EURO 2020 Round of 16 Open Thread

Submitted by Hotel Putingrad on June 26th, 2021 at 12:06 PM

Denmark v. Wales, just started on ESPN.

Italy v. Austria this afternoon on ABC.

Most casual observers are presumably rooting for the Danes because of the Eriksen situation.

snarling wolverine

June 26th, 2021 at 12:24 PM ^

Amazing that Denmark is a former Euro champion (1992).  They beat Germany (then the reigning world champions) in that final.  That must have been one of the biggest upsets of all time.

Teeba

June 26th, 2021 at 1:27 PM ^

Pet peeve time. This ESPN announcer is really starting to bug me. He just completed a sequence where he said 6 players’ names, followed by a, “nicely done by Allen.” If I want to know who the players are, I’ll get a program. How about describing the action? Provide some insight, talk about strategy, tactics, whatever. Nope, it’s just, “Bale, Moore, Allen.”

mgoblue0970

June 26th, 2021 at 4:25 PM ^

Even is onside.

Replay clearly showed his trailing foot was even with the defender's calf.

Horrible overturn on replay.

egrfree2rhyme

June 26th, 2021 at 10:49 PM ^

It sounds like you haven't watched a lot of soccer the last few years.  I agree that pre-VAR, overlapping usually counted as "even" which was considered onside. Since VAR was instituted 3 years ago, it's always been offsides if any part of the body that can play the ball is ahead of the last part of the defender that can play the ball.

Just kind of surprised that anyone is surprised by this in 2021.

los barcos

June 26th, 2021 at 4:38 PM ^

Agreed. If VAR is going to be enforced that tightly then the rule needs to be changed - measuring offsides by a half of a fingernail is going to kill the game.  How many goals have been disallowed so far?  This should be a 1-0 game with Italy desperately needing to press which would make for much better soccer.

Terrible decision and I say that with zero rooting interest one way or the other. I would be absolutely livid as an Austrian fan.

snarling wolverine

June 26th, 2021 at 5:14 PM ^

I mention the upper body because with the lower body, you can have situations where the offensive guy is striding and the defensive guy is still.  With the upper body it’s more clear cut.
 

Regardless, the important thing is that the offensive player has gained an actual advantage from the distance and isn’t just an inch past.

Hab

June 26th, 2021 at 5:16 PM ^

Having played defense, I have no problem with a striding attacker and me standing still holding a line, like on a free kick.  That's part of the game.  But when an attacker has a toe slightly beyond the last defender's shoulder... that's rough.  

And it cost Austria the game.

egrfree2rhyme

June 26th, 2021 at 10:51 PM ^

Reading the comments above, it sounds like a lot of people literally think that call was incorrect.  Which is ludicrous.  And to the guy asking, he did gain an advantage because if he was six inches behind where he was, he may not have gotten to that ball and put it in.

Would it be a better rule if you anyone who was overlapped counted as onside? Sure, I'd like that since it's a slight change that would lead to more goals.

But I am shocked that anyone thinks that call was actually incorrect.

The people complaining sound like someone watching an NFL game and complaining that it was a complete pass because the receiver got one foot inbounds.

snarling wolverine

June 27th, 2021 at 1:34 PM ^

I understand that the call was correct by the book.  I’m not confused by the call.  I just don’t think this should be the rule, because it’s hard to argue that he gained an advantage on the defense being so marginally offside.  

Without VAR this kind of nitpickety call doesn’t get made, so that annoys me about VAR.  This just means fewer goals, when I enjoy watching goals scored.

(For the record I don’t like the NFL rule requiring two feet inbounds, either.  That eliminates too many good plays.)

egrfree2rhyme

June 26th, 2021 at 10:45 PM ^

Yeah, I'm surprised reading these comments.  I wasn't rooting for Italy, but the dude was obviously offsides. By only 6 inches or a foot, but still obviously offsides.  I like that there's finally a level of precision in what counts as offsides (and I wish they'd do the same thing handballs, but that's a discussion for another day).

Just curious, were any of you guys whining when Mexico's goal got disallowed for being 3 inches offsides in the Nation's League final? I sure wasn't.

It's funny that people complain so much about VAR, but would it really be better to have these games decided by clearly incorrect calls?  It's like VAR gets 4 out of 5 calls right and people want to get rid of it because 1 out of 5 calls is arguably wrong.  When it used to be 50/50 at best.

bacon1431

June 26th, 2021 at 7:17 PM ^

Second match was a great match. Austria looked very good in the second half, was worried they’d sneak out with the win. A couple great goals in that one.