ish

May 24th, 2011 at 10:44 AM ^

they had to do this.  there is no way to do it in compliance with Title IX without including non-revenue sports.

Jeff

May 24th, 2011 at 11:05 AM ^

Sure there would be.  Almost all women's sports are equivalency sports, so you could increase 97 of the scholarships that are split up into FCOA scholarships.  So each partial recipient gets a little bit more money.

I'm also not 100% positive that it would be a Title IX violation anyway (although I doubt any school would take a chance).  I haven't checked the numbers but I doubt there is the same amount of money spent on scholarships for men and women.  Don't most compliance efforts revolve around counting the number of athletes? Since there are 97 full scholarships given to men plus 18 (partial) for hockey that's a lot of scholarship ground to make up even ignoring all the other equivalency men's sports.

Edit: After reading the article more closely it says that it would only affect athletes on a full scholarship.  So now the question becomes, are there really the same number of full scholarships given to men and women?  I doubt it.

blacknblue

May 24th, 2011 at 11:57 AM ^

that full athletic scholarships don't already cover the "full cost of attendance". On the other hand I'm pretty sure it would be legal for the schools to direct athletes in the direction of other scholarships to make up the difference.

I had a full academic scholarship and I found additional scholarship to get as close to the full cost of attendance as possible.