why WOULDN'T Hoke/Borges want to utlilize Denard's running ability? powerfootball-c

why WOULDN'T Hoke/Borges want to utlilize Denard's running ability? powerfootball-c

Submitted by griesecheeks on January 19th, 2011 at 11:08 PM

Hoke & Borges seem determined to install a more power-football-based philosophy at michigan. Let's think about this a bit: The thing that really surprised me about how RR deployed Denard last year was the straight-ahead, between-the-tackles nature of the playcalling, Watching that video of Denard highlights made me think that there's something unique Borges could work in terms of developing a scheme. It's not like Denard was some rogue athlete who runs around before letting plays develop. He's at his best when he can make a single move and accelerate into the secondary. The coaches have to have picked up on this if they've watched any footage of the past season.

So, as we move into spring practice territory, it really seems like it would make sense and not be too difficult to keep some elements of the QB lead-based offense. They've essentially got a great running back who happens to be able to throw for 2500+ yards. I really look forward to seeing how they build the offense this spring. 

What Does Great Offense Look Like and How Close is Michigan?

What Does Great Offense Look Like and How Close is Michigan?

Submitted by The Mathlete on June 7th, 2010 at 9:06 PM

[ed: bump.]

Pulling the content a little closer to home this week in an effort to keep a higher R squared value with the MGoBlog readers!

As always, this analysis only considers games between two D1 opponents and takes only plays during competitive game situations into account.

Not all great offenses are created equally

If we are going to know what it takes to become a great offense under Rich Rodriguez, we must first know what it will look like, because great offenses can take on many different appearances.  Below is a play success distribution for my top rated offense last year (Georgia Tech, option baby), the top passing offense (Captain Leach Texas Tech) and a look at West Virginia from 2007, Rodriguez’s last year at the helm.  I went ahead and threw in the BCS’s worst, Washington St, just for comparison.

image

The Paul Johnson option is working with big plays, rather they are taking out the bad plays.  Over three-quarters of Georgia Tech’s plays go for positive yardage.  This balances out no strong tendency towards big plays.  The end result is old school football: lots of long drives and moving the chains. 

At the Captain’s helm, Texas Tech had nearly a quarter of all of their plays go for no gain.  As always, there are tradeoffs.  For Tech they came in the form of the 10-20 yard gain.

Under Rodriguez, West Virginia saw something different than either of those two.  Even with a run-pass split close to Georgia Tech, the distribution of the spread 'n' shred was much different than the Option.  Where the Yellowjackets saw a heavy dose of positive but small gains, the Mountaineers had a solid lead in everything from 4-20 yards.  The end results where similar with both teams producing touchdown drives with regularity, but the path was much longer for Georgia Tech.  West Virginia’s ability to get the somewhat big play allowed them to shorten drives, add possessions to the game and eliminate some of the variance through an increase in scoring chances.

How close are we?

As everyone knows, we are much closer coming in to this year than we were last year.  Here is another chart to support that notion.

image There are many charts to look at that show the dreadfulness of 2008, so we won’t dwell on that.  What is becoming clear is that the shape of 2009 is becoming quite similar to West Virginia 2007.  The big difference, and its a big one, is that Michigan still has a lot of plays going for no gain, where West Virginia was able to get 5+ yards out of those same plays.

If Michigan is going to mirror the West Virginia offensive success, it appears to have a made very clear first step last season. 

How does this compare to previous years?

image The biggest difference between the Carr era and the Rodriguez era in terms of yardage gained distribution is the passing game bump from the Carr era in the 10-20 yard gain range.  The Rodriguez system is more geared towards to the 4-9 yard gains where the Carr offense excelled in the 0-3 and 10-20 yard ranges.

What does this mean for 2010?

The cliché: Take the Next Step. 

It looks like framework of what Rodriguez wants to do is in place after two rough years, but the execution is still behind his days at West Virginia.  The offensive line now has two years in the system and for the first time there is a quarterback (in fact two!) who have both experience and talent. As I noted in a previous diary, a jump from average in 2009 to good in 2010 is certainly a good possibility and with a break or two and improved quarterback play, it could go from average to great.

More Optimism - A Look at HS All-Americans

More Optimism - A Look at HS All-Americans

Submitted by BleedingBlue on November 23rd, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Coach Rod got some talented freshman great experience this year (aside from the obvious Tate and Denard on offense and Roh (UA AA) on defense) that will get unleashed at the beginning of the 2010 season including Vincent Smith, Roundtree, Omameh and Campbell (Army AA), and there should be even more talent to contribute in 2010 as the season unfolds like these kids did in 2009. The following guys were Under Armour or Amry All-Americans and redshirted this year (not sure on Stokes): 2009: Army AA JT Turner - CB Je'Ron Stokes - WR Anthony LoLata - DT Brendan Gibbons - PK Jeremy Gallon - Slot UA AA Taylor Lewan - OT Isiah Bell - LB/S Quinton Washington - OG That's some pretty stellar looking talent spread across the field waiting in the wings. -------------------- A look ahead: --------------------- 2010 Commits: UA AA Devin Gardner - QB Marvin Robinson - FS - Early Enrolee! Army AA Will Hagerup Possible: Dillon Baxter? Tony Jefferson? Dior Mathis? -------------------- A look back to see where our past AA's ended up or how they contributed: -------------------- 2001: Pierre Woods - Patriots Marlin Jackson - Colts -------------------- 2002: Mike Kolodjzei - backup O-Lineman? Jason Avant - Eagles ----------------------- 2003: Garret Rivas - awesome kicker/nickname "Pork Chop" also awesome Clayton Richard - MLB Pitcher Will Paul - backup DT? Ryan Mundy - Injured/transferred then drafted Leon Hall - Bengals Shawn Crable - Patriots? Anton Campbell - Transferred? Prescott Burgess - Ravens -------------------------------- 2004: Max Martin - transferred Tim Jamison - multi-year starter Chad Henne - Dolphins Doug Dutch - Special Teams contributor - never found position Jeremy Ciulla - left at coaching change? Alan Branch - Cardinals Adrian Arrington - Saints ----------------- 2005 - bad year except for Space Emporor of Course: Marquez Slocum - yeah...that whole Lion thing Zoltan Mesko - Best punter EVER James McKinney - ? -------------------------- 2006: Stephen Schilling - should dominate next year Jonas Mouton - hopefully can put it together for Sr. year Brandon Graham - best player on the team this year Steven Brown - best LB on the team Mr. Plow - argh ----------------------------- 2007: Mike Williams - still young, hopefully the light goes on here Donovan Warren - will be best the player on the Defense in 2010 ----------------------------- 2008: Brandon Smith - monster on Special Teams as a RS Frosh Sam McGuffie - bler Boubacar Cossoko - bler -------------------------------

That's a pretty good record of good play from All-American kids that didn't end up transferring/quitting or pulling a Benedict Arnold. An especially big haul (9 contributers)in 2003 and 2004 probably directly contributed to the stellar 2006 season.


I'm hoping all the 2009 talent (10 All-Americans) will emerge en force in the 2011 season and we will see an 11-0 spread 'n' shred edition of the Maize&Blue destroy the Buckeyes the next time they come to Ann Arbor...maybe on the way to a National Championship.