John U Bacon on UM Football, Athletics

Submitted by Michael on

I'm surprised to see that this hasn't been posted, but Bacon has written a very thorough analysis of where things currently stand with respect to the AD and football program. It's a bit long, but worth the read:

http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/road-saturday/201410/michigan-wolverines-football-dave-brandon-brady-hoke-mark-schlissel-regent

I dumped the Dope

October 24th, 2014 at 6:52 PM ^

He thinks Jimmy Harbaugh is going to coach.  Thus....it must be so!

I have a medium disdain for Bacon because he seems to be willing to write a piece pouring fuel on the fire to advance his own name.  In my summary the 3 & out largely was an expose piece targeting the "players" in the Athletic Dept's decision making tree on a coaching change, Lloyd Carr being one...who refused to be interviewed for the book.  The 4 & long is a target piece aimed at Brandon initially sort of about money.  These are gripping revelations if you are a serious fan, I get it. However.,

My brother and one of my other best friends played, for JUB as a coach of junior high baseball in Ann Arbor at Clague in the late 80s.  They had choice words for the man, basically about how big of a dick he was to his players, day in and day out.  So there's also that, my own little expose piece.  The guy is willing to cut (with words written or verbal, meaning to obviously embarrass) people in front of their peers on all levels of life.

Moving on to Dave Brandon.  It keeps coming up he watches game film.  I don't get why this is an issue.  If I'm DB I would damn sure want to know why my team was seemingly descending the staircase into suck.  If I am a boss in any kind of organization, if there is a department which is performing poorly, I am not going to kick back in my windowed office and let someone else with a long list of excuses parlate on why.  There's a mental leap here that says by default DB is dictating action and coaches are hustling to it.  I don't buy that.  Generally a CEO type doesn't want anything to do with technical details because they don't understand them, and when they open their mouth about knowlege of such things they quickly look like a fool to a large group.  Their life and career is farthest from being built on details in any one area.  Instead there's talk of direction and generalities and measurables with a few buzzwords thrown in.  However they are investigators of sorts, trying to get their own handle on what's happening in their organization.

I wonder why we don't write hate pieces on Bill Martin.  After all he dumped the fanbase on his head a couple years back.  When the PSD was instituted, tickets which had been passed thru 3 generations of people to nice positions of field view, more or less like a prized heirloom were stripped from their possession and sold back to them at 3-5x the price, or to someone who could afford more, and they went from their nice seats way around to the end zone.  It sorted the fanbase by income rather than how much time and energy they had invested over a sum of years.  Argue what you want but I see it as dumping years of tradition in the name of pure money reasons.  Yes, some southern schools invented this and Michigan had to follow suit.  I guess those people who got their tickets yanked back to the endzone are just too old to get on the internet, har har har. 

I suppose my post will be labeled tl;dr supporting DB and I should expect internet rocks incoming.  I am a detail person with a bit of memory still left.  The media in general is really good at painting devils and angels, because its forever self-sustaining.  I think we are all a little closer to the center than its largely made out to be.

 

BoFan

October 24th, 2014 at 7:04 PM ^

Please dont post Bacon's bashing of Brandon. He was thrown out by Brandon and so he has an axe to grind. All he does is bash Brandon. He has no more credibility. Also, since "Bo's lasting lessons" all he writes are scandal pieces. And like most of the media that is.in the gutter these days that gets him clicks. What a waste.

Reader71

October 24th, 2014 at 8:27 PM ^

I think the guy you're responding to is kind of out of line. Bacon is a good writer and a good journalist. But Three and Out was absolutely a scandal piece. Out of all of those thousands of words, the ones that interest people are the coaching search and the sabotage of the program by Lloyd Carr and his evil disciples. I've yet too see a single person, here or elsewhere, discuss Bacon's opinions on Coach Rod's failures. He did write about his missed 'turning points,' but no one cared about that. They wanted scandal, and Bacon obliged. Barely a word on the terrible defense. Not a single word about the staff mutiny against Schafer.

MGoBender

October 24th, 2014 at 8:48 PM ^

Is it scandal if it's true? 

I liked Three and Out for the inside view of the team.  The Lloyd stuff was in there and I don't deny it.  But I also know that Bacon wouldn't have included it if he didn't 100% trust his sources.  

As I recall, Three and Out did talk about some of RR's failures as well.  Specifically, Groban-gate and RR's continued inability to understand how to relate publicly.

Reader71

October 24th, 2014 at 10:13 PM ^

It's still a scandal piece. I'm not saying Bacon is a liar and I don't think the book was muckraking or anything. But it was scandalous, and that's why it sold so much. I think the book would have sold half the copies if the Rodriguez regime would have succeeded.

MGoBender

October 25th, 2014 at 9:12 AM ^

I re-read a few chapters of 3&out, and I'm okay with th idea that it is based on scandal.  I think the term "Scandal Piece" is a little pejorative since Bacon is reporting based on his personal presence in those meetings.  He's writing direct quotes.  Obviously. there's a slant to it.  However, there's reporting.  It's actually pretty unique when you think about it.

As for Bacon's bias.... The article the OP posts seems very objective to me - at least more objective than some of his blog posts.  It's main focus is that Prez Schlissel has a tough situation to deal with.  

Also, remember, we're reading all of Bacon's stuff.  This is rare.  Usually, a blogger will write a post - as Bacon did on Brandon and Concussion-gate - and then national sites will reach out and say "can you write a similar piece that includes more context for a broader audience."

So, it's not exactly a vendetta in which he keeps writing the same thing.  He's writing a similar topic, but for different audiences.  It's the Internet, so we happen to be able to read it all.

BoFan

October 25th, 2014 at 12:44 AM ^

Bacon is a writer but not a journalist. His last three articles were soley focused on bashing Brandon. Look them up. There was nothing balanced about the articles at all. If he were an ethical journalist, he would take himself out of the Brandon debate because of the perceived or real bias issue he has. There is a issue with journalism in general where the business model has changed and hidden agendas become more of a problem. And unfortunately with Bacon, based on his recent writing, he has damaged his brand. As a writer he has shown that he is more focused on making a buck. And selling books and clicks when optimized turns into muckraking and scandals. Brian has the same issue to deal with. The most uniques and hits at Mgoblog are during scandals and coaching changes. He makes more money when shit happens. Now in Brian's case I havent seen a bias toward reporting that would be muckraking. But for anyone in the business of writing, profit vs ethical reporting will become more and more challenging. Getting back to Bacon, he has the additional issue where Brandon excommunicated him from the program. And if you look at his recent articles, itrs quite clear his primary focus is to make Brandon pay for that. Three and out as others had noted was biased against Carr and not Rich Rod. As journalism that doesnt pass. As a story teller and writer, it makes for a better story. Note: I wrote this on a android phone so please excuse the lack of paragraph breaks and lack of grammar checking.

Badkitty

October 25th, 2014 at 2:47 PM ^

This is a false dichotomy that you're making.  Being a "writer" doesn't automatically make you "biased" and being a "journalist" doesn't automatically make you "balanced".  Do you think the Free Press' coverage of Stretchinggate was all that "balanced"?  Think guys like Rosenberg or Sharp are unbiased?   I'm guessing that most on this blog would answer no.  And newspapers and whatever other vehicle the "press" wants to use to disseminate the "news" always have to balance profit versus journalistic ethics.   A bankrupt newspaper can't publish to get the news out, can it?  So even if Bacon is trying to get pageclicks and readers, it doesn't mean he's not giving you an accurate picture of what is going on in the program.  

Ty Butterfield

October 25th, 2014 at 1:12 AM ^

I have resigned myself to the fact that DB is staying. I am glad I was able to get season tickets in 1995 and see Woodson play. I got to see a lot of great games with my Dad. It was a good run. I was certainly down on Lloyd but I should have appreciated the good times more. I don't see the football program doing well as long as DB is here. Could be a very long time before Michigan is good again.