Baseball: Pitch/Play Clock and Other Rule Changes

Submitted by formerlyanonymous on

The NCAA announced today that based upon the success of the pitch clock experiment at the SEC Tournament last year, they will be mandating the pitch clock be used league wide in an attempt to pick up the pace of games.

After allowing the use of a pitch and between innings clock experimentally last year, the committee voted to mandate the use of a timing device and implemented penalties for non-compliance. Current rules require pitchers to start their delivery in no more than 20 seconds without runners on base. This rule remains and an umpire will be required to monitor and enforce this time limit. Additionally, in non-televised games, umpires will enforce a 90 second limit between innings. The committee recommended a time limit for televised games of 108 seconds, which the Southeastern Conference used experimentally during the 2010 season. However, the committee acknowledged that the time between innings will continue to be a negotiable point in television agreements.

This isn't a huge game changer by any stretch. The rule for length between innings and between pitches has been part of baseball for several years. This new rule appears to only mandate a "play clock" like mechanism so the umpire can track the time without having to check his watch incessantly. There's enough other things for an umpire to watch closely other than his watch, and this makes it much easier for an umpire to enforce because the clock is in the open for all to see.

That said, this won't impact length of games more than 5-10 minutes for most teams. If anything, between innings will become a bit shorter, and that's it.

Obstruction While Making a Play

The NCAA had a vague obstruction rule regarding infielders making a play on a ball at a base while a runner was coming to the bag. For example, under the old set of rules, a batter grounds the ball to short stop. The short stop fields and throws an off line throw to first. The first baseman has to move up the line towards the batter-runnner. Before the first baseman can secure the ball, the runner and the first baseman hit each other with glancing blows. This would have lead to an obstruction call against the first baseman and the batter would be given first base, even if the first baseman was able to secure the ball, then tag him before reaching the bag.

Basically, you're punishing the first baseman for trying to make a play on the thrown ball way despite the fact that the runner could have gone around him in the running lane.

The committee also proposed a slight change to the obstruction rules, in an effort to provide fielders the ability to make a play on a thrown ball during a play at a base. Previously, any contact made between a fielder and runner could be called obstruction unless the fielder had possession of the ball. In the new proposal, a fielder that has established himself will be provided the opportunity to field the throw without penalty.

“This change is being made after careful consideration of our current rule and how this play was adjudicated previously,” said Overton. “The rules governing collisions and dangerous plays have not changed, but the committee believes the fielder must be allowed some room to make a play on a thrown ball.”

The rule change gives the fielder an opportunity to field a throw. This makes complete sense and should reduce unnecessary collisions as the runner has no incentive to go right through a fielder making a play.

Home Run Celebrations

The final rule change that should affect Division 1 is related to post-home run celebrations. The new rule limits the dugout from flooding home plate by restricting them to the warning track area, or 15 feet from the dug out. As an umpire, I'm a fan of this. This slightly speeds up the pace as you don't have to wait for the 25 guys on the team to clear the plate area and return to the dug out. The other major plus is not having 25 teammates that close to the opposing catcher, which is only asking for one of the young men to say something stupid and start a feud.

Comments

Blazefire

July 23rd, 2010 at 2:15 PM ^

Questions, though:

Regarding the pitch clock, and the fact that it is only in place when there are no runners on, I think that's a good idea, because you want to give the pitcher plenty of time to try for the pick-off or to get his signals straight. However, I wonder, what if the pitch clock could also be reset for attempted pick-offs. This would probably slow down the game, the opposite of the intended effect, as the sequence played itself out over and over. The runner and the pitcher could play an interesting game of chicken as to who would flinch first. Would the pitcher flinch at 19.5 seconds, giving the runner the half second head-start towards second, or would the runner flinch, presuming that with a half second to go, the pitcher was definitely going into his pitch, but he could be quick enough to turn it around for the pick off.

Regarding the HR celebrations, what about walk-off's? I assume since the game is over when the walk-off leaves the field, that the rule is no longer in effect and players can charge the plate?

formerlyanonymous

July 23rd, 2010 at 4:06 PM ^

The way it works in high school for walk offs is I can give a warning if they get too close. I normally keep the players outside the dirt circle. If I was umpiring a college game, I'd probably use the warning if they got past the dirt track, therefore getting around it. It's the end of the game, as long as I have a clear vision of him touching the plate before they swarm him (why I keep them off the dirt), I'm okay with them mobbing him right after he touches it.

As far as pitch clock goes, I think it's just when no one is on base. With runners, that would give an unfair advantage to stealing. The college game features a lot of pick offs both to keep the runners honest and to see if the batter will show bunt. If anything, instead of "resetting the pitch clock" like you suggest, perhaps a clock to get back on the rubber would be a better fix. That's tough too though because what if the pick off isn't clean and gets away from the first baseman - not enough for the runner to move up, but enough that it takes a few seconds to pick it up, check the runner, take a breath, then get it back to the pitcher. There's no need to rush that play any further. And if the pitcher is rushing to cover 1st after the overthrow, which is his responsibility, then he would be rushed a little bit.

formerlyanonymous

July 23rd, 2010 at 4:27 PM ^

So I was stewing on this all afternoon. Who runs the play clock? Does baseball have to get a 3rd, or in most cases, 4th umpire to sit in the booth and run the clock? Do you let the home team (who provides the official scorer) run the pitch clock? That seems sketchy, but isn't that how it's done in basketball and football?

Any one know how that's taken care of?

MGoBender

July 23rd, 2010 at 4:44 PM ^

Third base.  Have a watch the has a 20 sec timer on it that can be re-set with one button push.

Push the button when the pitcher gets the ball.

Push it when he starts his delivery.  It the clock beeps before then, award the ball.

I don't think it's something that requires a visible clock, but just require the ump to have an actual clock that they are truly keeping track of.

That'd be my quick, first thought on a solution.

MGoBender

July 23rd, 2010 at 4:40 PM ^

Ugh, I hate umpiring obstruction plays.  NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THEM!  It's not like interference where play is stopped and you immediately award bases.  That confuses the hell out of baserunners who are obstructed and immediately start bitching and pointing instead of running.

I guess this rule is an improvement.  You still have the gray area of when a fielder establishes himself to play the ball.  Does he need feet on the ground?  Does he need to come to some kind of stop?  These are crucial questions that I sure hope are specified when the rule is re-wrote.

formerlyanonymous

July 23rd, 2010 at 4:50 PM ^

I agree. One of the first things I was taught as an umpire was if it's that gray area, "I just saw a baseball play," or "I didn't see any obstruction" were the two answers they gave us. The first is too ambiguous and you couldn't pay me enough to say "I didn't see [insert anything here]" because that's just asking for a coach to think I'm not watching the play. I'm not sure the rule will ever be able to be worded properly. There's always that gray area and it's always too difficult to explain why one thing is but not another.