Michigan Sacks Allowed and Sack Rates–2012

Submitted by TESOE on

A few data bites to follow up my Adjusted Line Yards diary last week.  I’m  pursuing the statistical analysis I mentioned in that piece – to quantify the offensive line contribution positive or negative to this years team.  I’m a ways away from that but here are some sack numbers I looked at just tonight.

B1G Sacks and Misc. Passing Stats for 2012 (sans the Nebraska gefarkle last Saturday.) Sacks allowed are a part of most people’s appraisal of OL performance. Mich leads the B1G with the fewest sacks allowed.

TEAM
SACK YDSL ATT YDS TD INT YDS/G
Michigan 15 -120 281 2377 17 18 198
Northwestern 16 -97 333 2002 14 4 166.8
Indiana 17 -81 540 3734 24 13 311.2
Minnesota 18 -138 311 2057 17 14 171.4
Michigan State 19 -134 438 2625 13 10 218.8
Penn State 21 -185 456 3283 24 5 273.6
Purdue 22 -175 448 2888 28 12 240.7
Iowa 22 -156 389 2249 7 8 187.4
Wisconsin 27 -228 274 2114 14 5 162.6
Nebraska 30 -224 351 2700 22 11 207.7
Ohio State 30 -190 278 2178 17 7 181.5
Illinois 39 -230 354 2026 11 14 168.8

Data pulled from ESPN

Woohoo…Go Blue!!!… Hail yeah!… I think to myself…another statistic to stow in my back pocket and share with my Outback buddies.  But the sack rate tells a different story.  Here Michigan is middle of the pack.

 

TEAM

SACK

YDSL

ATT

INT

SACK
RATE

Indiana

17

-81

540

13

3.15%

Michigan State

19

-134

438

10

4.34%

Penn State

21

-185

456

5

4.61%

Northwestern

16

-97

333

4

4.80%

Purdue

22

-175

448

12

4.91%

Michigan

15

-120

281

18

5.34%

Iowa

22

-156

389

8

5.66%

Minnesota

18

-138

311

14

5.79%

Nebraska

30

-224

351

11

8.55%

Wisconsin

27

-228

274

5

9.85%

Ohio State

30

-190

278

7

10.79%

Illinois

39

-230

354

14

11.02%

This is by far the more important stat here.  Michigan is decidedly average by this measure.

Let me just take this opportunity to say WTF Indiana?  I’m very surprised to find their protection and passing totals league leading.  Hats off to them.  If only they could have beat Ohio I’d really give them credit.

This sack rate doesn’t take into account scrambles though… let’s do that…uh…wait a minute… I don’t have a great way of doing that.  Let me know how you might suggest.  I’m pulling data from www.CFBstats.com .  They like the NCAA count sacks and scrambles as Rushes.  I could  (and in fact did) look at all the passing downs though and factor any rush yards as scrambles.   Passing downs are passes (regardless of down/distance …obviously) and 2nd and 8+ yards or 3rd/4th downs and 5+ yards.  Here are those numbers…broken down by QB du jour.

 
QB
Sacks Total
Passing
Downs
Sack Rate
Robinson 4 196 2.04%
Gardner 8 105 7.62%
Bellomy 3 25 12.00%
Total 15 326
4.60%

Why so different?  Same O line very different modes.  As Taylor showed us in the game that wasn’t … scrambles can hurt you.

image

Photo from ESPN highlights

But Taylor was sacked 30 times for the Huskers (again without the “Championship” numbers added in.)   Sacks and sack rates are deceptive numbers wrt OL performance.  I think there is a general tell there but it says more about a QB’s style than OL protection.

Here I broke down the sack yard losses by QB for Mich…

image

You can begin to see the bimodal… trimodal nature of our QBs…

Here’s similar data including the positive scramble yards (again classified as rushing yards gained on passing downs.)

image

I labeled Denards long runs… to show how early they came in the season.  Defenses stayed home later in the year (then rushed like the dickens when Denard went down.)  Devin was able to make them pay – mostly with his arm.

In short – I’m not too impressed with sack stats to appraise college offensive lines.  I wish I had snap to whistle time data for each play.  I think that would be a better stat in terms of protection – though some QBs have the scramble down.  Devin certainly has an eye for his blind side.

We’ll see if I have more time for this.  See you guys at the Outback Bowl.  Go Blue!

Comments