Michigan Men's Tennis Update [Very Good]

Submitted by BlueDragon on

 

While Michigan fans paid at least some attention to the football spring game, B10 second-place Michigan men's tennis was in a dogfight with eighth-place Nebraska on April 14. Michigan won in a close 4-3 decision. Chart? Chart.

Team and Court Score
King/Bernstein 1 4—8
Franks/Buzzi 2 9—8(9)
Petrone/Zhu 3 8—4
Name and Court Set 1 Set 2 Set 3
Evan King 1 6—3 6—1  
Alex Petrone 2 5—7 3—6  
Michael Zhu 3 3—6 2—6  
Barrett Franks 4 6—1 6—1  
Alex Buzzi 5 7—6(4) 6—3  
Eli Brown 6 5—7 6—2 0—1(5)

Our newly promoted freshmen took some lumps on 2 and 3 court. Zhu on 3 was the first to fall, but Franks made up the difference with a commanding 6-1, 6-1 victory on 4 court. I love seeing Franks play these days, with his confidence and fine placement. King won on 1 and Buzzi won on 5, securing the dual-match victory. Unfortunately fabulous freshman Petrone lost on 2, and Brown dropped the super-tiebreaker set on 6 court. Brown has been dealing with the same issue throughout the season: his first serves do not get in! It cannot be overstated how important it is to get first serves in tennis; the psychological pressure is tenfold greater. Bernstein cannot return to the singles courts fast enough.

In doubles Nebraska pursued a fairly aggressive strategy, with hard serves down the middle of the court and lots of double net-rushes. King/Bernstein fell on 1 court but Franks/Buzzi and Petrone/Zhu held firm on 2 and 3 to secure the doubles point, which eventually clinched the match for Michigan. Nebraska stayed aggressive in singles play but did not have quite enough good shots to win against Michigan.

The match was a quick one, finished in only three hours. All singles matches were decided in straight sets except Brown's super-tiebreaker on 6 court.

On April 15 #22 Michigan welcomed last-place Iowa to the VTC and duly crushed the Hawkeyes. Chart? Chart.

Team and Court Score
King/Bernstein 1 7—8(2)
Franks/Buzzi 2 8—2
Petrone/Zhu 3 8—3
Name and Court Set 1 Set 2 Set 3
Evan King 1 6—2 6—2  
Alex Petrone 2 6—1 6—4  
Michael Zhu 3 6—3 6—7(7) 1—0(6)
Barrett Franks 4 6—4 4—6 0—1(5)
Alex Buzzi 5 6—2 6—2  
Eli Brown 6 6—4 6—3  

Probably the most interesting takeaway from this match was the second straight defeat for King/Bernstein in doubles. This was an interesting matchup. Michigan had already clinched the doubles point by winning handily on 2 and 3 courts. At that time the 1 court matchup was tied 7-7 with no breaks(!) to speak of in the match so far. The players agreed to go straight to the tiebreaker, which is usually played when the game is tied 8-8. Unfortunately Bernstein's goofy underhanded doubles serve was predictable, and Iowa's players figured out the pattern and pulled out the tiebreaker. The man at the net would poach and smash Bernstein's shots, or the return man would get a great return on his serve.

Only Franks lost in singles, in the third set super-tiebreaker. Even Brown managed to win his game in straight sets! This game tells us little about what we can expect for the rest of the regular season but I will attempt to predict what the next two matches hold for Michigan. The last time we saw them in action (April 15), Penn State lost 6-1 at home to the Fighting Illini. Thus, Michigan can comfortably expect to win when they play Penn State at home on the 20th. I predict a 6-1 victory with Brown or Zhu losing in singles.

Ohio...hoo boy. By shutting out Purdue 7-0 in West Lafayette on the 18th, #3 Ohio has clinched a share of the B10 title for the eighth consecutive season. All singles matches were won in straight sets, and Ohio won all of the doubles matches. The Bobcats currently sit at 10-0 in the B10, and Michigan is at 8-1. Only by winning their last two matches, including on the road in Columbus, could Michigan share the B10 regular season title. This is a tremendous opportunity for Michigan men's tennis; they have not been in a position to win the conference since at least the 1990s. I predict Michigan will put up a fight but fall 5-2. King will win, and possibly Buzzi.

Comments

John W.

April 20th, 2012 at 12:07 AM ^

Thanks for the post.

 

It has been a surprisingly good year for UM tennis in the Big Ten. Bernstein has been
hurt with 2-3 new guys playing matches. UM has no shot against OSU. I am predicting
6-1 but hopefully 5-2.

King has been great. Great victory at Illinois. His best victory of his UM career taking into
account the circumstances. It was sort of deceptive win since Illinois is not as strong since
losing Singh to Georgia.

Bernstein hasn't been healthy but it is nice to see Petrone stepping up. Hopefully King comes back next year (I think he will) and Petrone continues to get stronger. UM needs a
legitimate #2 player and Petrone does have the movement to compete at that level along
with the solid ground game.

Bernstein is a solid #3 but would be a great #4. Foot speed is an issue along with a mediocre slice backhand. Nice to see Zhu get a good win last time out but without question he is a huge key for UM going forward. He has the talent but needs to learn how to win and compete. If Zhu ever takes that next step then UM should be able to make the leap forward both in the Big Ten and nationally. I am not predicting over taking OSU but make UM a top 3 Big Ten program consistently with Illinois in the Big Ten.

I do like Franks. He is a solid #5. Another guy who can get better. Buzzi has been a real surprise for UM. Very good doubles player a tough guy to beat at the #6 spot.

Zhu and Bernstein. The keys to UM going forward.

 

John W.

BlueDragon

April 20th, 2012 at 1:20 AM ^

The match in Columbus will be played outdoors, which might help King and possibly Franks with their styles of play. But when Michigan plays five ranked players (6, 12, 67, 83, 101) on the other team, I have trouble seeing us coming up with three or four singles wins. Maybe we could shake up the singles order and sacrifice Franks or Zhu on 2 court and put Buzzi on 3, Petrone on 4, Franks or Zhu on 5. It's a tall order.

Jon06

April 20th, 2012 at 1:14 PM ^

do both teams have to commit to which player they're putting on which court without knowing what the other team is doing? or can you just sit there and wait until their players go to their courts and then send your guys out? can you switch up to match time? just curious.

John W.

April 20th, 2012 at 2:16 PM ^

lineup from what it has been consistently throughout the season. If you do..the program can be fined and the individual match ruled as a forfeit.

So lets look at UM. King has played consistently #1 so he can't all of a sudden play #2. If the #2 player had played #1 for 25% of the season and/or the #1 player had lost 3 straight matches then possibly it could happen especially if the #2 player has been winning.

I don't know all the particulars but suffice it to say you can't sandbag guys either in singles or doubles. Lets say Bernstein can't play then everyone below him moves up a spot.

So every team essentially knows who is playing who other than guys who can rotate between positions throughout the season. Brown or Buzzi for instance or having UM play Bernstein at the #4 spot but moving up Zhu which could be rationalized because Bernstein has been hurt recently.

John W.