Brodie

July 28th, 2009 at 4:00 PM ^

Old news, but I'm not shocked by this. A lot of people were very pissed off by the Illinois invite and the BCS is trying desperately to improve.

Yinka Double Dare

July 28th, 2009 at 4:21 PM ^

It's a one shot deal over the four years though -- they have to do it the first time, but if it happens again they can go back to inviting another Big 10 or Pac 10 team that's BCS eligible if they want.

Wide Open

July 29th, 2009 at 11:03 AM ^

And yeah...I'm still ticked off by it, as I am any time it's not Big 10 vs. Pac 10. It's to the point where I hope Michigan goes undefeated, but we somehow end up #3 in the BCS to two one-loss SEC/Big 12 teams. (Which the way the Big Ten is ragged on isn't out of the realm of possibility.) Then at least a team like 2007 Hawaii, or a 1984 BYU for that matter, wouldn't go to Pasadena having beaten no one in the top 20.

Brodie

July 29th, 2009 at 2:14 PM ^

Utah, for example, beat two top 20 teams last year. BYU couldn't find any big teams to play them in 1984 because they were afraid. We were 6-5, otherwise not really being considered for a bowl, and we were the only team willing to lose to BYU in the Holiday Bowl.

Wide Open

July 31st, 2009 at 11:12 AM ^

Do you know what programs BYU was trying to schedule in 1984 that backed out? Like Hawaii in 2007, they went unbeaten and got rewarded while playing no one in the top 20. Note that I didn't mention Utah in my rant; they actually proved themselves against good opponents. But most years in the WAC and Mountain West aren't like last year. And...ANY time the Rose Bowl is not Big 10/Pac 10 I don't like it.