Our Running Backs- How to use 'em

Submitted by IBleedMaizeNBlue on

With the seeming lack of improvement in many aspects of our football team against Miami of Ohio, one positive did emerge; we learned which running back is best suited for which running plays.

McGuffie: Fared extremely well from the i-formation (mostly sweeps), and from short screens/swings. These are where he gained most of his yards (3 catches for 32 yards). A very impressive day for McGuffie (4.4 ypc) compared with his highly mediocre performance last week. McGuffie did not perform as well from our basic spread-option looks and running the ball up the middle. His size simply counts against him as he gets knocked down very quickly. A great open-field runner, not a between the tackles type it would seem. More i-form! More McGuffie!

Shaw: Both the touches Shaw had in this game were very impressive (2 carries for 45 yards). As opposed to McGuffie, Shaw is a much more effective runner from the zone-option read look. His speed and his shiftyness allows him to go inside-out for these type of larger gains. Why Rodriguez only used Shaw twice in these situations is beyond me. He was easily our most effective runner out of the zone-read look in the Miami of Ohio game. I want more Shaw.

Minor: Though used sparingly (1 carry, 15 yards, TD) in this game, Minor scored the only TD of the bunch. Though Minor is infamous for his fumble-itis from last year (and one this year, though the call was questionable), he is 30 pounds bigger than McGuffie or Shaw. When he's not giving the ball to the other team, he was effective in shedding tackles, using his size and speed to gain yards. We saw very little of Minor in this game, so it's tough to tell. But what I saw, I liked. I'd expect to see him used more between the tackles in upcoming games.

Grady: Again, saw very little of him. Aside from being perhaps Michigan's all-time greatest recruiting bust in combination his tendency two years ago to put the ball on the ground fairly consistently does not bode well for Grady. Not to mention a DUI for good measure to keep him out of game 1. Grady was effective in the short yardage situations in which we employed him. To be honest, I was expecting to see more out of Grady this year with maturation (oops!). I'd be interested to see if Rodriguez keeps him in this role for the rest of the season.

Moundros: I love this guy. He's the greatest: hard worker, tough blocker. He deserves all the carries he gets. Lloyd must be cringing knowing that fullbacks somewhere are carrying the ball.

I withhold comment on Brown til we can see him again.

That's my evaluation of the running backs in the Miami of Ohio game. Hopefully the coaching staff saw these tendencies too and we'll see a more balanced running attack that plays to each backs' strength than the seeming haphazard multi-back system we've got going now. 

 

Comments

ShockFX

September 8th, 2008 at 8:48 PM ^

"A very impressive day for McGuffie (4.4 ypc) compared with his highly mediocre performance last week."

The performance where lineman were blasted back into him before he even took the handoff?

"Moundros: I love this guy. He's the greatest: hard worker, tough blocker. He deserves all the carries he gets. Lloyd must be cringing knowing that fullbacks somewhere are carrying the ball."

Alternatively, if you actually wanted to win the game, you'd give carries to someone likely to actually gain yards with them.

"When he's not giving the ball to the other team..."

Why did you continue past this?

"Why Rodriguez only used Shaw twice in these situations is beyond me."

Checking injury reports is hard.

"That's my evaluation of the running backs in the Miami of Ohio game. Hopefully the coaching staff saw these tendencies too and we'll see a more balanced running attack that plays to each backs' strength than the seeming haphazard multi-back system we've got going now. "

I hope to God the coaching staff shares none of your opinions.

Go Blue Toledo

September 8th, 2008 at 8:54 PM ^

I generally agree with what you have to say... but i don't really think any of it matters because line sucks and is very inconsistent. I really want to see more of Minor though, he runs hard and seems to be just as fast as any of the other backs...fast, not quick.

Go Blue Toledo

September 8th, 2008 at 9:10 PM ^

I like how you just quote other ppl's statements and then rip them apart without really even supporting your side of the opinion, but some how it works. Keep doing what you do, you angry, disgruntled SOB

ShockFX

September 8th, 2008 at 9:23 PM ^

I find it more amusing than upsetting. If mouthbreathers made me angry I'd have been in counseling years ago.

Also --"Why Rodriguez only used Shaw twice in these situations is beyond me." Checking injury reports is hard. --

I don't think I have to support my "opinion" when the other person is blatantly wrong.

hat

September 8th, 2008 at 9:42 PM ^

Grady hasn't lived up to expectations, but he's not the biggest bust we've ever had. That's unfair. The guy at least contributes. We've had some blue-chippers never see the field at all.

Sommy

September 8th, 2008 at 10:54 PM ^

I think most people remember Grady as a "bust" because (a) he had fumblitis his freshman year (b) he's played behind Hart his entire career and (c) he didn't see the field last year due to an ACL injury.

He seems to fit the beer truck role nicely right now, even if he only touched the ball 2 or 3 times all game.

Huss

September 9th, 2008 at 3:01 AM ^

I'm sure RichRod and the gang are scrambling to copy your notes and look forward to implementing these RBs exactly how you've described - because, hey, we definitively know who they are now! new mgoblog rule: Leave the coaching to the coaches, stop thinking you know anything based on your dominance of NCAA 09.

Six Zero

September 9th, 2008 at 7:41 AM ^

It were this easy! PATIENCE, YOUNG JEDI! Rich is doing all he can with what he has-- if nothing else, The Prophet Brian has prepared us to expect less this year. No word on when, but the coaches WILL figure it out...

mjv

September 10th, 2008 at 12:31 AM ^

Without taking into account the blocking on each of these plays, it is almost worthless to evaluate the RBs on a limited number of runs. The reason being that the performance of the OL in front of them has been so inconsistent, and that is the single most important factor to an effective running game. While there may have been some success running McG out of the I-Formation, in general, the I is best suited to running between the tackles. Given our young OL and the preference for small, quick RBs that lack the ability to move the pile, formations that provide greater space for our RBs is likely to be a better fit.