I mean, if we are going to be sneering at the idea of being affronted by inconsequential b/s we ought to be at least consistent; everyone knows narduzzi was making an off the cuff remark about football being tough sport by design and not actually advocating or teaching his players unnecessary roughness.
As far as far as actual cheap shots and personal fouls. Ugh think it's pretty apparent sparty gets penalized with more personal fouls on account of confirmation bias. Their opponents, especially in these rivalries, aren't actually playing so much cleaner, sparty just has the reputation and thus being scrutinized heavier. Hard truth, but true nonetheless. If U of M were actually playing like they wanted to win those apparent cheap shots would be surfacing on occasion as well.
" can't even get over his butthurt at what a 20 year old Mike Hart said 7 years ago.."
You know, this is where I kinda disagree with the majority of commentators here. Is it really 'What Mike Hart said 7 years ago" when we see the fan base, even the posters here, invoking Mike Hart's words constantly to this day? We say Sparty should get over it, but at the same time we don't see it leaving the lexicon of U of M-on-Sparty trash talk any time soon.
I don't know, I can't really tell that Dantonio is at being whiney or butthurt in his response to the stake thing. In all honestly, he was merely throwing out a pretty good zinger considering the results, and when pressed for clarification on his feelings about it all he said was U of M can posture and condescend all they want (which anyone with eyes can see that's what they were doing, no matter how trivial the display), but he and his team were going to stick to sending messages on the field.
Recent Comments
" can't even get over his butthurt at what a 20 year old Mike Hart said 7 years ago.."
You know, this is where I kinda disagree with the majority of commentators here. Is it really 'What Mike Hart said 7 years ago" when we see the fan base, even the posters here, invoking Mike Hart's words constantly to this day? We say Sparty should get over it, but at the same time we don't see it leaving the lexicon of U of M-on-Sparty trash talk any time soon.
I don't know, I can't really tell that Dantonio is at being whiney or butthurt in his response to the stake thing. In all honestly, he was merely throwing out a pretty good zinger considering the results, and when pressed for clarification on his feelings about it all he said was U of M can posture and condescend all they want (which anyone with eyes can see that's what they were doing, no matter how trivial the display), but he and his team were going to stick to sending messages on the field.