After reading thru the list of Big Will supporters, I thought back to all the heated discourse over the spring about Will's playing time. Then I remembered all the other debates when someone called his shot or stated a contrarian opinion that got blasted to bits on the boards only to be proven right. Like, Roh is going to start, Magnus's Boubacar blows you are going to be disappointed epinion(story's not completely over, but Magnus has the lead at the turn). I know it is difficult, because there are so many threads that contain outlandish predictions(did I just post we'll avg 50pts a game, doh?), but while draft reports and recruit class ratings are fun they pale in comparison to the 5 yr look back at said analysis and how wrong or right they were. ESPN's contrarian Craig Roh is the top guy in our class looks good so far. Any thoughts? Maybe we could have 1 monster thread that is put up in August that people could post all their knowledge on(no not that KNOWLEDGE) and strong epinions then after a few days Brian can lock and archive it for yearly review where he could mock or praise as need be.
Full Disclosure-This has nothing to do with my inability to find my "Big Will Concerns" post, that if points were around at the time I would have been digging out of negative points until 2012 or wait we'll all be dead so I would have never gotten out of negative.
Full Discloure 2-Still believe in Big Will, but until his technique is overhauled and his body has had the full 2 year Barwis reconstruction it is hard to evaluate. Many of the players talk about a lack of power early as Barwis strips em down before they power up. My guess is he starts alongside Martin next year in a little beefier Dline with Martin sliding to RVB's spot and RVB taking over for Graham.