Marvin or Latwan

Submitted by Zonereadstretch on
In reference to the recent freep.com article by Josh Helmholdt http://www.freep.com/article/20090401/SPORTS06/90401005/1054/SPORTS06/S… I pose (2) questions. How likely will it be that both Robinson and Anderson sign with UM being that their (2) of the top (10) safety prospects in the 2010 class; despite both knowing the depth and opportunity at the position? Also if you had your choice of only (1); who would it be? My two cents would be to gain the pledge of Robinson over Anderson, but hopefully we can sign both. Granted my numbers are based purely on those reported by the major recruiting services, but I was somewhat surprised to see Robinson ranked lower by Rivals than Anderson, especially in comparing their offer sheets. Please don't berate me on the unimportance of rankings as the senior campaigns and camps will have people moving up and down the board continually as I already know and agree. All in all I'd prefer to have Robinson's stature over Anderson's and despite Robinson being reportedly slower I still feel his game will lean more towards lowering the boom on those who reach his level in the defense, and battling against taller receivers in helping out J.T. and Boubacar in the future.

Tim

April 2nd, 2009 at 2:54 PM ^

They play different positions (Marvin is a Strong Safety, LaTwan is a Free Safety), and Michigan has a dire need for more good athletes in the defensive secondary. I'm not going to say which I'd rather have if given a choice, because that's a stupid concept; they're not mutually exclusive recruits.

TomVH

April 2nd, 2009 at 3:13 PM ^

We look good for both of them right now, and NEED both of them. The more bodies the better, but both are really good. We're in LaTwan's top 3, and everyone knows Marvin's situation. If I had to guess, I would say we get both of them.

Magnus

April 2nd, 2009 at 3:35 PM ^

Who said they're mutually exclusive? If I asked you if you'd rather have a Lamborghini or a Ferrari, would you say "I'm not going to pick, because there's no law stating I can only have one of them"? Anyway, I'd rather have Latwan Anderson. I think we have enough strong safety types and it's easier to find solid strong safeties than free safeties. Both are playmakers, but Anderson is a guy who can roam center field, make plays on the ball, and take it to the house. That's something we've lacked, but we've had pretty good strong safeties over the last decade or so. Anyway, Brandon Smith will still have three years of eligibility when Robinson/Anderson would get here, so that's another reason to choose Anderson first. It's a practical decision, too.

Magnus

April 2nd, 2009 at 4:52 PM ^

I agree. That doesn't mean we're always wrong, though. For this offense, I'd rather have Tony Drake than Jeremy Jackson. In my opinion, Jeremy Jackson isn't going to be an impact player at UM. Who knows? He could go to Texas and be a star but go to Michigan and sit on the bench for four years.

The Other Brian

April 2nd, 2009 at 4:57 PM ^

Tom, what have you heard about the alleged incident involving Anderson at St. Ed's? Rumors have been going around that that would be the final nail in the coffin that sends him off to Glenville. Heard anything on your end?

TomVH

April 2nd, 2009 at 5:36 PM ^

LaTwan said that he and his parents thought it was time for a change, so they are in the process of looking for a new school (He didn't want to get into why). I asked if the new school would be Glenville, or not. He said his parents are going to let him know his options tonight. Sounds like they are heading the hunt. I'll let you know more when I find out.

SonoAzzurro

April 7th, 2009 at 11:37 PM ^

why OSU hasn't offered Anderson? Are they not considering him, or will evaluate him and extend an offer in the coming months? Maybe they agree more with Scout's 3* evaluation?Without getting into the debate whether he deserves to be ranked as high as he has been by Rivals, it would sound like a no brainer to offer one guy that's a solid 4*, and from your own state. Plus, I get the feeling that Latwan is dying to get that OSU offer.

SonoAzzurro

April 7th, 2009 at 11:56 PM ^

It's just a hunch, not that I'm wishing so. Some of the Ohio guys that grew up loving M football have already committed, and there's others that have expressed a more determined interest. Considering his offer list, only if he grew up hating us would cause M not to be in the top 3 for now. Wanting to go to Glenville might be equivalent to a good recommendation letter for Tressel's application. We'll see how it plays out, maybe I've got the wrong impression so far.