|03/17/2009 - 10:21pm||yes||
|03/07/2009 - 4:56am||Where did you play?||
Where did you play?
|03/05/2009 - 1:44pm||Oh, so are you saying .500 is||
Oh, so are you saying .500 is some sort of threshold that would get us in because we have some big wins to go along with it?
|03/02/2009 - 12:31am||haha pun intended?||
haha pun intended?
|03/01/2009 - 5:32pm||It may be ridiculous, but||
It may be ridiculous, but when I ask myself whether I feel our chances to win at Minnesota are significantly increased by Brian not hosting a liveblog, I most definitely do.
|02/28/2009 - 1:13am||karpo,
Try bringing this up
Try bringing this up again in a few months. If no one here is planning on skipping out on tickets next year, I know at least a few people who would definitely do it for 20 bucks.
|02/27/2009 - 10:03pm||Student ticket sales are||
Student ticket sales are mostly online now, I think.
|02/13/2009 - 7:48pm||!= as in "is not equal to".||
!= as in "is not equal to".
|02/11/2009 - 1:29am||lol you sounded pretty||
lol you sounded pretty serious
|02/05/2009 - 12:36am||The USNews ranking system is||
The USNews ranking system is biased against public schools; that's not a new idea.
Look at their ranking methodology:
As college football fans, we all know about the problems with rankings. That being said, the quality of education at Michigan is definitely what you make of it.
|02/04/2009 - 4:33am||You never go full retard.||
You never go full retard.
|01/30/2009 - 9:40pm||Didn't we used to have||
Didn't we used to have stickers?
|01/29/2009 - 5:45am||http://www.youtube.com/watch?|
|01/28/2009 - 10:16pm||I care about hockey, and I||
I care about hockey, and I think Michigan fans in general care too.
|01/28/2009 - 10:52am||This was definitely a joke||
This was definitely a joke hahaha
|01/28/2009 - 8:51am||lol wow, I got a pretty good||
lol wow, I got a pretty good laugh out of that.
|01/23/2009 - 1:41pm||OH oops I see
Losers from the
OH oops I see
Losers from the top 4, losers from the bottom 4.
|01/23/2009 - 12:38pm||I don't think the visual aid||
I don't think the visual aid matches the description. The image seems to make more sense than the way you described it though; an 8-team bracket would have only 4 losers after the first round, so for the bottom 4 losers to be eliminated and the top 4 losers to play the next round, well.. I don't understand.
Did you mean that the bottom 2 losers get eliminated?
|01/20/2009 - 2:53am||I'm confused. Why do you post||
I'm confused. Why do you post on this board? This isn't me telling you to leave or anything like that; I'm just curious.
|01/18/2009 - 7:29pm||Is Texas' fight song 'I've||
Is Texas' fight song 'I've been working on a railroad'?
|01/18/2009 - 7:27pm||Trgovac a possiblity for||
Trgovac a possiblity for what? For a truly informative post, it seems like "Trgovac a possibility for new DC" would be necessary. But no matter how much complaining there is, I don't think every poster is ever going to be that clear in their titles.
|01/18/2009 - 7:25pm||I'm definitely with all of||
I'm definitely with all of you that informative titles make the board a lot better. I just don't think it's as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
"Trgovac" ended up being a post about Trgovac. True, it's ambiguous, but in no way is this the least informative one out there.
|01/18/2009 - 6:41pm||Promote RichRod, look at||
Promote RichRod, look at anyaskman's post titled "not so much" like 3 posts above yours and tell me your last post doesn't sound like an argument for his point. The headline for this thread isn't misleading or purposefully fake. I looked at the title and instantly knew it was about Trgovac. It told me what his post was going to be about; that seems informative enough to me.
I don't post too often on this board; I really just like to read and browse, and the non-informative thread titles are annoying, but certainly are not the big deal people are making it.
|01/17/2009 - 6:36am||EnjoyLife, your posts seem||
EnjoyLife, your posts seem so.. contrived that you almost sound like Rita Skeeter from the Harry Potter books.
Anyway, Pete Carroll is generally known as a really good guy; why not give him the benefit of the doubt?
|01/14/2009 - 4:58pm||That is the general consensus||
That is the general consensus on this board, yeah, but how do we actually know this? I'd love to believe that Rich Rodriguez didn't run him away, but as far as I've seen, there isn't much proof.
What proof is out there?
|01/13/2009 - 5:53pm||Some ushers are really lax||
Some ushers are really lax about these things. There's one usher who works football games who I know almost never checks tickets for his section.
|01/13/2009 - 1:08pm||disagree||
On what grounds do you say that?
|01/11/2009 - 3:45pm||lol
|01/10/2009 - 7:09pm||Ann Arbor under fresh snow is||
Ann Arbor under fresh snow is SO nice. If it doesn't get too cold, they might really like it.
|01/08/2009 - 11:39pm||What? A lot of interceptions||
What? A lot of interceptions are receivers messing up.
But maybe if you get angry and swear more I'll change my mind.
|01/08/2009 - 11:35pm||Who's that NBA announcer who||
Who's that NBA announcer who likes to use the 'no regard for human life' line?
If you don't know what I'm talking about, it goes something like this:
"AND LEBRON JAMES--WITH NO REGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE, THROWS IT DOWN"
That guy sucks.
|01/08/2009 - 11:24pm||I don't care if you like||
I don't care if you like Florida or not.
That was a cool interception.
|01/08/2009 - 9:37pm||I'm not religious, but it's||
I'm not religious, but it's ridiculous to hate on him for being a good person. What he believes is his business.
Would you rather see someone like Maurice Clarett getting the success Tebow's gotten?
|01/08/2009 - 9:33pm||It's actually a really good||
It's actually a really good game. And that's what commercial breaks are for.
|01/08/2009 - 9:02pm||lol yeah I hate media hype
lol yeah I hate media hype
|01/08/2009 - 8:58pm||Defense is part of good||
Defense is part of good football, in my opinion.
This game is better than most of hte other OU games this season.
|01/06/2009 - 3:55am||wait why?||
wait do you guys have more than michigan games on there?
|01/06/2009 - 3:36am||I don't know, but I feel like||
I don't know, but I feel like if we ALL talk about how the rivalry is above anything else, and we ALL love to root against the Buckeyes, it's.. not actually that much more to feel good when they lose and, heaven forbid, feel good together by talking about it.
An OSU loss in an OSU loss, regardless of whether we've beaten them. This is the spirit of the rivalry, isn't it? Or should we pretend we're above feeling good when they lose?
If you're against trash talking in general, then whatever; otherwise, leave him alone.
|01/05/2009 - 12:35am||Texas winning big adds||
Texas winning big adds another argument for a playoff.
|01/03/2009 - 3:36pm||I disagree. I think the||
I disagree. I think the guy's right. Will Campbell's committing might make one or both of these guys reconsider.
|01/03/2009 - 3:35pm||Have you ever considered that||
Have you ever considered that not everyone is as scheming as you think?
|01/03/2009 - 3:34pm||It's possible that not||
It's possible that not everyone is as scheming as you think they are.
|01/03/2009 - 3:12pm||I don't think he'll go to||
I don't think he'll go to OSU: he doesn't have too many ties to the school, and why bother? There are so many other options, and Pryor is only a sophomore.
But I'm not that impressed with him. For some reason, I thought he 'd be a lot better.
|01/03/2009 - 3:09pm||wooooooooo||
|01/03/2009 - 4:46am||They didn't really take us||
They didn't really take us that seriously after the first half, though, did they?
|01/03/2009 - 4:45am||I could be wrong, but I don't||
I could be wrong, but I don't think there are that many 14 year olds on this site.
Just a general atmosphere of attempted (though usually not very funny) humor.
|01/01/2009 - 3:44am||Just wondering, can we have||
Just wondering, can we have the link to the stream?
If it's not on a paysite, that is.
|12/26/2008 - 9:50pm||You're right in that no one's||
You're right in that no one's opinion here will change the world: so why take everything you discuss so seriously? There's no reason to get so excited about someone else's opinion.
Instead of trying to prove me wrong, why not take a moment to think about why someone would call you out like this. If your arrogance doesn't allow you to acknowledge that your love for online fighting is a detriment to this board and that the way you write is extremely condescending, then I guess nothing will change.
And also, you're saying that my original comment made so little sense that you..laughed. Right. Don't try so hard next time, Magnus.
|12/24/2008 - 5:42pm||I'm sorry for hurting your||
I'm sorry for hurting your feelings, but your notions of an answer involves proving to everyone else that you know more than they do about football, even when the question involves nothing other than personal opinion. You should realize that "Which loss was worse?" is prompting a discussion, not a definite answer. But no, you feel the need to rush in and save the day with your gloriously superior judgment.
|12/24/2008 - 3:55pm||Magnus, I really would like||
Magnus, I really would like to know how you came to be such a tool.
Before he wrote anything, he wrote, "To me . . ."
Anyway, the Toledo loss isn't IN MY OPINION (Magnus, this means I don't want to deal with your bs please don't flame me) worse than the App. State game, but it sucked almost as much because it completely sucked what little hope was left that came after the win against Wisconsin.