Adv. Stats Schedule Rundown - Week 9 Results

Submitted by Ecky Pting on

Here's the Advanced Statistics Schedule Rundown for UM as of the end of Week 9, with the inclusion of Iowa as a 13th game should UM be so fortunate as to wiggle into it. The chances of Iowa making it to Indy in December are far greater than UM's, but as long as UM's chances are greater than zero, I'm showing it. I'll be looking into win expectations and B1G-wide outcomes in a separate diary, but I'll wait until after the Committee posts its rankings to get into that, since the CFPSC has a say in B1G results in certain tie-break scenarios, as I'm sure most of you are aware.

So without further adieu, here's the embiggable chart:

U-M Adv Stats Sched Rundown, 2015 wk. 9

Despite squeaking by Minny last week, U-M's position in the various ranks has held up quite well in the aggregate.  The defense is still the best in all the land in S&P+, and #2 in FEI, and surprisingly, the offense actually improved it's rankings in S&P+ and FEI.  Making efficient work of a short field still counts for something, but the damned Special Teams keep thwarting any opportunities for working long drives!

Speaking of which, Special Teams are the story of this season, and as Harbaugh mentioned in yesterday's presser, U-M's ST's are the best in the nation (openly acknowledging that the advanced stats are a thing). The cautious optimism associated with the Baxter hire last winter has evolved into a salty swagger. It would be the ultimate troll if say, once the game were well in hand, M punted on first down to Rutgers, and then buried them in the endzone for a safety, just because U-M could conceivably do that at will. Would that be considered impolite or running up the score? Comparing last year to this year, it's a more stunning difference than just night & day.  It's more like dark-side-of-the-Moon & sunny-side-of-Mercury. What's more is this hasn't been something that's been slowly progressing. This all started with that first punt against Utah, and Peppers first return. Then there was the Chesson KOR versus NWU ... what a thing of beauty to see those blocks and his route laid out there right in front of my eyes. It's the most remarkable thing of this team, IMHO, even more than the defense, which I admittedly take for granted as being a U-M birthright.

Anyway, getting back to the chart... Overall, U-M declined from #2 to #3 in S&P+, #7 to #10 in FEI, #2 to #4 in F/+, and #15 to #18 in FPI. Whereas U-M has held its own or shown marginal improvement in the unit ratings, what's more important are the relative ratings of U-M's remaining competition, particularly PSU and OSU, who have by-and-large improved by a much greater degree.  Although S&P+ still shows U-M as the favorite in all its remaining games, the margins have eroded (last week's chart can be viewed here). FPI shows U-M as a home dog versus OSU. Oh yea FWIW, U-M would still be favored over Iowa in the B1GCG.

Yours in football - Go Blue!


Please refer to the week 6 diary for additional external sources & references, as well as how to interpret the color scheme if it's not completely intuitive for you.

Comments

MadMatt

November 3rd, 2015 at 10:37 AM ^

Michigan has the best special teams in the country, and the #2 defense by advanced stats.  However, because our offense is a middling #58, we are underdogs at home to Ohio State?  I like advanced stats, but at times the conclusions it reaches are not always...internally consistent. FWIW, the eye test tells me our offense can neither run reliably, nor take the top off of a decent defense to loosen up the running lanes.  Even if the defense and special teams slow down the OSU offense considerably, I still don't see how the Wolverine offense can score more than a handful off points on the OSU defense (and mostly because the ST set them up already in FG range).  Let's face it, we need Jake Rudock to have a Devin Gardner moment against the Buckeyes, or a decisive win of the turnover battle, or more than one non-offensive TD.  (It would also be nice to see the targeting rule called the same way for both teams.)

kevin holt

November 3rd, 2015 at 10:47 AM ^

Well, going by the average, in FEI we're 10 and they're 8; S&P+ has us 3 and them 4. I guess I could see it being a coin flip from those averages, but the kicker (not that kind of kicker) is that our weak spot is very (relatively) weak, whereas all three of their phases are relatively equal. That weakness means we're the underdog even by advanced stats, I'd say (without authority on the matter)

CoachBP6

November 5th, 2015 at 6:24 AM ^

Why wouldn't we be underdog's to the defending national champs? We have no business being favored against a team on a ridiculously long win streak that has beaten us all but twice in the last decade. The Michigan arrogance befuddles me. Only at UM can you have 7 years of below average football and have fans that act like we're better than everyone just because. I wish Harbaugh would call the fans out for being some of the most fickle in the nation.

alum96

November 3rd, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^

I was surprised as well that the offense FEI went up as well but keep in mind it is not just what we did vs Minn but what all prior opponents did - they all get adjusted up and down each week. So if for example Oregon State pitched a shutout than UM's offense looks better as OSU's FEI defense would be higher ranked.Etc

Also Minn FEI D was decently ranked (in the 20s) so putting up a good amount of pts still helps even if two of the drives were 40 yds and 28 yds respectively.

It is also interesting to note that MSU hahs the best FEI offense we will have faced all year (OSU is basically a wash, OSU ranks higher in S&P+ and MSU in FEI).

I think the fear factor here is Gary Nova = Mitch Leidner and what that could mean for the remaining 4 games.  Laviano has been horrid without Carroo but are teams figuring out our safeties are an easy place to exploit thru the air?  Sudfeld + Howard are trouble - Indiana scored 26 on MSU despite only having the ball 21 minutes.  Can our O control the ball for 39 minutes?  Hack has way more ceiling then Leidner and Barrett is a dual threat stud.

Going to be a real test for our D in 3 of the last 4 IMO.