Beckum

Submitted by wooderson on

So the whole game here I am assuming Travis Beckum is too injured to play, or why else wouldn't he be playing?  Then, lo and behold, when Wisconsin trails for the first time after the Thompson touchdown Beckum enters the game.  He even looked pretty good when he was out there, it's not like he was Henne or Hart at the end of last year when they clearly weren't at full strength.  Apparently, Bielema only wanted to play Beckum if "they thought they needed him."

I guess I shouldn't really be complaining about this because it was a huge break for Michigan that he missed most of the game.  But still......ouch.  Bielema didn't think they needed him at the start of the game?  I mean I would totally understand if they took him out at some point in the first half after watching the putrid display of the Michigan offense.  But he didn't play a single snap until right at the end of the game.  It just makes me think that despite what Bielema said at the start about Wisconsin taking Michigan seriously... they really weren't at all.  Oh well, makes a already satisfying win even more satisfying!!

hat

September 28th, 2008 at 1:00 AM ^

How weird was it that Beckum played in the first 2-pt attempt, and then was benched for the second one?  Bielema's going to be second-guessing himself for that one.

Chrisgocomment

September 28th, 2008 at 4:18 AM ^

Interesting.  I wonder how Beckum could have changed the game at full strength?  Let's count our blessings that he wasn't 100%. 

I think Wisky underestimated Michigan today.  Luckily for Michigan I think the halftime defict was good.  Wisky came out in the second half flat and never got back into it.