OT: Online gambling article (in which Sparty is featured)

Submitted by blueheron on November 21st, 2022 at 7:17 AM

I saw this yesterday and thought it might of interest to some readers. (Trigger warning for those who'd need it: New York Times.) As far as I know, UM doesn't have any direct involvement with online gambling.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/20/business/caesars-sports-betting-universities-colleges.html

 

CFraser

November 21st, 2022 at 7:25 AM ^

Yikes. Idk about schools officially endorsing betting. Hard pass for me. They make plenty of money anyways; no need to dabble in what some would consider predatory practices. 

I'mTheStig

November 21st, 2022 at 9:47 AM ^

They make plenty of money anyway

Most athletic departments operate in the red.

COVID financial stressors also led a lot of schools to cut sports.

Many of those that lose money do so at taxpayer expense -- schools like Michigan that have a separate athletic fund not related to the University at all and reimburse the University for aid-in-kind are the exception not the rule.

So of course they're going to look at any revenue stream.

Team 101

November 21st, 2022 at 7:49 AM ^

This is the logical progression of when it becomes all about the money.  It's sad to see the educational institutions that we support with our tax dollars are teaching our kids to become gambling addicts.  Enough of them will suffer from the problem without being induced to start.

los barcos

November 21st, 2022 at 8:14 AM ^

Meh. Where’s the outrage with beer sponsorships? Or, hell, Dr Pepper even - which as a sugary drink is a leading cause of heart disease which is the #1 cause of death in the US.

Gambling is a vice - like every other vice we have in society it can either be abused or enjoyed. Just like there are plenty of people who drink recreationally without any issue, there are plenty of people who gamble the same way...

spare me the pearl clutching.

 

los barcos

November 21st, 2022 at 12:01 PM ^

Meh. I’ll take the negs  here because there’s a lot of prudes apparently in this thread. Drinking is a major part of our society whether or not you personally like it and college kids definitely partake in drinking whether or not there are ads. if you’re going to argue that betting is so dangerous, then I can list many other items that you probably use that’s just as bad. Ie soft drinks above (remember when NYC tried to ban Big Gulps?). 
 

anyways the trouble with banning vice items is that something that might considered a vice to you is perfectly acceptable to someone else. sure I think we can draw a line somewhere - after all we did essentially ban cigarette advertisements - but plenty of people partake in betting responsibly just like there are plenty of people that partake in drinking responsibly.

BooKooBlue

November 21st, 2022 at 8:15 AM ^

Didn't we pass a law that banned credit card companies from recruiting college students to sign up. Universities encouraging students to sign up for betting apps seems just as bad.

Nickel

November 21st, 2022 at 8:43 AM ^

Two snippets I found interesting, the first part of promises that Gaming operators used to make the case for gambling in Michigan, and the second regarding whether or not high taxes on this kind of thing deter bettors.

... the American Gaming Association predicted that state legislators could expect to see more than $40 million a year in tax revenues. What has Michigan collected in the last year? Just $21 million in state and local taxes, according to the Michigan Gaming Control Board.

and

...New York has seen so much betting — even with a high tax rate of 51 percent — that the state has collected an extraordinary $546 million in taxes in the first 10 months of this year.

skatin@the_palace

November 21st, 2022 at 8:59 AM ^

I'm not an old guy yelling at a cloud, but I am here. Big picture wise, I believe that sports gambling is bad for society at large. The fury with which we all already follow Michigan football scaled out across P5 football and professional sports, that's just so much money we're dumping away for "entertainment" and what not. Sports at this high levels are already being subsidized so much by policy and our support, finding another effective way to pull funds out of people's pockets is bad form to me. I understand people have to make their own choices, can dig that, but the adds for sports gambling have exceeded critical mass. Every bus and bus stop, every single sports podcast, countless commercials on TV (streaming and classic), the radio. Now there are attempts at academic institutions to indoctrinate their students into the ecosystem? Not good, IMO. 

matty blue

November 21st, 2022 at 10:09 AM ^

+1000.

i put this in the same category as the "hey, people are going to smuggle booze into the stadium, we might as well sell beer and get a cut" conversation. 

legalization of gambling (or other 'vices') doesn't often lead to the actual fall of the sky that opponents sometimes cite.  however, in my opinion this stuff does lead to some coarsening of society, and tend to impact the less-privileged among us to a greater degree.  that, to me, is enough.

MGlobules

November 21st, 2022 at 9:04 AM ^

Without going hard politics on this one, I'd just like to note that there was a time, in my lifetime, when both left and right--and especially churches--were adamantly opposed. This story is really a piece of a still-larger story about what it has taken to buy cultural acceptance (maybe I should say buy-in).

Apart from the stories of families broken by this, the reach into particular communities, the idea that universities would play a role in getting our kids drawn in and potentially addicted--engrossed in something so far from their studies--is. . . painful.  

hailhail

November 21st, 2022 at 9:27 AM ^

Old man take (though I'm only 30 yo): I hope the whole college football (and basketball to an extent) system comes crashing down. It's out of control. Miss when even 'big time' college football was more or less the quality and spirit of Maction.

Bo Harbaugh

November 21st, 2022 at 9:37 AM ^

Speaking of bets and MSU

Never go all in on something with less than a 50% chance of winning just because it goes in your favor twice in a row.

Events are independent but will regress to their mean.

ie, Don’t lock into a 10 yr, $95mm bet when the known historical odds are worse than a coin flip, no matter how shiny recent outcomes appear.

Bohannon

November 21st, 2022 at 10:07 AM ^

I thought the NYT coverage of online gambling and college athletics was eye-opening, but I didn't find it surprising given how normalized it's become. 

The only UM connection I could draw was from the one game I attended this year, which was MSU. Barstool, which is mentioned in the piece as being connected to the issue, had a significant presence--and audience--adjacent to the stadium on game day. Perhaps this is the norm; I only make it to one game a year and this was the first time I noticed their ESPB Gameday analog (i.e. stage show). 

Needs

November 21st, 2022 at 10:44 AM ^

The follow on story in today's NYT (this appears to be a multi-day series about the new landscape of sports gambling) is about Barstool and how, in the old regulatory regime that oversaw sports gambling, association with Portnoy, because of his past bankruptcy for gambling debts and ongoing accusations of sexual assault, would have been enough for regulators to deny licenses. Today, not so much.

The grossest thing in the MSU story, for me, was the length that people in the AD's office went to hide their contracts and associations from public records requests. I don't love the gambling associations, but if they do exist at public institutions, then the public should be able to know the terms involved in the contract.

StephenRKass

November 21st, 2022 at 12:21 PM ^

Yeah, this is a hot button topic for me. I subscribe to the NYT, and saw the article yesterday. Pondered putting a link here, because of the MSU picture and connection, but decided against it. There are a lot of people here who are into gambling, and who am I to tell someone I don't know that they shouldn't gamble?

I want to reiterate that I'm not the morality police, and I have zero interest in telling students or alums what to do with their lives and what to do in their lives. But I am a preacher, and have seen what gambling can do. Had one member lose everything and commit suicide. Had another member, a retiree lose almost everything, to the point he and his wife had to sell their house and move into subsidized housing. It can be ugly. Very ugly.

Gambling, like many other things, is an addiction. Whether it is drinking, or gambling, or weed, or sex, or something else, most people are not controlled by addiction. I personally am not. But some are, and it can ruin their life. My adopted daughter, 21, is or was a heroin addict. I'm so thankful to God she is in a good place, and fighting the good fight, but addictions are ugly. She will struggle with this her entire life.

Thinking back to college days, it can be a challenging environment for an 18 year old with few or no restraints and guardrails. Whether it is beer or cocaine or sex or weed or gambling, it can quickly spiral out of control. I'm not completely naive:  these challenges have been around forever. My own fraternity on campus did really stupid things more than 100 years ago. This isn't new. But it seems to be ramping up more and more and more.

I detest the idea of everything being driven by money, and the idea of Universities entering into sordid partnerships just for the sake of more money. Of course, all of us need money to live, and money itself isn't evil. But when money and more money becomes the focus, it inevitably leads to things like partnerships with gambling companies. I suppose the next thing will be partnerships with pimps and brothels, to service the student body?

I really don't know the answer. But I don't want Michigan to add any advertising to the stadium. I don't want Budweiser tents inside the stadium and outside every gate. I don't want all the gambling sites to enter into partnerships with Michigan. I don't want weed dispensaries at the Big House, and a return to a blue haze covering the entire student section.

I just rewatched one of the corniest movies ever made, "It's a Wonderful Life." I'm a sucker for that movie, which is totally not how the world works. Still, think about "old man Potter." In the alternative picture of reality, Bedford Falls becomes Pottersville, and Main Street is covered with neon advertising bars and strip clubs and gambling. The reality is that Potter is the only one really getting wealthy. If you are a fan of the movie, you'll remember that Potter offers to hire Jimmy Stewart, a very attractive proposition to a young poor man. Stewart is tantalized by the prospect, but thinks about what it means, and angrily leaves Potter's office. I truly hope that when the Board of Regents are offered attractive financial propositions by gambling interests, they also walk away.

TL;DR. I too am not a fan of any partnerships with gambling interests.