John U Bacon on UM Football, Athletics
I'm surprised to see that this hasn't been posted, but Bacon has written a very thorough analysis of where things currently stand with respect to the AD and football program. It's a bit long, but worth the read:
October 24th, 2014 at 6:52 PM ^
He thinks Jimmy Harbaugh is going to coach. Thus....it must be so!
I have a medium disdain for Bacon because he seems to be willing to write a piece pouring fuel on the fire to advance his own name. In my summary the 3 & out largely was an expose piece targeting the "players" in the Athletic Dept's decision making tree on a coaching change, Lloyd Carr being one...who refused to be interviewed for the book. The 4 & long is a target piece aimed at Brandon initially sort of about money. These are gripping revelations if you are a serious fan, I get it. However.,
My brother and one of my other best friends played, for JUB as a coach of junior high baseball in Ann Arbor at Clague in the late 80s. They had choice words for the man, basically about how big of a dick he was to his players, day in and day out. So there's also that, my own little expose piece. The guy is willing to cut (with words written or verbal, meaning to obviously embarrass) people in front of their peers on all levels of life.
Moving on to Dave Brandon. It keeps coming up he watches game film. I don't get why this is an issue. If I'm DB I would damn sure want to know why my team was seemingly descending the staircase into suck. If I am a boss in any kind of organization, if there is a department which is performing poorly, I am not going to kick back in my windowed office and let someone else with a long list of excuses parlate on why. There's a mental leap here that says by default DB is dictating action and coaches are hustling to it. I don't buy that. Generally a CEO type doesn't want anything to do with technical details because they don't understand them, and when they open their mouth about knowlege of such things they quickly look like a fool to a large group. Their life and career is farthest from being built on details in any one area. Instead there's talk of direction and generalities and measurables with a few buzzwords thrown in. However they are investigators of sorts, trying to get their own handle on what's happening in their organization.
I wonder why we don't write hate pieces on Bill Martin. After all he dumped the fanbase on his head a couple years back. When the PSD was instituted, tickets which had been passed thru 3 generations of people to nice positions of field view, more or less like a prized heirloom were stripped from their possession and sold back to them at 3-5x the price, or to someone who could afford more, and they went from their nice seats way around to the end zone. It sorted the fanbase by income rather than how much time and energy they had invested over a sum of years. Argue what you want but I see it as dumping years of tradition in the name of pure money reasons. Yes, some southern schools invented this and Michigan had to follow suit. I guess those people who got their tickets yanked back to the endzone are just too old to get on the internet, har har har.
I suppose my post will be labeled tl;dr supporting DB and I should expect internet rocks incoming. I am a detail person with a bit of memory still left. The media in general is really good at painting devils and angels, because its forever self-sustaining. I think we are all a little closer to the center than its largely made out to be.
October 24th, 2014 at 7:04 PM ^
October 24th, 2014 at 7:09 PM ^
Find me better written coverage of the topic.
Also, did you even read "Three and Out"? How is it a "scandal piece"?
October 24th, 2014 at 8:27 PM ^
October 24th, 2014 at 8:48 PM ^
Is it scandal if it's true?
I liked Three and Out for the inside view of the team. The Lloyd stuff was in there and I don't deny it. But I also know that Bacon wouldn't have included it if he didn't 100% trust his sources.
As I recall, Three and Out did talk about some of RR's failures as well. Specifically, Groban-gate and RR's continued inability to understand how to relate publicly.
October 24th, 2014 at 10:13 PM ^
October 25th, 2014 at 9:12 AM ^
I re-read a few chapters of 3&out, and I'm okay with th idea that it is based on scandal. I think the term "Scandal Piece" is a little pejorative since Bacon is reporting based on his personal presence in those meetings. He's writing direct quotes. Obviously. there's a slant to it. However, there's reporting. It's actually pretty unique when you think about it.
As for Bacon's bias.... The article the OP posts seems very objective to me - at least more objective than some of his blog posts. It's main focus is that Prez Schlissel has a tough situation to deal with.
Also, remember, we're reading all of Bacon's stuff. This is rare. Usually, a blogger will write a post - as Bacon did on Brandon and Concussion-gate - and then national sites will reach out and say "can you write a similar piece that includes more context for a broader audience."
So, it's not exactly a vendetta in which he keeps writing the same thing. He's writing a similar topic, but for different audiences. It's the Internet, so we happen to be able to read it all.
October 25th, 2014 at 12:44 AM ^
October 25th, 2014 at 2:47 PM ^
This is a false dichotomy that you're making. Being a "writer" doesn't automatically make you "biased" and being a "journalist" doesn't automatically make you "balanced". Do you think the Free Press' coverage of Stretchinggate was all that "balanced"? Think guys like Rosenberg or Sharp are unbiased? I'm guessing that most on this blog would answer no. And newspapers and whatever other vehicle the "press" wants to use to disseminate the "news" always have to balance profit versus journalistic ethics. A bankrupt newspaper can't publish to get the news out, can it? So even if Bacon is trying to get pageclicks and readers, it doesn't mean he's not giving you an accurate picture of what is going on in the program.
October 25th, 2014 at 1:12 AM ^
October 25th, 2014 at 10:12 AM ^
John Q Public?