Why not Malzone?

Submitted by Clarence Beeks on

IF Peters and Speight can't go, why not Alex Malzone?  If we go back to the spring, the major positive upside on his game was his "smarts" (https://247sports.com/Article/Hamilton-previews-QB-depth-74917540).  That has been the consistent knock on O'Korn's game from what we've seen.  We know with this offense, and in this game in particular, being sound in decision-making is crucial. Yes, RS-Freshman asterisk applies to that, of course, but just tossing it out there for discussion (we can still do that here without instant snark, right?), because that's why not at this point...

MGoBoard

socalwolverine1

November 23rd, 2017 at 5:28 PM ^

If I'm being honest with myself, we're looking at six to ten points max out of either O'Korn or fill-in-the-blank. One or two scoring drives before we get shut down. So we need at least one pick six if we hope to win a low scoring defensive struggle.

Joined: 10/08/2012

MGoPoints: 1235

Carcajou

November 23rd, 2017 at 7:00 PM ^

Whoever plays QB, Michigan's receivers are going to have to step up and be faster and tougher on their releases; attack defender's leverage to stretch the defense; not give up on a play if everything isn't perfect; and more physical when the ball gets thrown to them. And CATCH THE DAMN BALL!

 

 

Joined: 02/26/2009

MGoPoints: 5783