An MGoBlog Rank 'um of teams

Submitted by Hail-Storm on

Pure Curiosity, how would you rank the following teams given only their Ave Points for, Ave Points against, and (Sagarin) Schedule Strength. Not very Scientific, but I was curious to see who people like based on just these parameters (if they like strength of schedule, defense, offense?). Note: scores include baby seals. (reveal of teams in thread)

Various Records
  Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 Team 4 Team 5 Team 6 Team 7 Team 8
Pts For 21.8 45.1 34.8 26.0 32.6 26.2 35.9 24.5
Pts Agst 12.4 16.0 14.6 15.0 23.1 17.2 22.5 17.9
Sched Agst 64th 86th 60th 25th 105th 52nd 38th 19th

 

king_kerridge

October 31st, 2011 at 10:57 AM ^

Team 1: MSU (fewest PA)

Team 2: Wisconsin (most PF, easy schedule)

Team 3: Michigan (just bc I know our PA is 14.6)

Team 4: PSU?? (just a guess beacause of their small win margin and played against Alabama which probably boosts their SOS)

Team 5: Nebraska (now im starting to struggle)

Team 6: Iowa (no idea)

Team 7: Northwestern

Team 8: Illinois??

MadMonkey

October 31st, 2011 at 10:58 AM ^

Here are my picks:

  1. Team 8 (strength of schedule with strong PF/PA ratio)
  2. Team 1
  3. Team 4
  4. Team 3
  5. Team 2
  6. Team 6
  7. Team 7
  8. Team 5

When do you do the big reveal?

 

 

Hail-Storm

October 31st, 2011 at 11:05 AM ^

in about 5 minutes (i'm not very patient). So far an interesting mix of results. They are all Big ten teams (not Indiana, Minny, and Northwestern). I see people struggling to rank the teams, which went along with my general hypthesis that November is going to be a crazy month in the B10 as eight teams are actually pretty similar.  

MichTits

October 31st, 2011 at 11:07 AM ^

Team 3 - ~20 PPG Differential against 60th ranked Schedule

Team 7 - ~13PPG Differential against 38th ranked Schedule

Team 4 - ~9 PPG Differential against 25th ranked Schedule

Team 2 - ~29PPG Differential against 86th ranked Schedule

Team 8 - ~7PPG Differential against 19th ranked Schedule

Team 6 - ~9PPG Differential against 52nd ranked Schedule

Team 1 - ~9PPG Differential against 64th ranked Schedule

Team 5 - ~9PPG Differential against 105th ranked Schedule

 

Hail-Storm

October 31st, 2011 at 2:36 PM ^

Team 3 - ~20 PPG Differential against 60th ranked Schedule 7-1

Team 7 - ~13PPG Differential against 38th ranked Schedule 7-1

Team 4 - ~9 PPG Differential against 25th ranked Schedule 6-2

Team 2 - ~29PPG Differential against 86th ranked Schedule 6-2

Team 8 - ~7PPG Differential against 19th ranked Schedule 5-3

Team 6 - ~9PPG Differential against 52nd ranked Schedule 6-3

Team 1 - ~9PPG Differential against 64th ranked Schedule 8-1

Team 5 - ~9PPG Differential against 105th ranked Schedule 5-3

This is part of the reason I didn't include results, because this would have scewed the results heavily. I question what Brian and Adam Rittenberg (ESPN) are seeing in Happy Valley that I'm not.

Hail-Storm

October 31st, 2011 at 1:14 PM ^

I decided to compare teams at all.  ESPN Blog had PSU higher in the Power Rankings than Michigan, so I just wanted to look at where they are statistically without wins/losses to see if I was missing why they were prefered. PSU looked very unimpressive. However, it is hard to distinguish between the top 7-8 at this point.

Trebor

October 31st, 2011 at 11:17 AM ^

Well, it's easy to figure out the teams based on the Sagarin ratings:

Penn State, Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, Ohio State.

 

But I'll play along anyway:

- A tough schedule goes a long way in my book. #4 and 8 have the best schedules, but #4 did slightly better against a fairly even schedule, so 4 > 8.
- Team 7 did well against their schedule, but not enough to overcome the somewhat easier slate. So 4 > 8 > 7.
- Teams 1, 3 and 6 are similar in schedule. 6 is slightly tougher than the others, but 3 vastly outperformed the others. So 3 > 6 > 1.
- Team 2 is obviously better than team 5. Team 2 did excellent against a easy schedule. Well enough to pass anyone in the previous group? I think so, as a 30 point margin of victory versus 9 is pretty big, even if the SOS difference is 20+.

So I'd say, in order, 4, 8, 7, 3, 2, 6, 1, 5.

(Which equates to MSU, OSU, NU, UM, UW, Illinois, PSU, Iowa - seeing the teams play so far, I don't necessarily agree, but it is what it is.)

Humen

October 31st, 2011 at 11:48 AM ^

Based on the absent statistic of W-L, team 8 could easily have three loses. It is tempting to assume that the point difference always resulted in victory, but this is unlikely. 

Team 2 or 3 seems to be the clear winner, but team 2's lack of schedule strength is really unimpressive. 

I would hedge my bets with team 3. 

3, 2, 4, 7, 8.

As far as head to head, I think statistically, none of these teams would be favored to win all of the head to head match ups, even if they are favored to win each individual game.