OT: Confederations Final

Submitted by TomW09 on
Well, here we go! Let's hope we get a solid game that comes down to a wire. Win or loss, if that happens I'll be relatively happy.

The Original Seth

June 28th, 2009 at 3:23 PM ^

Tim Howard is playing like he's possessed. How was that not a card when the play had been blown dead and homie took a shot on goal anyway? Is it a common thing in Brazil that people go by just one name? (three or four players on their team, plus their coach, have only one name)

mtzlblk

June 28th, 2009 at 3:53 PM ^

Holy shit. Could this happen? As per OP, at this point, even if we lose it is a great showing to even scare the Brasileros. Already happy. They had better start playing some D, B just banked one off the inside of the cross-bar and Howard got VERY lucky. That was a goal.

jg2112

June 28th, 2009 at 3:52 PM ^

....it would have taken 15 seconds to review Kaka's header to see whether it crossed the line, which it did. FIFA again, due to its insolence, has prejudicially affected one of its tournaments. A final, no less.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

June 28th, 2009 at 3:57 PM ^

I'm finally starting to get numb to these vuvuzelas. It's worse at the beginning of the game when everyone wants to get in on the act, but most of these people have blown their lungs out by now.

SpartanDan

June 28th, 2009 at 4:14 PM ^

And we've officially reverted to looking like the team that got smoked by Costa Rica and was damn lucky to scrape past El Salvador with a draw.

mtzlblk

June 28th, 2009 at 4:33 PM ^

Brazil playing like Brazil can...I didn't get to see the first half and I do know they are whiners, but then a lot of teams/players are. It is an unfortunate aspect of the game that the rules are applied as such...believe me I hear about that from U.S. soccer detractors all the time when they indicate soccer players are pussies. Brasil began pressing and creating chances like a top-tier team does and was able to exploit glaring weaknesses in the U.S. defense to score 2 goals in the final minutes. Perhaps better to say, Brasil is playing like Brasil can, and U.S. is playing like U.S. does.

mejunglechop

June 28th, 2009 at 4:49 PM ^

Brazil actually scored four goals though. It's time Fifa adopted some sort of replay system. Not to take anything away from the US, who had a great tournament, but Brazil demonstrated themselves today and in the group stage to be a vastly better team. I don't mean that to be inflammatory, but I think it's clear that the US national team is still at a place where it has to rely on luck (and/or absurd Tim Howard performances) to beat a top international squad.

mejunglechop

June 28th, 2009 at 6:12 PM ^

I think red cards, goals and penalty calls should be reviewable. You could give the teams a couple challenges a half. And as to camera angles, telebeam- the fancy thing they use to freeze a shot and simulate 3D has been around since the late 80s, but using that shouldn't be necessary. TV camera angles usually do a good enough job. But also, is there a reason there can't be goal line cameras?

Coach

June 28th, 2009 at 6:54 PM ^

You could use goal line cameras, but I think that on most of the calls where they're really needed, they'll be useless due to an obstructed view. As for review systems in general, I just don't like them. Challenges give coaches one more thing to butcher and reviews aren't always correct and they're rarely definitive. Just look at Bradley's red against Spain. The video was being used by people on this board to both justify and criticize the call. EDIT: When would you issue a challenge? The next stoppage? When you have possession? Could non-calls become send offs?

mejunglechop

June 28th, 2009 at 7:06 PM ^

The challenge could be issued either at the next stoppage or within something like 10 seconds of your team getting possession. And to your final question, I may be alone on this, but I think if a player gets injured and the ref doesn't see how it happened, the ref should have the option of reviewing the play and possibly sending the offending player off.

Seth9

June 28th, 2009 at 4:28 PM ^

I'd have been fine with a 3-2 loss that didn't involve going up 2-0 in the first half. Playing like complete crap in the second was not cool.