OT: Wallet Hub Ranks Football Cities

Submitted by wildbackdunesman on February 3rd, 2019 at 5:08 PM

Ann Arbor did okay...ranked 10th for midsized cities and with an overall score higher than Columbus, South Bend, and East Lansing, but below State College.

Ann Arbor was ranked the 5th most engaged "college football" city (#2 in the BigTen behind State College).  We got dinged on expensive ticket prices.  Supposedly we have the 4th most expensive college football tickets.  

 

Out of 230 cities ranked, New York City was ranked #229 in terms of college football engagement...which seems to lend credence that adding Rutgers wouldn't help much inside of NYC media rights.

 

LINK

Arb lover

February 3rd, 2019 at 5:12 PM ^

Even if NYC ranks #229 in CFB engagement, that's still more ad revenue than Michigan at #5 but what all of 150k people on a good day.

Also there are a TON of Michigan grads in NYC who are happy to have B1G access, even if it means Rutgers is the addition.

LSAClassOf2000

February 3rd, 2019 at 8:48 PM ^

I wondered that myself. It certainly isn't through the corporate means like the Gallup survey or things like that, so "engaged" is the one I am most curious about. Just based on subjective experience, I would say that Wolverine fans are pretty damn engaged (or this blog would look way different, for starters), but I would like to know what the metric is precisely. 

SMFH58

February 3rd, 2019 at 5:31 PM ^

I live in CT.  Sports fans in the east have very little interest in college football. And no one is interested in Rutger  football except students or alumni .