Sorta OT - Phrases, arguments, and memes that annoy

Submitted by ameed on
Standard boilerplate preface statement: I don't mean this to be inflammatory, just a laundry list of things that annoy me (and maybe you as well). A lot of these things have been beaten down and exposed for their stupidity already, and I will avoid true points of argument. The following things are annoying: 1) Snake Oil - I'm not sure people understand the phrase and context, and at this point I can't even tell when people are being serious or using it ironically 2) Those Who Stay will be Champions - This term means a lot to me and I am sure others, but obviously has been watered down to some pretty unintelligent usage 3) Michigan Man - See #2 4) "Terrell Pryor is a disappointment" - Maize and Blue blinders can be a good thing sometimes, but this argument is atrociously stupid. Don't let sour grapes ruin your perceptions on reality 5) "Brian, I dont like when you write about XYZ" - Free content people... yes, you have the right to complain since it is an open forum, but the rest of us have the right to call you a doofus. 6) People complaining about things (ha! get it? i understand the irony of how complaining about things that are annoying can in its self annoy others!) Feel Free to add to this list

KRK

February 20th, 2009 at 6:56 PM ^

The best use of that line is in a conversation with an actual asshat. You just simply ask them "Do you wear an ass for a hat?" The immediate reaction is priceless.

baorao

February 20th, 2009 at 10:50 AM ^

I can't stand cheap people. It makes me real mad when someone says something like, "Hey, when are you going to pay me that $100 you owe me?" or "Do you have that $50 you borrowed?" Man, quit being so cheap!

Brodie

February 20th, 2009 at 11:05 AM ^

I said "What about Breakfast at Tiffany's?" and she said "I think I remember that film... ah, yes, I recall I think we both kind of liked it" and I said "Well that's the one thing we've got"

Magnus

February 20th, 2009 at 11:31 AM ^

Comments like "You can't say anything negative about a high school recruit because he hasn't even played a down of college football." Okay, fine. You can't say anything positive about him, either, because he hasn't played a down of college football.

His Dudeness

February 20th, 2009 at 11:39 AM ^

People who post pictures in all of their threads. People who always rag on recruits who don't come to Michigan. People who feel entitled for doing nothing. People who weigh so heavily on sexual innuendos that they kreep into their comments and commentor names on a blog about sports.

jmblue

February 20th, 2009 at 11:56 AM ^

This is more of a nitpick than a full-fledged annoyance, but I cringe when I see people get "its" and "it's" mixed up. I'm amazed how often even college graduates get them wrong.

bronxblue

February 20th, 2009 at 12:44 PM ^

I hate when I can't find the droids I'm looking for. I also hate the whole "TWSWBC" and "Michigan Man" crap that people throw out as a way to crucify kids who don't come/stay at UM or for those people who never attended the university. Listen, I loved me time at UM, but I don't think I'm a better person because I'm a "Michigan Man." Every school has its proud alumni and asshats, and I don't think anyone should want to be defined by the actions and lives of unrelated people who happened to attend the same school as you.

Seth

February 20th, 2009 at 12:48 PM ^

Semicolon use is a rite of passage, a demonstration that the author's mastery of grammar has reached a point at which they [sic] feel comfortable exploring the next echelon of punctuation. Too often, however, I see people throwing out semicolons just for the sake of proving themselves a grade above the literary hoi polloi. A properly used semicolon can be a mark of prestige, a note to your readers that your writing is so evolved that your point must be given similar credence. But don't overdo it. Often, a period will do just fine. However, I am totally fine with use of the plural pronoun for a subject of ambiguous gender (see my use of "they" above). English isn't French; we're an evolving language. Maybe a hundred years ago, when gender roles were far more rigidly defined, there wasn't such a need to worry about excluding half the human population from a hypothetical phrase. But today, men and women are essentially interchangeable as potential subjects for the verbs of our endeavors (e.g. posting on a website). We need a tool for this, and the vernacular has already picked up the plural subject of "they" without causing any confusion. It is high time, I believe, to do away with "he or she" and be comfortable the natural evolution of language complimenting that of our society. Finally, e.g. and i.e. -- i.e. translates to id est, or "that is," but should be used as a replacement for "that is to say," or "in other words." It is not, as a friend once so seriously stated, "in example." If you want an example, use a "great example," or in Latin "exempli gratia," or "e.g." for short. Of course, if your meaning is conveyed, then I have no beef with you. The purpose of grammar is politeness. It shows you made the effort to word your statement by agreed-upon maxims so that your reader doesn't have to expend effort to understand you. You know what, on second thought, fuck politeness; fuck all you, e.g., i.e., he or she farted.

jwfsouthpaw

February 20th, 2009 at 1:04 PM ^

For me, the most annoying posts are the "well, nothing you can say will make an impact anyway, so why bother posting it?" or "why speculate? We just have to wait and see how it plays out" or "just wait a few days, and we'll find out if he commits then." Posts of this ilk epically FAIL to recognize that this Blog is dedicated to fanatical Michigan fans who enjoy talking about anything relevant to Michigan. And yes, that includes speculation of all sorts, especially which QB will seize the starting position, which recruits will commit, etc. etc.

Anonymosity

February 20th, 2009 at 1:15 PM ^

Good list. $UCKEYES, tO$U, $UCKNUTS, U$C, etc. are incredibly obnoxious. When I see someone complaining about "tO$U," I assume he is 12 and I stop reading immediately. Also, "Barwisized" and any of its derivatives are starting to wear on me.

Tha Quiet Storm

February 20th, 2009 at 1:32 PM ^

I overheard an older dude (40's or so) in one of my classes started talking about how he hates RichRod because: 1. He ran off a starting QB and 3 starting OL 2. His little linemen got pushed around by Toledo. 3. He tried putting players in a system where they didn't fit. 4. "If I did that bad in my first year at a job, I'd be gone. He should be gone!" 5. "I coulda won 3 games last year and saved the university a whole lotta money." 6. "I wasn't impressed with what he did at West Virginia; what did he ever win?" 7. "If you think they're winning more than 3 games next year, you're smoking something." Having argued against this type of BS all fall and seeing all these tired arguments disproved over and over, I just sighed and tried to ignore him. I'm just too tired to even respond to these fools anymore.