Best and Worst: Preseason

Submitted by bronxblue on

So yeah, like Brett Favre or Shia LaBeouf, I’ve not yet retired from writing these columns  and will instead give the Best and Worst treatment to Michigan football for another year. As always, because someone new to the site will inevitably point this out, I am shamelessly ripping off the concept for this diary series from Brandan Stroud over at UpRoxx, though certainly not as funny or insightful.  Though I can promise that the wrestling references will be kept to a minimum.

 

Best:  TL;DR

Just to be up-front about this diary, it’s not going to be particularly heavy with position-by-position breakdowns or deep dives into Michigan’s or their opponents’ two-deeps.  You can find that lots of other places, and let’s be honest; most takes you’ll read about this team are all going to sound alike because, well, human eyes are pretty consistent.  Unlike the usual game columns, where I’m just barely trying to process the last game before Monday rolls around, this diary is going to be more holistically focused, on Michigan, on college football more generally, and even this particular site.  But conventions exist for a reason, and for season previews that means having a prediction on final record and, for shits and giggles, a couple of one-off proclamations that will likely only come back to bite me in the ass.

So here they are:

  • Michigan will win 10 games this year, based on the team right now.  But since nothing is static over the season, the range of records I can reasonably conceive is a floor of 9 and a ceiling of winning a single playoff game.
  • They’ll beat MSU and ND.
  • It’ll be toss-ups against Wisconsin and PSU.
  • They’ll probably lose to OSU (unless OSU shocks the world and boots Meyer, at which point that game becomes a toss-up – UPDATE:  They didn’t boot him), likely in an infuriating close game.
  • They’ll wind up a couple of plays away from making the playoffs.  It’ll likely include at least one heart-breaker to some mediocre Big 10 West team who will treat their game as the Super Bowl and play out of their minds.  My money is on Northwestern, with the dark horse being Nebraska literally running the exact same plays, in the exact same order, as UCF did in Frost’s first year.  Either way, it’s going to be annoying.

Gambling and analytics say that 9 is more likely than 10, but that feels about right.  If that sounds like 2016 all over again, well, life is meaningless and eat at Arby's.

Best:  Running Before You Walk

When I started this diary series 7-odd years ago, I was a married guy with no kids, a wealth of free time and money in which to consume popular culture, and a perhaps-unhealthy attachment to how college students performed at sports I wasn’t remotely good enough to play at your local youth league, let alone at the elite level.  Now, I’m still that same married guy but with a couple of kids, no money or free time who can tell you the plot of a half-dozen Netflix shows about animated horses but nothing about Game of Thrones, and (I hope) a more refined understanding of just how hard it must be to be a college athlete.  Every year, you’re expected to be better than the year before, to juggle more responsibilities both on and off the field while more times than not, grown men and women whose continued employment relies on you playing a sport flail about your periphery and, well, act like human beings, warts and all.  All the while, due to some combination of pride, passion, and external pressures, you mature in this billion-dollar crucible, and in the end you hope to emerge stronger and smarter than when you showed up.

higdon-hs.jpg

 

jacked-higdon.png

And along the way, there will be stumbles, there will be bruises and bloody knees, cries of anguish when your ambition exceeds your ability.  One of the things I never realized with having a second child is that you’ll relive virtually every journey toward milestones you had with your first child again, but it’ll naturally feel a bit like a rerun.  Like watching Seinfeld or The Simpsons with someone experiencing it for the first time, the jokes are still great and the experience objectively fun, but the beats don’t hit quite as crisply because you know they’re coming.  Walking, talking, etc., all those hallmarks of maturation are novel for your kids, but since you’ve seen it before you’ll want to speed it up, to expect some mind-meld to have occurred between siblings so that they can skip all the mistakes, all the bumps and bruises, and just get to the good stuff.

But that’s not how life works.  You’ve gotta suffer through the rough times to enjoy the good ones, even if that simply means being able to put one foot in front of the other by yourself, because every misstep along the way teaches you what works and what doesn’t, what you can rely on and what needs to be discarded.

Jim Harbaugh took over a Michigan program in turmoil.  The last couple Carr years had been the slow deflation of expectations into Ferentzian statis, of settling in for a couple good wins and never fewer than 3 losses a year.  For a number of reasons you can totally read about in between squirting lemon juice directly into your eyeballs, Michigan rolled the dice with Rich Rodriguez, the outsider with the high-octane offense and, as it turned out, even more explosive temper.  He didn’t win enough and when he did it was either crazy fun or infuriating (based largely on what side of 67-65 catches your eye first).  In came Brady Hoke, a nice-enough man whose blood pact with the gods lasted exactly 1 year before the wheels fell off.  He left as he arrived, happy to be there yet woefully under-qualified for the job. 

Jim Harbaugh was supposed to be the savior, and despite some bumps those first two years he largely looked the part, delivering Michigan back-to-back 10-win seasons for the first time in a decade and putting them on the path to national prominence again.  Michigan was running with a head of steam, maybe a bit too fast given some structural deficiencies just below the surface (little offensive line depth, questionable recruiting at spots like QB, etc.), but all signs pointed to another reasonably smooth year in Michigan’s upward trajectory.

Then the season started, and Michigan wobbled their way through the early part of the slate.  They couldn’t pass block to save their lives, which meant their QBs kept getting hit, which slowed down the offense that really, REALLY needed to stay out of tough downs and distances, and the defense couldn’t quite cover for them.  They got nicked by an opportunistic MSU team, destroyed by a PSU team that appeared to unload their entire playbook on them, and as the season progressed the injuries kept on piling up, the blocking never got better, and Michigan’s season ended with a thud as they blew a double-digit lead against South Carolina. 

For the first time under Jim Harbaugh, Michigan didn’t look like a team on the rise, a team with unbridled potential.  They looked mortal, a team with inexperience and/or ineffectiveness at multiple spots and, for some reason, an inability to convince a number of top-rated players nationally to give them a look.  They stumbled and face-planted hard, and for a lot of fans those bruises haven’t quite healed.

But honestly, this is what we all should have expected.  Sometimes teams can just skate by on the downturn, the gaps between their best that all teams inevitably hit, but usually they don’t.  Michigan didn’t perform like a team that should be considered one of the best in the country, and in this conference that means you’re finishing 4th in your division.  It’s a hard truth, but that’s life.

And yet, this year brings new promise, and much of that comes from the lessons Michigan seems to learned from last year.  Gone are the multiple offensive line coaches, the Rube Goldberg-ian playcalls that required precision and timing Michigan never demonstrated, the search for an offensive identity.  Michigan grew up a ton last year and have the lumps to prove it, and even with one of the toughest schedules in the country, this feels like a year where we’ll see them back on track to being one of the best teams in the country.

Better(?):  Offensive Line

It’s not a stretch to say that Michigan’s (relative) struggles under Harbaugh are due to the, at best, inconsistent performance along the offensive line, in particular with respect to pass blocking.  Tim Drevno, as the de-facto offensive line coach (even though last year’s team-up with also-departed Greg Frey featured a confusing Tackles/Everyone else split), deserves the lion’s share of the blame for what sure looked like a confused unit last season.  Brian has often lamented that last year’s team didn’t meet a stunt it could pick up, and honestly there were times my absolutely neophyte eyes saw the flaws in the blocking scheme basically as soon as the ball was snapped, which says something a bit positive about me and a heaping pile of negative about how pieces of the line executed last season.  So both Frey and Drevno are gone and were replaced by Ed Warriner, one-time meh OSU offensive coordinator and all-time pretty good offensive line coach.  That tingling sensation you’re feeling right now is called “marginal excitement”, and it’s totally normal.

ezgif-5-0f4ca0d35b.gif

 

Now, I do want to point out that last year’s offensive line wasn’t necessarily the complete trainwreck it’s been characterized by some.  They did seem to figure out run blocking as the year progressed, mostly because they settled into the primarily power-based approach that had shown promise in 2016 and the guys you wanted to see get more comfortable (Bredeson, Ruiz, Onwenu to an extent) did.  By the end of the year, the line ranked 20th in the nation in adjusted line yards, which is a fancy way of saying that Michigan’s shiny top-15 rushing attack was the product of consistent blocking and not, say, having a transcendent talent toting the ball and bailing you out.  They never figured out how to keep their QBs upright, though, finishing 117th in adjusted sack rate last year, a near-100 position drop from 2016’s 28th-place finish.  And if that latter number doesn’t mesh with your memories of 2016, you are (a) not alone, and (b) realizing just how bad 2017 must have been at stopping people from angrily hitting Michigan QBs.

Early returns with Warinner point to a simplified collection of line calls while still maintaining the running fundamentals that this team seems to have figured out work for their personnel.  The line isn’t likely to be a 1-year turnaround considering we’re about a week away from the first game and there are still questions about who will start on both ends, but offensive line more than a lot of positions is one where you can technique/rep yourself into competence, and Warinner has a strong track record of turning globs of potential into, at the very least, solid starters. 

And really, that’s all Michigan probably needs to get out of their front 5 to be a coin-flip or better in virtually every game on their schedule.  Outside of OSU and maybe PSU if you squint a bit, there isn’t a terrifying defensive line that they’ll face in conference, and mobility at QB plus some movement away from the longer-developing passing plays we saw last year should further mitigate those concerns.  Yes, I’d love to live in a world where Michigan just mauled people for 4 quarters like Wisconsin does, but Michigan simply doesn’t have that talent on the offensive line right now.  So in the interim, give me “sustainable competence” and never look back.

 

Best:  QB Depth

When Shea Patterson, the ballyhooed Ole Miss transfer was finally granted free passage to Ann Arbor, most Michigan fans expected him to earn the starting QB spot from, amongst a cadre of options, incumbent/last-man-standing Brandon Peters.  Patterson was the #1 QB in the same class as Peters, put up some solid numbers as the starter for the Rebels last year before he was lost for the year, and by all accounts has been a quick study of Michigan’s now more up-tempo, RPO-infused offense.  I want to make it clear I am very excited by the prospect of a competent Michigan passing game, and I’d be lying if I said watching Patterson just flick balls 40+ yards down the field didn’t feel like manna from the heavens.

But I think a lot of people are comparing what Patterson did in a handful of games last year, on a different team with a totally different offensive philosophy, with last year’s, um, uninspiring passing attack and assuming he’d be demonstrably better in that same situation.

Wilton Speight entered last season the presumed starter and for good reason; he was coming off a pretty impressive first year as a starter in 2016, putting up solid numbers against good defenses and, at times, being the only semi-competent part of the offense (witness Michigan failing to break 100 yards rushing or 3 ypc in all three of their 2016 losses).  Still, John O’Korn had apparently given him some fight for the starting spot, and while his one start in 2016 had been downright ugly, it still felt like a bit of an outlier for a guy who had looked really solid at Houston.  And behind both of them was Brandon Peters, a top-100 recruit and top-6 QB nationally coming out of HS, the expected successor who was coming off a redshirt and one who had shown promise in the offseason.  At the very least, Michigan fans were reasonably confident that they had some depth at the QB position.

And yet, by the end of the year Michigan’s QBs had combined for 9 TDs (!), 10 INTs (!!), 54% completion percentage (!!!) and 6.4 ypa (!V).  The only schools to throw fewer TDs were a smattering of terrible teams (1-11 Rice, 2-10 Tulsa, 2-10 Georgia Southern), Army, and you guess it, count ’em 3 Big 10 teams (Rutgers, Illinois, and Minnesota).  Georgia Tech threw for more TDs, Florida threw for more. Hell, 1-11 Kansas nearly doubled up Michigan in the air, fergodsakes! 

And while I’ve seen a number of rationalizations about that performance, the one that I don’t buy is that all three of these QBs somehow forgot how to play football in 2017.  As far as I know, none of them were slipped Urban Meyer’s memory pills, and Jim Harbaugh had not one year earlier surprised everyone with a wholly competent Wilton Speight, so I doubt he’d lost his ability to develop QBs.  No, what happened was Michigan’s receivers got worse as a couple multi-year starters in Butt, Darboh, and Chesson wound up on NFL rosters and were replaced with players who simply didn’t produce at the same level (McDoom, Crawford, Perry compared to expectations) or were young and still developing into college receivers (basically everyone else), and that coupled with wonky playcalling and an historically bad pass-blocking outfit led to them running for their lives more often than not.  Now, that doesn’t absolve the position completely, as there absolutely were plays to be made that weren’t thrown well.

But Michigan was one of the youngest teams in the country last year, and this year they’re 37th, or about 100 places up.  The loss of Cole will be felt on the line and I think Speight is a better QB that people give him credit for, but otherwise the bulk of last year’s team is back along with a couple of exciting new additions, and it’s reasonable to expect that familiarity along with maturation is a recipe for improvements across the offense but most especially at quarterback.  And by all accounts the playcalling aspects have been streamlined, both in terms of who calls the plays (it’s Jim Harbaugh) and the number of voices heard from (basically McElwain and Hamilton to varying degrees).  So it’s safe to say Michigan should be better on offense simply because everyone got a little older and, you hope, a little more acclimated to playing football at the collegiate level.

Best:  Don’t Count Out Peters

I don’t really have a catchy title for this section or some great insights, but I’ve seen a number of people throw dirt on Peters’s chances at starting as long as Patterson is here, and I just don’t get where that’s coming from.  Shea Patterson is a very talented quarterback, and there’s a good chance that he’ll get much better coaching at the position than he got playing for Hugh Freeze at Ole Miss.  Furthermore, the extremely pass-dependent offense Freeze ran there (in the 6 full games Patterson played last year, Ole Miss only ran for more than 4 yards a carry once) will be markedly different than the one he’ll see at Michigan, which will ask far less of him.

On one hand, the top-line stats for Patterson at Ole Miss last year are a bit misleading; he put up great numbers against South Alabama and UT-Martin (918 yards, 76% completion, 9:1 TD:INT, 12 ypa) and perfectly adequate numbers against the P5 defenses he saw (1341 yards, 58% completion, 8:8 TD:INT, 7.4 ypa).  It’s an undeniable sad state of affairs for Michigan fans that those latter numbers are still demonstrably better than the combined totals for Michigan’s QBs last year (2226 yards, 53% completion, 9:10 TD:INT, 6.4 ypa), though “better than 2017” is less a bar to clear than a stick you try not to trip on.  The offense will be better simply because it couldn’t be much worse throwing the ball, but those latter numbers don’t portend the major uptick most are hoping for.

On the other hand, Patterson also faced a downright murderer’s row of pass defenses before he got hurt; Auburn (1), Alabama (5), Vandy (17), LSU (20), and even Cal (66) would be a gauntlet for any QB in any system, and Ole Miss’s offense last year put an immense amount of pressure on it’s QBs to Just Make Plays™ without the benefit of a competent run game or pass blocking.  While he’ll run into equally-tough pass defenses this year (OSU, MSU, PSU, ND, and Wisconsin were all top-40 pass defenses last year and should be reasonably similar this year), he should still find it easier sledding with a more complete offense around him.  And he should light it up against the mediocre-to-bad pass defenses on the schedule, something you might have deduced from the stats last year Michigan definitely did not.

But “Rich Man’s Tate Forcier” was the moniker bestowed on Patterson when he arrived on campus, and that seems to be a fitting comparison in recent Michigan lore.  He’s shifty, he’s got solid mechanics and a good arm, and plays like a guy who trusts implicitly his ability to get the ball where it needs to go.  When he’s right, it’s a thing of beauty; when he’s wrong, it’s…not.  And my guess is that that gunslinger mentality will lead to some rough games having him “play through it” might not be the best option, especially with a pretty good QB right behind him.

That bowl game against South Carolina did more to hurt the perception of Peters than really any other player last year, with the possible exception of Josh Metellus dropping that pick against OSU.  Here was a guy coming off a semi-serious concussion against Wisconsin, apparently getting cleared to join the team only a week or so before the game, who had a bad game against a good defense that shut down the running game and, toward the end, was rag-dolling his protection at times.  He didn’t play well, but before getting hurt against Wisconsin he had shown himself to be more than capable of leading the team and putting up decent numbers (don’t get me started about that 9/18 game against Maryland where apparently PIs were just turned off and Maryland was head-hunting pretty early on).  If Patterson struggles, I’d be fine with Peters getting some snaps and even a start, and not as an indictment on Patterson but simply an acknowledgement that Peters is a good option to run the team.

Worst:  Everyone is Terrible (But Also Good at Football – Except Maryland)

 

ezgif-5-17f2015f6b.gif

As a person with limited free time, I tried to write this diary in pieces, hacking away at it for 15-30 minutes a night every couple of days.  On the one hand that provides me with some time to really think about topics and craft a semi-coherent point, but at the same time it also allows the news cycle to chug along.  So to put this into perspective, I started this column a couple days after we all learned that DJ Durkin’s Maryland was pretty horrific, a place where killing a kid to prove a point about toughness was but the culmination of a string of personal abuses and attacks by men paid absurd about of money to “mold” teenagers into both football players and, per the brochure, human beings.  This was a couple of weeks after we learned Urban Meyer repeatedly made excuses for, covered up, and overall condoned a serial domestic abuser across multiple jobs on his staff because he’s the grandson of a guy who gave him a job.  That same week, we learned officially that Mark Dantonio welcomed back 18th-year senior Jon Reschke because he needed depth at lineback…er, because Reschke was sorry for calling a former teammate the N-word because said guy apparently hooked up with his girlfriend.  But it’s cool because a guy who got caught driving with a suspended license 7 times said it was cool, and anyway the second-highest paid coach in the state asked over 100 college students on his team if it was okay and they “unanimously” agreed. 

I long ago accepted the fact that college sports are just unpaid minor leagues for pro sports, a place for schools to make millions off the health and well-being of largely impressionable teenagers who love to play a sport and are good enough at it that they might have a chance to one day get paid money to do it professionally.  These athletes aren’t naïve by any means, but they are at a disadvantage in the great shell game run by the NCAA, and so are at the whims of the (always) rich, (usually) older, (usually) white men who run these sports.  And, as we’ve seen really for decades but seems to have come to a head in the past couple of years after the systemic sexual assaults cases we’ve seen at PSU, Baylor, and MSU, if you aren’t in that club nobody in power really cares about you. 

Nobody at Maryland seemed to really care that Jordan McNair wasn’t able to stand during his workout, with little to no medical treatment provided to him and what was described as a “ball of testosterone” screaming at two teammates to “[d]rag his ass across the field!”  They cared a bit more after he died, but it wasn’t until 2 months later, when reporters dug into the cesspool that is Maryland football, that people in power started to look into how a 19-year-old kid died practicing football at your goddamn school. 

Zach Smith had numerous run-ins with police spanning nearly a decade relating to his relationship with his ex-wife, including multiple physical assaults with children present and at least one time when Courtney Smith was pregnant.  He sent a dick pic while visiting the White House, ordered thousands of dollars of sex toys delivered to his office, photographed himself having sex with another member of the OSU staff, and lord knows what else while, and this is the weirdest part, being pretty terrible at his job.  And yet, he kept his job because his grandfather did his boss a solid, and that boss, Urban Meyer, is such an immoral, mentally incapacitated individual that he’d possibly break the law to keep him in the fold.  And even after receiving a punishment less severe than a bunch of UNC players got for selling shoes they received from their school for free, he wouldn’t even apologize to the victim of Smith’s violence until days later, after pointedly not doing so during his first press conference and (likely) only doing so after basically the entire world called him out on it.

MSU and PSU ignored decades of sexual abuses to occur under their watch, and nobody really cared because the victims were children and young adults, not even cogs in the great money-making machine.  Penn State was sorta punished, at least temporarily, and MSU had to pay out a lot of money but is still trying to white-wash their responsibilities and let a failed former Governor snipe away at the victims.   Mark Dantonio recruited a known sex offender onto his team, then almost regretfully had to boot him from the team when he attacked another victim. 

I’m listing all of these offenses not because I believe Michigan is morally superior to anyone; while I have my doubts that something systemic like Larry Nassar would occur at Michigan because that took a particularly unique combination of contempt for the health and well-being of others, I’m not foolish enough to believe that mishandling of sexual assaults or the health of athletes is a uniquely “not us” problem.  But thus far in Michigan’s history, they’ve largely steered clear of that, and the couple of times they did sway (mostly notably with Gibbons), they remedied it reasonably quickly and were publicly excoriated for it. 

And yet, this year Michigan will play all of these teams on the football field, and there’s a good chance they’ll lose to at least one of them (though not Maryland).  And it will suck if/when they do, because it’ll just be adding to the maddening crowd shouting down the victims of these offenses, the men and women who were hurt because somebody looked the other way or wanted to send a message.  This time next week, we might get a smattering of comments about Jordan McNair or Courtney Smith, but they’ll be in the context of how millionaires paid to run these student-athlete-composed teams handled these “distractions”.  It’s why I’m all for college athletes getting paid to play their sports and unionizing, to demand that the people making the money off their health look out for them a bit.  Because the NCAA is likely going to again clear $1B in revenue this year, and Jordan McNair, Courtney Smith, and untold others are going to suffer because of it.

Best:  The Defense Will Be Good and You Should Already Know That

It’s weird – I’ve probably spent a couple thousand words talking about the offensive line and the QB battle, and those two spots are probably the weakest/most unknown commodities on the team, and I’ll struggle to write more than a couple hundred words about last year’s top-10 defense that returns almost everybody and should only get better.  Like, here’s a highlight reel of them murdering teams last season, here’s Devin Bush destroying an innocent donut, here’s a glowing review of Rashan Gary as an NFL prospect, here’s a list of the top-20 players in the conference per PFF and a quarter of them being Michigan defenders, etc.  You get the point.

Don Brown turned a bunch of guys from cities you probably can’t pronounce properly without tearing out your tongue or smoking Marlboros since you were 2 into some of the best defenses in the country, so I’m inclined to believe that Michigan’s defense will be similarly stout this year and, one hopes, not worn down by the end of the year because the offense can’t stay on the field.  There’s definitely the talent there to be dominating, what with a couple of NFL draft picks on the line, another couple in the linebacking corps, and maybe the best secondary in the country behind them.  The 3rd- and 4th-string corners would be starters on at least half of the P5, they’ve got a 5* linebacker on the bench, and the defensive line could legitimately cycle through 8 guys without a significant drop in production.  In other words, the defense is a world-beater on paper and, one hopes, also on the field.  I’m sure I’ll have more to say as the season progresses, but it’s gotten to the point that I take it for granted Michigan will have a top-10/15 defense every year, and until further notice that’s the assumption I’m sticking to.

Worst:  The (need for a) Troll Hunter

One of the features I had hoped would have made the new site was the oft-mentioned “neg this poster into oblivion and then don’t let him post/make his posts invisible” button, as it would make it easier to not have to deal with the infestation of trolls, both real and concern, that show up every year around these parts.  And before you rush to the comments below to point out how YOU aren’t like that and how you are just telling the truth and not following the party line and blah blah blah, I’m not talking about you.  I mean, maybe I am, but probably not.  Because being negative isn’t a crime and it isn’t a sign of bad fandom; rarely are things as peachy as the parties would like it to appear, and there are absolutely real, structural concerns one can have about Michigan football as it relates to staff, recruiting, on-field success, whatever.  Hell, it wasn’t until Rich Rod was shown to be a horrible creep that I finally jumped off the “he could have worked at Michigan” bandwagon.  So I know all about holding unpopular opinions because that lizard part of your brain won’t completely shut off.

No, what I’m talking about is more malicious and, frankly, less authentic.  Without naming names because like Beetlejuice I worry they’ll return with the force of a strained fart, there is a contingent of the Michigan fanbase that exists seemingly only to complain about the current deficiencies of the recruits, players, coaches, etc.  It’s all absolutes written with the hyperbole key locked on, and it’s goal is to tear down someone or something because it isn’t meeting some subjective expectation in the moment.  It’s anger mixed with confusion and a sense of powerlessness, the reality that as a fan you basically have two options: accept and rationalize your team’s failings or stop following them.  But when you reject these two possibilities, you’re only recourse is the futile quest to have your voice heard above the din, and that inevitably leads to the lashing out you see online.

Now, if it sounds like I’m coming across as the Feelings Cop, here to dispense internet justice about how one should feel, I won’t fully disagree.  Everyone is entitled to his/her own expressions of emotions.  But that doesn’t mean you are above ridicule for them, and that’s where I’m coming from.  So when John O’Korn gets raked over the coals for pointing out that the vocal minority of asshole Michigan fans are both “vocal” and “assholes”, that says a lot more about the people with the pitchforks than the player.  Because the biggest complaint people seem to have is that he didn’t beat OSU, and then got tired of being the whipping boy for that segment of the internet we all sorta don’t want to recognize as existing.  Or when a player commits to Michigan and a decent number of the comments (plus a chunk of the actual post) buries him as a proxy for disappointment about certain aspects of recruiting, it’s not beyond the pale to point out that shitting on a guy when he pledges to your school might be in bad taste.  That doesn’t mean you can’t be critical or must put on your blinders, just remember that you are talking about human beings who didn’t do anything wrong beyond not be who you wanted them to be. 

And so while I absolutely want to see real discussions around here about the state of Michigan athletics, I’m not holding out hope that they will somehow survive the deluge of bullshit that constantly percolates just below the surface.

Quick Hits:

Here are a couple of smaller points that I’d like to cram in here:

  • Michigan should finally have a 1,000-yard back this year; Higdon was only 6 yards short last year and I don’t think they’ll set the first half of the year on fire with the type of ineffective runs they did in 2017.  That said, it’s imperative Higdon show more consistency running the ball (about 2/3 of this yards last year came against IU, Rutgers, and Minnesota), and I fully expect Chris Evans to emerge as a receiving threat out of the backfield to a degree we haven’t seen before.
  • Before his unfortunate injury I’d have picked Tarik Black to emerge as the top receiver this year; he seemed like a great fit for Patterson and is a matchup nightmare.  With him out, my guess is DPJ and Nico Collins will get the lion’s share of the balls outside, but Zach Gentry will probably end up leading the team in yards per target because it’s hard to see any LB or undersized safety being able to slow him down.
  • Depth inside on the defensive line is probably not going to be an issue early in the year; Notre Dame is the only team likely able to push Michigan around, and those big-time network games come with so many media timeouts and delays that even if ND went up-tempo at times they’d be hard-pressed to really run anyone down.  But the back half of the season features a bunch of not-fun teams that will absolutely tax guys like Solomon and Dwumfour.  This isn’t novel, but keeping people healthy will be essential for this defense to reach it’s peak.  The new rules regarding redshirts will hopefully help on this front, as it will mean guys can be cycled in during blowouts and less competitive games more freely.

Record

Looking at the schedule, Notre Dame is beginning to feel far more tractable as we keep hearing about issues throwing the ball and replacing a slew of performers on the line and in the backfield.  I said earlier I saw that as a win even before Brian Kelly brought chaos soccer balls into the fold, and nothing has changed that tune.  The next 5 games seems quite winnable, but I assume Nebraska or Northwestern trip Michigan up somehow.  So they’ll be 5-1 going into games against Wisconsin, @MSU, and home against PSU.  Go 2-1 here and take care of the carcasses of IU and Rutgers and Michigan is again heading into Columbus 9-2 with a chance to finally beat Buckeye Nation under Urban Meyer.  I want to believe, but right now I see that being any excruciatingly-close loss. 

The big variables for me are those three games against Wisconsin, MSU, and PSU.  Wisconsin seems like the most complete team of the group; playing them at home should help Michigan but I could see a repeat of the past couple years where both teams smash into each other for 3 quarters before someone breaks just enough.  I think MSU is the weakest of the group, as they rely immensely on Lewerke to keep that offense going and their point differential last year (+59 points) was somehow worse than Michigan’s (+83), and yet they won 2 more games.  To me, that smells of playing above your head, and a slight regression is in order.  PSU has recruited well and still has the best QB in the conference under center, but they lost a ton on offense and also saw Joe Moorhead, the architect of their elite offense these past two years, leave for Miss St.  I remember James Franklin’s PSU offenses before Moorhead arrived, and while I doubt he’ll be that bad it’s still an open question if they’ll be able to replicate that same level of performance.  If Michigan somehow sweeps this group, then all bets are off for the year.  But I’m pessimistic, and even if they manage to enter this stretch 6-0 it’s hard to see them emerging unscathed.

So there you have it; 9-3 regular season, a decent bowl game, and the possibility of great things with a few breaks.  And I’ll be honest, I’m leaning closer to 10-2 just because ND isn’t as scary and even now I’m struggling to worry about Northwestern.  Anyway, off to the races for 2018, and Go Blue!

Comments

901 P

August 29th, 2018 at 9:03 AM ^

Took me a couple of days, but I finally had a chance to read it today as well. Lots of good stuff about the season, but I especially liked this part: "just remember that you are talking about human beings who didn’t do anything wrong beyond not be who you wanted them to be." Those words should be included on the banner or whenever anyone wants to submit a comment. 

VintageBlue

August 27th, 2018 at 10:54 AM ^

If the fanbase could just Urban the way 2017 turned out, I think most projections for this year would be 11-1.  Here's to a season where the 'Worst' sections are few and the 'Best' are many!

 

Urban (verb):  To publicly forget something you definitely remember because ignoring it is much better for you personally. Also, pills or something.

MGoStrength

August 27th, 2018 at 11:04 AM ^

Michigan will win 10 games this year, based on the team right now.  But since nothing is static over the season, the range of records I can reasonably conceive is a floor of 9 and a ceiling of winning a single playoff game

Convention and experience tells me you are correct.

They’ll beat MSU and ND

Convention tells me you are correct, but football is rarely conventional.  The more I consider the MSU game the more I think it will be a difficult game with the defense they return and the fact that I think Lewerke & Scott will have much better years than last season.  I think they are both really good.  I think we find a way to win, but despite what should happen we find a way to lose to ND.

It’ll be toss-ups against Wisconsin and PSU

Agreed, convention tells me that since we get them at home we will probably win, but I think Wiscy presents some favorable matchups with their blitzing LBs against our o-line, their o-line to neutralize our d-line's pass rush.  I think the game comes down to how effectively can Wiscy run the ball and I think they upset us because well I have to say that to make it work out the way I want. :)

They’ll probably lose to OSU

Convention again compels me to agree with you, but at some point we have to surprise someone in this game and win and this seems like a good year to do so.  With so many close calls in recent years swinging the other way I think we are due.

They’ll wind up a couple of plays away from making the playoffs

I think we have an outside shot and may come up short, but I get the feeling you think those few plays will come against OSU and I think they will come elsewhere.

 

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say we beat OSU, but still go 10-2 and lose some other combination of 2 games from ND, MSU, PSU, & Wiscy.  My hope is we beat MSU, PSU, & OSU, but lose to ND & Wiscy.  If that happens I see a 4-way tie for the East Division between UM, PSU, MSU, & OSU which UM would hold the tie breaker on head-to-head wins and go the conference championship and get revenge against Wiscy and win the B1G.  UM would have a shot that could go either way about getting the last seed in the playoff.  We will finish the regular season at either #4, #5, or #6.

bronxblue

August 27th, 2018 at 11:56 AM ^

I will always underrate MSU because I find their coach loathsome and they have pulled out so many bullshit finishes in recent memory that I can't take them seriously.  They will be better offensively but my guess is they take a small step back defensively.  They'll be a tough win regardless, but considering Michigan is literally 3-4 plays away from being 3-0 against them under Harbaugh, that feels like a team that can be beat.

PSU is going to be a bear even though I think Franklin is a bit of a fraud as a tactician.

MGoStrength

August 27th, 2018 at 2:18 PM ^

Agree on MSU.  I think we get the W as well, but I think it will be a close game unless the God's decide to give one team a bunch of turnovers.

 

I think PSU is equally troublesome, but I like our edge on them at home with our defense, no more favorable matchups for them with Barkley on McCray and I think Brown will make adjustments, no more Moorhead, and Shea moving the ball a lot more consistently than JOK.

Blukon Cornelius

August 27th, 2018 at 5:08 PM ^

In your hoped for scenario, UM would be 8-1 in conference.  There would be no possibility of the other 3 of PSU, OSU and MSU all being 8-1 in conference in that scenario.  Conference record is the first thing taken into account in determining if there is a tie.

We would, however, still win the East division in your scenario.

 

MGoStrength

August 28th, 2018 at 2:00 PM ^

Correct, we would all be 10-2, but UM would only have one conference loss, where as MSU, OSU, & PSU's 2 losses would come in conference ideally.  UM would lose to ND & Wiscy.  MSU would lose to UM & PSU.  OSU would lose to UM and PSU.  And, PSU would lose to UM & either Iowa or Wiscy.  This of course means UM needs to beat PSU, MSU, & OSU.

Rutherford Foxtrot

August 27th, 2018 at 11:11 AM ^

Great piece, especially for anyone as busy as bronxblue that might still getting spun up on things for the season.

It seems like the general feeling this preseason can be summed up as cautious optimism. We're pretty certain we'll be better record-wise than last season, but not sure how much better. We're pretty sure that we have a quarterback, but we'll get back to you on that after ND.

Personally, I think 10-2 is more likely than 9-3, but perhaps just marginally.

bronxblue

August 27th, 2018 at 7:32 PM ^

Yeah, my guess is that said optimism hinges quite heavily on the outcome of the ND game.  Like last year, Michigan beat Florida and people were thinking this was a top-10 team.  If they beat ND and look competent doing so, I expect the ceiling to move from 9/10 wins to a division title.  

This still feels like a 9/10 win regular season; PSU is starting to feel a bit less daunting as they keep losing defenders, but OSU is sounding more daunting and Wisconsin feels like exactly the type of game where the Badgers unload everything on Michigan because, like last year, that's the first game they play against a team that could reasonably be considered "pretty good".

J.

August 27th, 2018 at 11:16 AM ^

I feel much better about the Notre Dame game now that I see the line has finally flipped to Notre Dame being favored by 1.  That's a full 3-point swing from where it was a month ago, and it really made me nervous: the last thing Michigan needed was to be going on the road, against a higher-ranked Notre Dame team, as a favorite.  Touchdown Jesus does not stand for such hubris.

trueblueintexas

August 27th, 2018 at 11:28 AM ^

Great read. Thank you for the time and effort it takes to write these. 

As with all new things and Mike Tyson, hope springs eternal before you get punched in the mouth. 

Last year, the Florida win was fun, but the Cincinnati and Air Force games quickly brought that excitement down even if they were wins. The rest of the year was an exercise of fearing when the wheels were going to fall off each game. 

This year I don't have that feeling. Michigan's either going to be good enough to win or not. It's not going to be because talent is close but not sufficient. It's not going to be because no one can figure out what the offense is trying to do. Sometimes you aren't the better team, and sometimes you aren't the better team that day. That's Michigan. That's sports. I can live with that. Can't wait for Saturday night!

MadMatt

August 27th, 2018 at 11:31 AM ^

So, piggybacking off of your excellent format and content:

Best: BronxBlue.  Your columns are easily the best Diary Entries, and from my point of view, they compare well with the content on the main page.  They are one of two or three columns I eagerly anticipate after every game.  You feel that you're using a "ripped off concept" from two other columns that are funnier and more insightful.  I dunno, but let me tell you what you do better than anyone else.  Your sense of perspective after a game (good, bad or meh) is as good as it gets.  You cover all the parts that push our buttons as Michigan fans, but without getting anabolic about the good stuff, or catatonic about the bad stuff.  You appropriately remind us that we are criticising the play of young men/late teenagers who have subjected themselves to a level of public scrutiny most of us would have difficulty comprehending.  I feel better about being a Michigan fan after reading one of your columns, and I think the fact you are in the midst of being a father of a young family helps you keep your outstanding perspective.

Worst: a whole snoutful of off-season uncertainty.  We have every rational reason to think this team is going to be really good.  But, our recent past has been littered with almost inconceivably unlikely difficulties: the RichRod and Hoke eras, that ridiculous punt play at the end of Harbaugh's first MSU game, a PSU team we defenestrated in 2016 pulling out rabbit's foot after rabbit's foot on its way to a B1G championship, horrrendous QB play and terrible game planning from an head coach regarded as "the QB whisperer" and an offensive coaching staff know for its creativity, our best defensive player getting hurt before the Orange Bowl and then our arguably best offensive player getting hurt early in the first quarter, the continued travails with O-line play in a program previously known for developing NFL O-linemen, OSU never once catching a bad break against Harbaugh, the continued existence of Mark Dantonio as a head coach (shouldn't the term of his contract with Satan have run its course by now?)...  It leads to Michigan fans beinng irrationally optimistic and pessimistic, simultaneously.

Best: Notre Dame back on the schedule.

Worst: having to play on the road for all three of our biggest rivalry games, including a consecutive game at South Bend.

One self appointed loudmouth's predictions:

- Epic defense and good enough offense to reach the level of a middling (not vintage) Alabama team.

- A 10-2 record, with 1-2 losses from the games against ND, Wisc, MSU, PSU and OSU; 0-1 losses from the rest of the schedule.

- A trip to the B1G East Championship game because the one Division rival who beats us will lose a couple other conference games, and none of the Division rivals we beat will pull off a 2016 PSU run.  (In other words, regression to the mean solves the "stuck at 3rd best team in the Division" problem.)

JohnnyV123

August 27th, 2018 at 2:16 PM ^

Hot Take (guess?): We haven't had a quarterback as good as Shea Patterson at Michigan since Chad Henne.

He lacks Denard Robinson's elite running ability but can throw. He will be as good as Speight throwing the ball but can run. I'm thinking faster Jake Rudock.

Shea Patterson and an improved offensive line and an elite level defense even better than the unit last year?! Road travel games are overrated. Harder yes, but not insurmountable. Remember that monster schedule Michigan State had a few years ago and they survived and won the B1G? That's us this year.

This is a team with a schedule so hard that two losses if they are to the right teams could still qualify for the playoffs. People still don't get the CFP REALLY rewards tough schedules. With the right wins and even two losses Michigan will pass pretender teams with one loss. 

BlueChip27

August 28th, 2018 at 12:33 PM ^

Great write up......I have been saying for weeks that I think this team is going to suprise people. Not saying a natty or anything like that but it wouldn't be a shock if they made the CFP to me as much as it would some folks.

Eye of the Tiger

August 29th, 2018 at 9:29 AM ^

Maybe I just have PTSD from the past decade of football, but I'd put the floor somewhat lower than you, at 8 games barring injury problems and 7 games with the kind of luck we had last year.

...which isn't to say I *think* we will win 7-8 games during the regular season. I think we will win 9 games. Basically we will be a much better team with not much to show for it, thanks to our schedule. But I also don't think 10-2 is unimaginable by any stretch.  

viewfromalbany

August 30th, 2018 at 8:24 AM ^

As always, excellent thoughts and analysis.  Your comments regarding a minority of the fanbase are spot on.  Lastly, writing these with two young children is commendable.

fergusg

August 30th, 2018 at 9:47 AM ^

Superb read bronxblue!  Really enjoyed this.  And fantastic choice of gifs...sparingly but excellently used.  Looking forward to these through the season.

 

Go blue!

charblue.

August 30th, 2018 at 11:22 AM ^

I really enjoy reading your columns during the season.

And I concur with your position on the season and how instead of looking at a season's schedule and deciding what the outcome will be, you have to look in smaller picture window frames than through a singular large lens and making a judgment based on that.

So, I would agree that Michigan could wind up going anywhere from 9 and 3 to undefeated. Michigan like all teams will have issues, and ups and downs depending on injuries and other unforseen factors that always seem to play a role in how games and seasons are won and lost from a fan's perspective.

I like looking at the season as a matter of building momentum and overcoming hurdles that propel collective optimism forward. And optimism is always highest when you win your first game and do it beating a major opponent where the threat of losing compels even greater interest and intrigue, which is the case facing ND in South Bend.

Beat the Irish, and do it with certain authority, and this team should be on the road to an undefeated record in September with another interesting road match in Evanston to close out a 5-game month.

Get by Maryland the first week of October, and at 6-0, and an unscathed season hinges on winning two huge home matchups against Wisconsin and Penn State, and then beating MSU. These are all big focus games sandwiched by trap contests leading up to the huge finale where anything goes in terms of possibility.

I am feeling this team could finish with a kind of 2006 year albeit with a hopefully better endgame result in Columbus. In any case, if they build it like that, then that elusive fun win finish will come. And because that's what I want to happen, that is the way I expect it will end. If not, I'll still read your column to find out why it didn't, along with being slightly disappointed but not crazy upset -- unless, of course, they lose in South Bend. Then, all bets are off.

Bo Champ

August 31st, 2018 at 8:36 AM ^

Thanks for doing these, bronxblue.  I have to say they are the most entertaining and well thought pieces on the site.  (also thanks for limiting the wrestling)!