With that type of weight differential and the frequency and matter in which they run the ball I could see it being a problem later in the game. It's really just physics...
What are everyone's thoughts on #10 going up against Wisco's big, nasty, OL?
I know #10 is listed at 222, but in all seriousness he looks way more in the 210 range and I'm just not sure how he'll hold up against an OL where everyone is 315+
He's a very active LB and has made plays all year, but hasn't played against an OL with this size across the board yet. I could see him getting worn down in the late 3rd and into the 4th quarter.
Recent Comments
Haven't played an OL like this yet this year.
Really thought there were parts in the PSU game this year where they were able to get hands on him and control him, and they are a very average OL.
Just think if they can get to him and use their size advantage that it will wear him down like nothing we've seen before.
** Will you be in attendance? Would love to meet up with some fellow posters beforehand **
With that type of weight differential and the frequency and matter in which they run the ball I could see it being a problem later in the game. It's really just physics...
What are everyone's thoughts on #10 going up against Wisco's big, nasty, OL?
I know #10 is listed at 222, but in all seriousness he looks way more in the 210 range and I'm just not sure how he'll hold up against an OL where everyone is 315+
He's a very active LB and has made plays all year, but hasn't played against an OL with this size across the board yet. I could see him getting worn down in the late 3rd and into the 4th quarter.
Just my opinion, your thoughts?