Statistical Analysis of Defense During B10 Games - Saturday Was The Best Game Of The Year *Yards Per Drive Now Reflected*

Submitted by Matt EM on

I've seen a few diaries analyze the defense in terms of total yardage, points allowed, etc. As I watched our defense on Saturday without looking at total yardage and points, I couldn't help but to think that this was the best performance by our young defense during conference play to date. I know that may sound foolish considering that we gave up nearly 600 yards and 65 points.

However, I don't think total yardage and points are necessarily the best measurements to evaluate our defensive performances. Those measurements fail to account for how quickly we score on offense, our special teams(or lack of in this case) play, turnovers, and starting field position for the opposition.

I decided to evaluate the defense in a more comprehensive manner, using several statistics to get a "big picture" view of the defense. I used several statistics to evaluate the defense during B10 play:

1.) % of stops(defined as non-scoring drives by the opposition)

 2.) % of punts forced by the defense

3.) % of 3-and-outs forced by the defense

4.) Points per drive allowed by the defense

5.) Average starting field position by the opposition

6.) Yard Per Drive By Opposition

 

Here's how B10 play stacks up

 Game 1(Indiana):

a.)7 stops on 13 drives(53.8%) - 2 stops were forced by turnover on downs

b.) 4 punts on 13 drives(30.8%)

c.) One 3-and-out(7.7%)

d.) 35 points on 13 drives = 2.69 points per drive

e.) Average starting position by Indiana = 26.31 yard line(Indiana Territory)

f.) 568 yards on 13 drives = 43.69 yards per drive

 

Game 2(MSU)

a.) 4 stops on 10 drives(40%)

b.) 4 punts on 10 drives(40%)

c.) Two 3-and-outs on 10 drives(20%)

d.) 34 points on 10 drives = 3.4 points per drive

e.) Average starting field position by MSU = 30.1 yard line(MSU Territory)

f.) 536 yards on 10 drives = 53.6 yards per drive

 

Game 3(Iowa)

a.) 5 stops on 11 drives(45.5%)

b.) 5 punts on 11 drives(45.5%)

c.) Five 3-and-outs on 11 drives(45.5%)

d.) 38 points on 11 drives = 3.45 points per drive

e.) Iowa average starting field position = 38.09 yard line(Iowa Territory)

f.) 383 yards on 11 drives = 34.82 yards per drive

 

Game 4(Penn State)

a.) 2 stops on 9 drives(22.2%) - That is a very ugly number

b.) 2 punts on 9 drives(22.2%)

c.) One 3-and-out(11.1%)

d.) 41 points on 9 drives = 4.56 points per drive

e.) Average Starting Field Position for Penn State = 37.78 yard line(Penn State Territory)

f.) 435 Yards on 9 drives = 48.33 yards per drive

 

Game 5(Illinois) - Regulation Only

a.) 8 stops on 14 drives(57.14%) including 1 fumble and missed FG - best % during B10

b.) 6 punts on 14 drives(42.75%)  - 2nd best percentage of the B10 season

c.) Four 3-and-outs(28.57%) - 2nd best percentage of the B10 season

d.) 45 points on 14 drives = 3.21 points per drive - 2nd best ratio during B10 play

e.) Average starting field position for Illinois = 40.43 yard line(Illinois Territory) - TO's and special teams absolutely killed us

 f.) 486 yards on 14 drives = 34.71 yards per drive

 

Recap:

  Stop%                Punt%         3-and-out%            Points/Drive            Starting Field Position

illinois(57.14)    Iowa(45.5)    Iowa(45.5)            Ind(2.69)                   Ind(26.31 yard line)

Ind(53.8)            ill(42.75)        ill(28.57)               ill(3.21)                      MSU(30.1 yard line)

Iowa(45.5)         MSU(40)        MSU(20)            MSU(3.4)                   PSU(37.78 yard line)

MSU(40)             Ind(30.8)       PSU(11.1)            Iowa(3.45)                 Iowa(38.09 yard line)

PSU(22.2)         PSU(22.2)      Ind(7.7)                 PSU(4.56)                 ill(40.43 yard line)

 

**Yards Per Drive**

Illinois(34.71 Yards per Drive)

Iowa(34.82 Yards per Drive)

Indiana(43.69 Yards per Drive)

Penn State(48.33 Yards Per Drive)

MSU(53.6 Yards Per Drive)

 

What does all this tell us:

 

I'm not foolish enough to believe we have a defense that is even approaching slightly below average, however, I do think we've made some improvement during 2 of the past 3 weeks with PSU being the outlier for entire season. When you consider that the defense had to work with the worst starting field position during B10 play, had to deal with 5 TO's by the offense, and yet the defense had their highest stop percentage of the year, I would tend to believe that they had their best performance of the year vs. Illinois.

**Now taking into account that the defense held Illinois to the lowest yards per drive during B10 play, I'm certainly convinced that Saturday was their best game of the year on the defensive side of the ball**

 

Moving forward:

We all understand the defense is going to be a liability for the rest of the year, but if we can play semi-adequate for the remainder of our games, we might be able to win 2 of the next 3(I know that's wishful thinking more than anything), but the defense doesn't have to be all world for us to win. I personally think that force punt % and 3-and-out % are the 2 biggest indicators of defensive success above, and if we can get that number between 45-55%, I think we have a chance to win most games. Essentially, if the defense can stop the opposition half of the time, we should be in a good position to win most games.

Mitch Cumstein

November 7th, 2010 at 10:34 AM ^

Its easy to point to the 65 points and say our defense was just being our defense.  But I was talking to a friend about it, if our D doesn't play solidly in the 1st quarter to minimize the damage of those turnovers, as well as get the stop in the 4th to force a punt, we don't win the game.  Thats all there is to it.  Without looking at the stats it was obvious to me that we played better on that side of the ball than we did against penn state.  I'm really excited to see them get even better in the last 4* games.

 

*Thats right, we're going bowling.

umchicago

November 7th, 2010 at 11:31 AM ^

my buddy and i at the game were scoring as if it was a tennis match from the beginning.  when we scored first "yes, we held serve".  when they then scored to tie "duece".  when we scored first in OT "ad in, yes".  when they scored the next two in a row "ad out, oh no".  then we took the lead and got the 2 pointer "double yes, ad in".  then when we stopped their 2 pt conversion "game, set, match".

king_kerridge

November 7th, 2010 at 10:34 AM ^

I had a similar feeling while I was at the game, our defense was consistently put in awful positions but managed to come up with stops when we needed it. There were the usual secondary meltdowns, but the D was did it's best to keep us alive. Great analysis. 

Vasav

November 7th, 2010 at 10:35 AM ^

Why are they out of 13 drives instead of 10 drives (like the other MSU data)? Was it just a typo?

 

Otherwise, really nice assesment. I'm looking forward to seeing the Mathlete's analysis on the game. Despite the score, I felt like our D did better on many of the fundamentals today than they had been. As you mentioned though, they've still got a long way to go.

WichitanWolverine

November 7th, 2010 at 10:41 AM ^

Thank you for pointing this out.  I thought our defense played really, really well yesterday considering the hand they were dealt.  When your offense scores fast and turns the ball over a ton, and your special teams give up horrible starting position, your defense is going to give up points no matter what.  Thank you for quantifying this.

umchicago

November 7th, 2010 at 11:35 AM ^

to say that our D played well yesterday shows how far this D has fallen.  they did not play well.  however, they did have their best game, imo, since UConn probably.

even though they got burned on some big plays (thanks LBs), they seemed to be flying around the field with more confidence.  attacking instead of sitting back and getting punched.  i think they can build and improve on this style of play.

wolverinenyc

November 7th, 2010 at 10:42 AM ^

Yeah I thought the D stepped up several times in this game when the O left us in bad positions. Generally you don't win games when you turn the ball over 5 times. I think what i liked most was seeing the fight in these guys. It's nice to see them not hang their heads and quit when bad things happen. Also, a number of young guys made individual plays that were crucial. The open field tackle avery made to force a FG try was huge. I think Vinopal had a TD saving hit at the 1 or so too. Demens was all over the place. Maybe with an extra month of practice for a bowl we'll really see the best of some of these guys that we've seen all year... GO BLUE!

FoundersFella

November 7th, 2010 at 11:00 AM ^

that next weekend this team is going to come out firing on all cylinders. I think that this game really was the game we have all been so desperately waiting for. This team is absolutely oozing w/ confidence right now, and a team w/ confidence is a very dangerous team to play. If they can pull out a W against Purdue next week I can only imagine the Confidence they would have coming home to play Wisconsin and if they can win that? well you know the rest. But watching this game I thought hands down it was the best our D has played in 2 years which is very strange given the outcome. 

nazooq

November 7th, 2010 at 11:06 AM ^

This is an excellent analysis.  It also demonstrates why people were so furious at the defensive coaching after the Penn State game (and rightfully so).  4.5 points per possession is -- dare I say it -- unaccetable.  Or to put it another way, almost impossible for even a great offense to overcome.  It's great to see the defense take some positive steps.  I hope they continue in the upcoming weeks.

umchicago

November 7th, 2010 at 11:14 AM ^

at this point stops >>>>>>>yardage.  i'm at the point where i call a FG a half a stop.  i can't believe i'm saying this.  sorry Bo.  the times they are a changin'.

m1jjb00

November 7th, 2010 at 11:35 AM ^

Interesting post, but if you're going to revisit this going forward, I'd suggest a change.  Criterion 2. is a repeat of 1, but treating turnovers generated negatively.  You should replace it with turnovers generated, which is better than forcing a punt.  To be sure, I wouldn't make much of the fact that the D generated more turnovers (1) this time than many of the other Big 10 games, though it too was a + versus other games.

Matt EM

November 8th, 2010 at 8:10 AM ^

Generating a TO is not necessarily better than forcing a punt - example: the defense intercepts a deep pass 50 yards from the line of scrimmage and is tackled at the spot of the interception for no return. Alternatively, the opposition punting from the same line of scrimmage with a 45 yard punt(which is generous), and if Gallon takes a fair catch, or even returns it for a 5 yard gain - these would both be better in terms of field position.