succinctly? How so?
January 13th, 2011 at 5:46 PM ^
You said that those who support Barwis suck his dick. I'm pretty sure Barwis wouldn't appreciate that.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:15 PM ^
That DG's tweet seems to confirm that he will be staying. I know there wasn't much chatter about him leaving, but given our QB situation this is good news.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:18 PM ^
I think it's great news! That kid's a stud. Tressel took over and won a NC with Craig Krenzel! DG is way better than that!
January 13th, 2011 at 4:49 PM ^
one of the few that was a little underwhelmed with the product Barwis put on the field.
slim and trim, maybe quicker, but they were weak, eveywhere.
January 13th, 2011 at 5:05 PM ^
A lot of that weakness probably stems from the fact that so many underclassmen played. I realize that the Barwis love was a little over-the-top sometimes, but you can't blame the fact that our 18 and 19 year-olds got pushed around by 20 and 21 year-olds on Barwis.
January 13th, 2011 at 5:20 PM ^
dammit I thought this was going to be confirmation that Denard is staying
January 13th, 2011 at 5:29 PM ^
There are many strength coaches, but he was ours. The incoming strength coach will soon be the Michigan strength coach, not just any strength coach. Mike Barwis will be remembered by his associates, by his fans, and by his players. He gave to the university, as did Mike Gittleson before him.
Edit; removed "peers", what was I thinking?
January 13th, 2011 at 6:29 PM ^
Got a ton of hype and I'm wondering why.
I know the underclassmen thing hurt a bit. It's hard to turn an 18 year old kid into a holy hell terror clown by the age of 18.5.
But our upperclassment weren't that impressive--and sorry, but really, S&C guys as rock starz?
The team was bigger and stronger under Gittleson and the teams UM played looked BUFFED out while our guys looked like they were auditioning for parts in "Rent."