Brendan Brisson with the game-winner (James Coller)

Michigan Hockey Game #38: Michigan 2, Notre Dame 1 Comment Count

David March 12th, 2022 at 9:40 PM

CLICK HERE for Game Recap from Kristy McNeil and other pertinent information and HERE for current Pairwise Rankings.

 

FINAL CORSI NUMBERS (www.collegehockeynews.com)

 

Total Attempts

Even Strength

Power Play

Close (within 1)

Even Strength %

Notre Dame

37

37

0

30

31%

Michigan

90

84

6

62

69%

Forward Notes.

-Michigan responded to the Notre Dame waxing a couple of weeks ago by outskating, outworking, and outbattling the Irish. Starting early, the Wolverines were winning the board battles which was giving them better offensive zone chances than in late February. Michigan backchecked well and fundamentally moved the puck through the neutral zone. That is the exact formula for beating a very defensively sound team. Then, their speed and skill took over.

-Mel Pearson brought back the Hero Line...after a less than stellar performance the last time they faced the Irish. Tonight, they were the best line on the ice, tallying both Wolverine goals. Matty Beniers and Brendan Brisson worked a great rush to get Beniers a smooth open net goal. After a strong pinch and hold from Jacob Truscott, Beniers fed Brisson who drifted into the slot and beat Matt Galajda inside the far post. The shot was tipped, but the chance was legit. If Michigan can keep this line together, it probably puts their lineup in the best position giving the opponent very different lines to have to defend. 

-The Beecher and Freshmen line was also very solid. Johnny Beecher continues to be one of the best players on the team in the second half of the season. The line didn't score, but they created chances all night. 

-Matthew Galajda was great again for Notre Dame. It took him most of the season to officially win the job, but he's been as advertised. Tonight, he stole multiple probable goals from the Wolverines, keeping the Irish around and giving them a chance up until the end.

Defense Notes.

- Michigan's overall defense turned in quite a performance on Saturday night. Notre Dame usually forces you to match them defensively and the Wolverines stepped up to the challenge. Other than a 5-10 minute stretch in the middle of the second period, where the Irish were able to get into the House and get some dangerous chances on Erik Portillo, Michigan mostly shut ND down and kept them to the perimeter. Michigan limited Notre Dame to only four shots in both the first and third periods.    

-While all of Michigan's defensemen played very well and stayed very fundamentally sound, Ethan Edwards popped a little bit again, getting forward and creating a couple of dangerous chances. He had one strong take, then got back to stick-lift a guy at the blue line and throw the puck back deep into the zone. He looked very positionally sound in his own end and dealt with Notre Dame's physicality very well...something he didn't do as well a couple of weeks ago.

-Jacob Truscott and Keaton Pehrson both had strong defensive games, pairing with the superstars Luke Hughes and Owen Power respectively. Truscott made the initial play, pinching, holding, and winning the puck battle on the boards that lead to the Brisson winner. Pehrson also supported Power very well and even jumped into the offensive zone at times. This defensive crew looks super deep at the moment.

 

No Penalty Kill Tonight (James Coller)

SPECIAL TEAMS CHART

 

PP Opportunities

PP Corsi For

PP Shots/Minute

Notre Dame

N/A

N/A

N/A

Michigan

0/2

6

3/2.5

Power Play. Michigan got a 5x3 for just over 90 seconds late in the first period. They set up in the X Formation, passing back and forth below the goalline. They created several good looks that Matthew Galajda saved. Brendan Brisson got the best look from his dot and drew the crossbar. The one knock would be that Michigan only skated with four attackers when they were allowed five. Alex said it went on for about 20 seconds...which is not great, ha. 

Penalty Kill. I've been doing Breakdowns for Michigan Hockey for seven years, and I don't remember not having to write up a PK section. I also don't think this was a fluke. Michigan skated very clean and didn't really put themselves in bad spots forcing any takedowns. 

 

Kick Save and a Beauty (James Coller)

GOALTENDING CHART

 

Michigan Shots Faced (House)

Notre Dame Shots Faced (House)

First Period

4(2)

9(4)

Second Period

12(8)

12(3)

Third Period

4(3)

10(5)

Overtime

n/a

n/a

TOTAL

20(13)

31(12)

Notes. Erik Portillo had one of his best performances of the season. While Michigan's defense around him was very solid for about 50+ minutes, when he was called upon to make a save, Erik responded timely. He made a big save on a 2v1 and followed it up with a huge kick save, getting to the post on a would-be open net. Notre Dame's goal off of a phenomenal pass from Adam Karashik, hitting Jack Adams right on the tape for a perfect redirect under the bar. That would be a tip of the cap. Strauss Mann was an awesome goalie for the Maize and Blue, but Erik Portillo has played as well as any goaltender in recent memory for the Wolverines.

Matty Beniers set up AND scored Michigan's transition goal (James Coller)

ODD MAN RUSH CHART

Defense

Rushes

Advs

Escape%

Offense

Rushes

Advs

Scoring%

1st Period

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

1

4v3

0%

2nd Period

1

2v1

100%

 

1

4v3

100%

3rd Period

1

2v1

100%

 

3

2v1, 3v1, 4v3

0%

OT

n/a

n/a

n/a

 

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total

2

2 x2v1

100%

 

5

2v1, 3v1, 4v3 x3

20%

Notes. Michigan gave up a couple of 2v1s on Saturday. Erik Portillo came up huge on the first one with a great save and cover. Luke Hughes broke up the second one after Jacob Truscott was beaten down the boards...basically his only blemish of the evening. Portillo was able to corral and cover that one, as well.

Unlike a couple of weeks ago, Michigan got a plethora of chances in transition. Beniers and Brisson worked a give and go for the opening goal, beating Notre Dame into the offensive zone. That was as pretty a goal as Michigan has scored all season. They also had a couple other great chances, but didn't get shots off on a couple, despite being in very dangerous spots on the ice. Brisson also was wiiiiiiide open down the slot on a 4v3, but the puck hopped his stick. Unfortunate.

FINAL THOUGHTS

This was arguably Michigan's best game of the year...at least of the second half. They eviscerated a very good defensive team and shut them down. While the scoreboard doesn't reflect it, they advanced metrics do. If not for a great performance from Galajda, this could have been a blowout. They also did not surrender a power play. It took one of the better passes I've see this year to beat Portillo. Michigan also played with energy and emotion and skated like they were the best team in the country. When Michigan turns in this sort of performance, I'm not sure if anyone is beating them.

Comments

stephenrjking

March 12th, 2022 at 10:01 PM ^

Excellent win. All big games from here on out. Absolute masterclass in the third period: they knew what they needed to do, and they did it.

That determination and effort, along with the brilliance of the talent, is exactly what they need to produce in the next three weekends of hockey. 

lhglrkwg

March 13th, 2022 at 9:21 AM ^

I was going to mention this clip till I scrolled and saw you already posted it. You can feel the relief and happiness amongst the guys finally slaying the dragon. Hopefully it's a galvanizing moment for this team as they're skating into the post-season. Not that we're some scrappy underdog that needs to stay hot, but that we can carry the momentum of this win deep into the tournament.

I agree with David- when Michigan plays like this, I don't think anyone in college hockey is beating them

stephenrjking

March 12th, 2022 at 11:34 PM ^

Minnesota wins, so it’s off to Minneapolis. Won’t be able to play in front of Yost one more time.

But a friend just included me in his ticket buy, so it looks like they will play in front of me.

Let’s go. Five more wins. 

mgeoffriau

March 13th, 2022 at 12:10 AM ^

One minor disagreement...I thought Pehrson several times just tossed the puck toward open space without real intent which led to ND players racing to beat the nearest UM player to the puck. Nothing much came of it, as far as I recall, but there were at least 2-3 "what are you doing" moments.

David

March 13th, 2022 at 12:18 AM ^

You could be right. I know there were a few of those, and I didn't catch who the culprit was. I thought he did a few good things, as well, including being available and "slowing down" Power, creating more fundamentally sound breakouts. I gave him some credit for Power having a better night.

bronxblue

March 13th, 2022 at 8:35 AM ^

Great win.  I missed the ND goal but it sounded like the pick got caught up in a ref's skates and that led to the puck staying in the zone.  So a bit of bad luck even on that one goal.

Anyway, on to Minnesota.  Feels like UM is playing really well and could pull the slight upset and get the tourney title.

Honker Burger

March 13th, 2022 at 11:58 AM ^

Michigan was going to send it around and clear the zone but it hit the ref in the corner and stayed in, definitely a bad break. But it was probably the only time in the game we got outworked as ND was able to cycle and win battles for a good 30+ seconds directly leading to their only goal.

That's going to happen over the course of a game, but overall this was one of the most physical, hard fought, complete games by the team this season, exactly what you need come tournament time. Still would've liked to see them get some low shots on net quicker and fight for rebounds as ND, per usual, blocked a ridiculous number of shots bc we often got caught waiting for the perfect opportunity (though this is exactly the type of game that ND forces and there is a reason they have been so successful under Jeff Jackson).

Older teams have won the championship recently for a reason, they typically have the physicality to win battles leading to ugly goals. Michigan is young though has as much talent as any team in college hockey, and if they play like they did yesterday, the ability to win the whole thing.

A2Photonut

March 13th, 2022 at 3:45 PM ^

I'm curious and hoping some of the wiser people here can fill me in, why are the quarterfinals best out of three, but the semifinals only one game? And I'm assuming the final is the same? How did that end up coming about ? Thanks in advance if anyone can enlighten me.

stephenrjking

March 13th, 2022 at 3:53 PM ^

In this case, the main reason is scheduling: it’s tough for some facilities to reserve their arenas for two three-game weekends. There are other events that happen at the same time, such as wrestling tournaments. This is particularly true for Wisconsin and Ohio State, though it wouldn’t surprise me if a Friday game would be a bit of a strain at Minnesota, too, during the high school hockey tournament.

In the larger picture, it has been common for conference first rounds to use a best-of-3 format for many years. In most cases the teams have then gone on to a single elimination neutral site tournament. That isn’t the case with the B1G, but the precedent means that this sort of schedule does not feel that “weird” from inside the sport. It is inside the Overton window, as it were. 

Sambojangles

March 13th, 2022 at 10:01 PM ^

Having it over two weekends is unusual, as AFAIK it's only the Big Ten and the new CCHA that do that. Everyone else had quarterfinals this past weekend and will do the semis and finals next Friday/Saturday. 

It's strange that a team like OSU, which lost in the quarterfinals the first weekend, would have two weekends off between their last series and the NCAA tournament, basically 2.5 weeks between games. Also, playing only a single game per weekend for two straight weeks feels odd in a sport that's based on playing back to back nights for the rest of the season. 

On the other hand, a neutral site semis/final would deprive the 1 seed of a home game that every other higher seed gets. It's an issue with the 7-team Big Ten. 

A compromise could be that quarters are held on campus as they are now, though delayed until a week later to align with the other conferences. Then have the top seed host the semis and finals (like 2021, though for different reasons). It would require OSU and Wisconsin (and maybe Minnesota, as you note) to have their ice arena available for a doubleheader on Friday and the final on Saturday, but they would at least have two weeks to prep and three games worth of ticket sales to make it worthwhile.