GoBLUinTX

May 6th, 2014 at 10:17 AM ^

Perhaps somebody else made mention that it is plausible that LeGrand was extended an invitation by somebody not authorized to grant the invitation.  

jnick7979

May 6th, 2014 at 11:21 AM ^

While I understand that it was rude to offer this young man an opportunity to give the commencement speech w/o being 100% certain they wanted him, I don't see the big deal in finding a more qualified speaker. The pres of the university decided to go in a different direction (for political reasons). So why is this thread worthy? All this blog wants to do is criticize, and spew negativity. It's time for some of us to look in the mirror, take a breath and chill the f*@k out.

WolvinLA2

May 6th, 2014 at 12:07 PM ^

I think a big part of it is that many people are pissed that Rutgers is in the Big Ten, so anything they do is under a microscope and gets blown up.  If most others schools would have done this, I bet there wouldn't be a thread, or at least the discussion would be less one-sided.  When people already have an opinion on something, everything that something does is viewed in accordance with that opinion.

Ex:  Tom Brady is awesome, so when he dresses weird it's awesome (because he's fucking Tom Brady, right?).  Rutgers sucks and I hate that they are in our league, so every borderline thing they do is fucking awful and Delaney is an asshole.  These are not necessarily my opinions but the general view around here.

bronxblue

May 6th, 2014 at 1:40 PM ^

It is thread worthy because it is yet another snafu by a team entering the B1G, and from a general college perspective just looks crappy given how much bad PR that school has had.  Yeah, maybe people are overreacting a bit, but I'd like to think so a prominent cock-up would be thread-worthy during the down period even if it wasn't Rutgers.

markusr2007

May 6th, 2014 at 11:54 AM ^

Jesus. They could have surfed the Eric LeGrand story for another decade or so and accrued tons of goodwill.  But no. 

First, call in the college football hero for a great honor, only to whisper to him softly after the invite to kindly leave.

Nice one Rutgahs.

 

Marley Nowell

May 6th, 2014 at 12:41 PM ^

Unfortunately this thread is not OT anymore. The whole speaker process has been a debacle with protests and such. Not to get political but Kean was governor of NJ before any of these graduates were even born. They would much rather hear a fellow student speak.

remdog

May 6th, 2014 at 2:46 PM ^

Has gotten out of hand at pretty much every university. I think it's best to have a non-political speaker or better yet, only a fellow student speaker. The spotlight should be on the students not the fame or infamy of the speaker. Besides, politicians typically aren't the best role models anyway. They haven't really achieved anything substantial except win a popularity contest. And political speakers tend to tarnish what should be a joyous moment by making controversial and/or offensive statements. At one commencement I attended, the speaker actually accused Bush of being a war criminal and implied that anybody who wasn't pro big government was a racist pig. Whether that's true or not, it's not the time or place.

Njia

May 6th, 2014 at 4:20 PM ^

It is too political, but if we didn't allow political leaders to speak, some of history's greatest moments would have been delivered in other venues. Among them:

  • Secretary of State George Marshall used Harvard's commencement in 1948 to outline his vision for the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe and hold off the advance of Communism.
  • In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson used Ohio University and the University of Michigan commencements to outline his vision for the Great Society.

I think student activism is a great thing (it flows from their idealism) but by chasing off a commencement speaker because they disagree with the views of the speaker, they may rob themselves of a history making opportunity. It's also rude.

SteveSlats

May 6th, 2014 at 7:56 PM ^

Facebook post by Eric LeGrand:

After speaking with President Barchi, I will be joining Governor Kean at the Rutgers' Commencement ceremony on May 18th . There was miscommunication and an honest mistake on their end. I have only love and respect for Rutgers University. They supported me from day 1. It is because of their support that I am able to graduate, as they made sure I had all the resources necessary to continue with school and work towards my degree. Let's keep the conversation focused on the graduates---the future leaders of tomorrow--on their accomplishments and hard work. I look forward to celebrating this occasion with my peers and let's hear it for the Class of 2014! 

socrking

May 7th, 2014 at 9:51 AM ^

Loiusville would have been such a better pick than Rutgers. Great bball and football teams. No professional teams to crowd the media time...oh, and their administration isn't in shambles.