Michigan Basketball is back! Here's how we overachieve.

Submitted by Nick on

 

Defensive sets:  Ive heard we could return to a lot of 1-3-1 in part because Manny wasn't disciplined enough to play it last year.  This years teams has less talent but maybe more length so they could play it decently by staying disciplined in their zone and knowing scouting reports (trap bad ball handlers, pinch zones towards shooters).  With the lack of a veteran shot creator on offense,  we will need to get fast break and secondary break ( trailing 3's in transition) opportunities.

Developing Skill sets:  It's no secret that many of Michigan's players are 1 dimensional offensively.  Can Stu and Novak develop any sort of in between game?  Last year opponents closed out hard and chased M's shooters off the 3pt line with impunity b/c they knew guys besides Manny couldn't finish off the dribble. Novak, in particular, was hesitant when he got into the teeth of the D and often just passed the ball out to a covered guy.  These two aren't athletic/big enough to finish inside off shot-fake attacks so any sort of pull-up J/floater game would go a LONG way to increasing our offensive efficiency.

Toughness:  I want Stu and Novak, when they get the chance, to throw their bodies into guys inside, shielding the ball and avoiding the shot block.  Finishing in traffic without trying to draw contact in unwise given their limitations, but they can improve their ability to draw fouls.

Shooting: This one is obvious.  The team will go nowhere without 33-35%+ 3 point shooting.  Confidence seemed to be an issue last year and it became a team-wide psychological thing.  Without Manny drawing defensive attention, 3-point looks will be less open and we will need to be able to convert with a hand in the face.  Bob Knight always said that 'good shooting is the great eqaulizer and erases a lot of mistakes'.

Tim Hardaway/Darius Morris:  Can they replicate some of what we lose with Harris.  This team will struggle to generate looks late in the shot clock.  Hopefully their jumpers are to the point that teams won't sag off them.  I'm more worried about Morris in this regard.  Last year teams left him wide open and clogged the paint ala how teams play Rondo in the pros.  If Darius can keep them honest, his penetrating abilities become increasingly valuable.  Darius' elite court vision is largely wasted in the half court with no passing lanes.

Rebounding:  When going to zone, whether it be 2-3 or 1-3-1 our guys need to do a better job of turning and finding the closest man to block out.  Block out responsibilities get mixed up a lot in zone and our guys need the mindset that the defensive possession isn't over until the rebound is secured.

Motion offense:  We need to avoid the 'going through the motions' lackadaisical periods of offense.  This means quick ball reversals, attention to detail in setting screens and tight curl action from our wings to actually make use of the screens.  Beilein will put them in position to make plays depending on how soft the D is playing, but last year the team often ran the sets slowly, passed up shots and deferred to Harris and Sims.  Minus those guys, execution is at a premium and our guys CANNOT pass up decent looks.  This team needs to play up tempo.  Beilein has stressed this in his quotes so far.

Breakout freshman:  College basketball is a sport where teams can improve instantly through recruiting.  If Smotrycz or more likely Hardaway flashes star potential this year it would be huge for recruiting in the future and for this years team.  A dynamic presence (even a young one) on offense can get us out of a stagnant sets.  A good NIT run and mid-pack Big Ten finish isn't out of the question with a Manny-like freshman year from Tim Hardaway Jr.  Without any instant impact guy, Michigan with likely do about what they're expected to.

Overall, the team is young, largely unphysical, but has some talent.  There will be frustrating turnovers and nights wheres balls don't bounce our way (both rebounds and shots). Most of all though, effort needs to be 100%.  The team is young and some breakdwons can be tolerated, but not slackin' it out there.  Above are some of the issues with our team that i've seen and what we can do to fix them (admittedly easier said than done).

Search4Meaning

November 4th, 2010 at 10:07 PM ^

the 3-3-5! (sarcastic humor here)

This should be an excellent test for Bielein.  Little is expected of the team, and they will need to count on teamwork to score points.

I will see them about a half dozen times this year, and I look forward to it.  

goblue1327

November 4th, 2010 at 10:10 PM ^

Not sure how many B10 wins this team will get, but I feel like they are going to be a lot more fun to root for than they were last year. Stu and Novak should shoot better playing more of the 2 and the 3, rather than the 1 and the 4, respectively. 

swdude12

November 4th, 2010 at 10:14 PM ^

With all due respect, I dont see this team doing anything this year...

 

I said with all due respect so i can say whatever i want. Its in the geneva convention...Ricky Bobby

M-Wolverine

November 4th, 2010 at 10:28 PM ^

The season. But I like this post. Rather than the fairy dust and magical charms most people have as their only reason why next year/season will ROCK, you come up with some feasible methods, and explain how it may happen. Good, well-thought out post.

GOBLUE4EVR

November 5th, 2010 at 6:33 AM ^

with your rebounding point, that was one thing that pissed me off about zach gibson... as soon as a shot went up, he would stand still and wait to see what happened with shot instead of getting in position to rebound... they need to have at least 3 guys crashing the boards at all times, and since we have some size now it should be a littler easier to do that... one thing that you left out that will be huge plus if they can do it, is mid range shooting... this is something we have lacked for the past 2 seasons, sims was our only player that did it on a regular basis... everyone needs to prove that they can hit a 10-15 foot jumper when the 3 or a layup isn't there...

Kilgore Trout

November 5th, 2010 at 9:20 AM ^

Great point on the mid-range game.  If Douglass, Novack, and Vogrich can give a pump fake at the arc and get those crashing defenders to fly by them, they should be able to take two dribbles and pull up.  I think that's a lot more realistic expectation than throwning their bodies into someone trying to draw a foul.

ijohnb

November 5th, 2010 at 8:53 AM ^

It is good to see some basketball talk.  All very good points, but I will give you the bottom line with Michigan, this version more so that any that I can remember under JB, we hit 3s-we compete; we don't hit 3s-we don't compete.  This is such a perimeter based offense, even if teams are playing M to take away the 3, they need to take it when ever possible, and hit a decent percentage.  It is simply the only formula there is with this roster.