Are Defense & Spec. Teams becoming a Positive?

Submitted by StephenRKass on

There has been a lot of angst on the board over offensive play calling, whether Borges can adjust to the player personnel on hand, the spread vs. power & manball, protecting Denard, his passing skills and ability in the pocket, whether or not a "go-to" running back will emerge, whether the OL is creating lanes, etc., etc., etc.

I think these are legitimate concerns. But I also am reminded of something Hoke said in the pre-season, in so many words:  the offense is only 1/3 of the team. The defense and special teams also make a huge difference.

Even with our defensive liabilities, I see this side of the ball becoming a strength.

  • Mattison's ability to make adjustments to other teams and shut them down as the game goes on is huge. Against both ND & EMU, it looked bleak in the first quarter. But the defense adjusted, and gave our offense time to perform.
  • I haven't parsed the numbers, but I think our defense is way up over the last few years of Michigan teams in causing turnovers. Even with Denard's miscues, we still are way up on turnovers this year, a huge credit to the defense.
  • On the DL, the play of Martin has been great, Roh is finally healthy, VanBergen is solid, BWC shows glimpses of promise.
  • The secondary has been great, with Troy, Floyd, Avery, Kovacs, and Gordon bending yet not breaking, and stopping most of the home runs.
  • With the emergence of Hawthorne and Jake Ryan, alongside Demens, LB play has been solid. And Cam Gordon should be contributing anytime now.

Admittedly, there isn't enough depth. But if the defense stays healthy, I think they're going to be able to play with most of the teams we will face, and even win us a game or two.

Special Teams has been under the radar, but I am very, very encouraged.

  • Wile adds something to the mix, and has been solid, if unspectacular.
  • Hagerup will return in one more game, and will give us more range on punts.
  • Gibbons hasn't missed a field goal yet this year! Ok, this is overstating things, but at least this doesn't appear to be the huge liability of a year ago. Hoke sure doesn't seem concerned. Hitting a field goal last Saturday was a step in the right direction.
  • Gallon has done a great job in returns. It was beautiful seeing him return a punt a long way (only to have it called back by an illegal block to the back.)

With the return of Hagerup, we are going to see our opponents pinned deep more often, with a long field ahead of them. Sustaining a drive of more than 80 yards is not easy. If the defense continues to generate turnovers, this will be a great thing.

With the emergence of Gallon, and the ability of our defense to stop the opponent on 3rd and 4th down, we are going to see a short field for Michigan's offense more often this year.

Having a solid defense and good special teams play will make a huge difference in our overall play and record. Even with our offense stepping down a level, it is more than compensated for by our defense and special teams stepping up. As entertaining as it may have been, I don't want to see a repeat of last year's Illinois game, where our only chance of winning was being the last one to score a TD.

Comments

Nacho Mama

September 19th, 2011 at 11:34 AM ^

One thing that makes our special teams less of a high-wire act is our receviers ability to cleanly field the ball.  How many dropped balls did we have over the last 3 years?  We lost the 2008 Notre Dame game somewhat because of turnovers.  

Our kick coverage could stand to be better, yes it needs a lot of improvement.  But not turning our receiving kicks over is a start.  Also our tackling in special teams and defense is vastly improved.  How often did you see players miss tackles last year?  That hasn't really happened this year.  It's getting better all the time...

 

Section 1

September 19th, 2011 at 12:37 PM ^

Since Hoke and Mattison have taken over, I have noticed a significant improvement in the comments of Michigan fans with respect to tackling technique.  The numbers bear this out. 

Through three games of 2009, there were only 23 favorable comments about Michigan's tackling techniques.  And there were only 27 more favorable comments about Michigan's tackling techniques after the sixth game of the season, mostly related to Brandon Graham's tackling in the MSU game at E. Lansing.

Through three games of 2010, there were only 21 favorable comments about Michigan's tackling techniques, and only 19 more favorable comments through the rest of the season.

In 2011, there have been 137 favorable comments on Michigan's tackling techniques since the arrival of Greg Mattison.  Statistically speaking, this has been proven to be causally related to the number of favorable headlines in the Detroit Free Press, on a 16.57 to 1 ratio:

  • "Mark Snyder: Defensive adjustments make this Michigan Wolverines team different."
  • "Michigan defense gets high marks for turnovers."
  • "Mattison tackles issues on defense."
  • "Michigan defense rolling in right direction."
  • "Michigan defensive coordinator Greg Mattison installs rigorous regime."
  • "Simply mad about Mattison," and;
  • "DL:  Mattison's words like 'gold' to the team."

With everyone "simply mad" about Mattison, whose words are "like gold," the improvement in the attitudes of Michigan fans has been measurable and significant, well beyond ten standard deviations.

hfhmilkman

September 19th, 2011 at 3:28 PM ^

Now before I blow everyone's bubble up, I will say I believe Mattison is a far better coach then The GERG and I would rather go down giving up a big play blitzing then giving up a big play being passive.  In my opinion the defense looks inferior to last year so far.  This is why.  Last year when teams ran against UM they seemed to do okay.  A run oriented team like UCONN was blunted fairly decently.  As our team wore down and Mike Martin got hurt even the run defense was pretty horrible.  What scares the heck out of me is that even MAC teams can run on us.  UM should be so physically superior that our base defense should obliterate anything a MAC team can do.  It should not require an ingenious adjustment to counteract a MAC team.  Yet WMU and EMU gouged our defense going right at us. 

I am crossing my fingers and praying that we will see a big uptick because Campbell will magically get it and be a consistant force and/or Cameron Gordon comes back from injury and is way better then the musical chairs that has been WLB. 

If this is what UM is on defense, were going to get obliterated.  And if you believe this year or last year was not fun, what happens next year when Martin and RVB graduate?  Err, can you say true freshmen starting at tackle?  Lets pray Campbell gets it and ESPN was wrong.

There is a ray of light that if UM 2012 class is multipled by 3 and Mattison is still around, the defense will be very good as it appears we have some good defensive recruits coming in and no reason that Mattison can't keep briging them in. 

 

thesauce2424

September 20th, 2011 at 10:55 PM ^

I think it would be more accurate to say that the D and ST are inching away from being complete negatives. Which is to say that they are more positive than last year. I'd echo what was said by someone else: I'm ok with the D giving up yards, as long as we can keep the points down. And atleast we haven't been muffing punts or fumbling kickoffs.