"(I) think about 'The Lion King,' Simba gets hit over the head and (he's told) 'the past can hurt,' " Harbaugh said Monday afternoon. "'You can either run from it or embrace it and learn from it.'
In case you missed it, Huge had a phenominal 17+ minute interview with Greg yesterday. I could listen to Mattison talk all day long. It's so easy to see how he's such a fantastic recruiter. http://www.wbbl.com/common/page.php?pt=WBBL-FM+Podcasts&id=87&is_corp=0
days until Team 134 sends an opponent flying through the air,
days until Old 98 is brought back into circulation (last issued when this guy was earning All-America honors),
days until it is time to BEAT OHIO.
This poster was tweeted my Coach Funk. I assume this is the official season poster? It appears to me that this is the matte helmet similar to the one in the Outback Bowl. Are we to assume it will be worn again this season?
It was just brought to my attention that the athletic department today has changed its policy regarding seat cushions in response to the outcry they received. Outside seat cushions are now ALLOWED in Michigan Stadium.
As many of you know, Coach Hoke spent the day at ESPN fielding mostly silly questions. And, being Coach Hoke, he gave mostly boring answers. But here are two quotes that caught my interest:
“One of the surprise dark-horse guys will be a young man we redshirted a year ago, a wide receiver, Jehu Chesson. A young man out of St. Louis. Six-four, wide receiver, track guy, can catch it, works hard.”
There's been so much talk about Darboh, I was sure that's where coach Hoke would go. Or even to RB, with all the Drake Johnson and Justice Hayes fluff we've heard (which there was some more of today). Hearing Chesson's name is a pleasant surprise and, if he were to emerge, would be a huge boost to our offense.
“We’re young in a couple places. We’re young in the guard position, offensively, the center position, but we have a lot of young depth and competition. On the defensive side of it, the interior of our defensive linemen and our strong end, our five-technique, are going to be young players, but we really like how, genetically, how they’ve worked at it.”
What I found interesting about this is that Black, Washington, and Ash are all juniors and seniors. Pipkins--the only other player on our roster to get significant snaps on the line last year--is a sophomore. Henry is a RS Frosh. The only other true DT's (Poggi, Hurst) are true freshmen. Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I think this comment signals that we'll see a lot of Pipkins (starting?) and a good amount of Henry (more of a surprise) this year.
In the spirit of the actual purpose of the board and the catalyst being the NW undebate in an earlier thread today, I present the B10 one-a-days: a daily series of threads to discuss each of the B10 teams upcoming 2013 season. Debate is open and encouraged, but please provide cogent reasons behind your opinions. I'll outline some subfields of discussion below. If I can't remember to post one of these every day, feel free to check the board and do it yourself if you wish, but maybe provide a link to the previous threads. I plan on including ND as well.
- NW's overall talent, depth, youth/experience
- Schedule strength
- Past recent success/patterns
- Position group strength
- Your expected record/finish in B10 and/or bowl
- Anything else at all.
I base my stuff on the HTTV and The Wolverine previews. I usually grab a Phil Steel, but didn't get a chance yet this year to see what he says about the Cats. Links to NW blogs would be great too.
I think NW is middle of the road when it comes to pure talent, obvs not at OSU, M and Neb's level, but solidly in a pack with PSU, MSU, Wisc. The thing is, they return a TON of proven skill position talent on offense, including 9/10 receivers. They return 2 experience QBs in Colter and Siemian and a 6 ypc RB. They only need to replace 3 OLs, which could spell trouble early in the season @ Cal and Vs Syracuse.
Defensively, they have to replace some LBer production, but I trust PatFitz's staff to keep that a non-negative position group in the B10. They have lots of returning experience on the DL (which should take pressure off the LBers), but the secondary is the weakness. They don't have the horses defensively to hold good offensive teams down, but they should play responsibly and relatively mistake free.
I'm high on NW, but their schedule is BRUTAL. A tough start @ Cal and Vs Cuse will likely result in a split as the young OL comes together agaist these 2 decent teams. I usually like laughing at Cuse, but they did win the Pinstripe Bowl in convincing fashion over WBGV last year and are on the rise from the bottomest of bottoms.
Loss at home vs OSU and M, wins at Neb and vs MSU. I also see a coinflip loss at Wisc as well. I'd be more concerned about M losing this one if we didn't travel so well and if I didn't trust this D to maintain it's production. So, that adds up to 8-4 (5-3) for a 2nd place finish in the THANKGODIDONTNEEDTOREMEMBERTHESENAMES* Division. I want to go with 9-3 (6-2) but the schedule and NWs relative lack of depth as a program prevent a serious run at the B10 title game.
* other divison: the AGOODDECISIONNOTTOPUTEFFORTINLEARNIGNTHESENAMES Division.