JUST LEAVE ALREADY
AdverseVillain77
History
- Member for
- 2 years 27 weeks
Karma
- Current value
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | .... |
haha |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ... |
yeah legal theory seems vastly unpopular. should have known... |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ... |
well hopefully I can recover by the end of the year. I am getting smoked though thats for sure. |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ...haha |
my bad, now i feel stupid. |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ... |
i think a lot of us spend more time following michigan football than we would rather admit. AFter all, you are here posting things as well, albeit , in your defense, probably less than I have tonight. You sort of turn self-governance on its head, as it is expressed anyway in regards to free speech. No problem, is is somewhat of an opaque term. The self governance aspect of free speech goes towards the idea that we think it is a bad idea to suppress criticism by the minority of those who are in the majority. Therefore, self governance may not be one of the tenets of free speech that would be your strongest argument against me. I would probably agree with the notion however that there is a marketplace of ideas (discovering truth) and perhaps it is a viable conclusion that because most of the people posting here on mgoblog believe that the 3-3-5 is the best chance we have to succeed on defense this year, that it in actuality is the best chance we have of succeeding on defense, and therefore free speech has been satisfied in that we have discovered "the truth" that the 3-3-5 is the best defense. About the name, I mean, I'm not posting to intentionally make people angry, but I guess I could see why my explanation would make you think that. peace.
|
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | agreed |
I agree with you there. Part of the reason I thought going to a solid four man front would be to ease the effect that not having a David Harris on our team would have on our overall defense, as the reads for ezeh would get a lot easier if the potential gaps on running plays were reduced. If we had a kick ass linebacking corps, the 3-3-5 would probably be a more viable option. |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | There's more than 1 reason to |
David, literally man, I don't think that personal threatening a fellow fan is really in line with the spirit behind being a michgan fan. Sorry I made you that angry man. Go Blue. |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | 1) started an unnecessary |
I agree that starting unnecessary new threads is annoying and I don't like it when other people do this, and I apologize on that point BUT , In my defense what I am going to say though is that a topic or post that is critical of the 3-3-5, regardless of which thread it is brought up in, is always greeted with the reply that it should have been brought up in another thread and that it shouldn't be discussed because it has been discussed extensively already. Continuing on that line of reasoning, I thought that what we experienced yesterday during the MSU game brought new relevance to the discussion of the 3-3-5, because yesterday showed us the result of running this scheme against a team who can run the ball, and MSU is really the first good running team we have faced. Up until yesterday, it was arguably "unknown" how the 3-3-5 would fare against a strong running team. Given this fact, I made a new topic.
I don't recall or see anywhere in this thread where I was insulting unless someone insulted me first without a good critique of my argument however terrible it may or may not be. When someone insults me or just instructs everyone else to negbang me, my first response is to insult them because I'm thinking, that's just what OSU fans tend to do, not Michigan fans. So I insult them back, at least on mgoboard. If Lamaar Woodley insulted me, I would thank him and run away.
I don't see much Brah-speak in my posts, but then again, this is a site dedicated to football. To the extent that my screenname originates from common law property doctrine, I figure maybe this would absolve me of any dreaded brah-speak were I to have engaged in it but perhaps i that isn't enough I could also include a link in my signature to The Smiths Best II, which I own, for my own mgoenjoyment.
The general import of how I speak on blogs is not to attack people unless I feel like they are tryng to incite the collective community against me without providing any concrete reason of why I am wrong. If you look up and down this post, where people bring up relevant issues with my argument I respond to them in a cordial manner. If you bring up fact a, and fact b, and fact c, I don't respond by calling you an asshole. I respond with what I think may be a follow up to the argument or a comment on what they said. Where people just call me an idiot and they don't explain why they are the ones who are being inflammatory, I get pissed. Granted perhaps I should even concede that even these people deserve cordial responses if the topic Ihave raised is already unpopular, but this behaviour is something I have seen all over the place on this board. Anyway, thank you for at least not being one of the people who just calls me an idiot but brings some substance to your post. . Go blue! |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ... |
the plane comment was sarcastic but my original post isn't. |
| 1 year 32 weeks ago | ok.. still through |
I see what you are saying. But I guess the spirit of my post is saying is that if Campbell seriously isn't ready to play division 1 football at michigan yet, then stick whoever the next true defensive tackle is into the game next to martin with two true strongside defensive ends next to them in situations where you need to control the line of scrimmage. Personally I think the number 2 defensive tackle is campbell, but if it isn't, then whoever that would be (sagesse maybe). |
