Member for

7 years 8 months
Points
12.00

Recent Comments

Date Title Body
10/20/2014 - 3:58pm Trend Model Predicts

Trend model predicts we'll score 18 points (R-sq = .86).  I think I would actually be okay with this offensive output.

02/04/2014 - 3:54pm More like 0.1%

More like 0.1% or 0.2% if you want probability of "at least 7 of 8". 

THE NUMBERS HURT

01/17/2014 - 7:47pm Oh wow

Haven't heard that name in a while

09/04/2013 - 12:07pm 17-14 Blue

Beat those Fig Things!

08/29/2013 - 2:04pm 24 - 9 Blue

Yup

01/09/2013 - 6:25pm In the words of Gus Johnson...

...ughrgl!

10/24/2012 - 11:45am Mich 35 Neb 14

um 35

corn 14

211 rushing

10/17/2012 - 11:16am 24-21 Michigan

298 rushing yards.

03/29/2012 - 2:51pm Closer to Boulder?

Conor O'Neil's in Boulder is a much more low key version of Lodo's experience.  Much better food too!

 

1922 13th Street, Boulder, CO

05/17/2011 - 12:36pm "the turnover margin they

"the turnover margin they enjoy one year has virtually zero predictive value for the turnover margin they will enjoy the next year. That means that on average, teams with substantially positive margins will see major decline in margin the next year, and teams with substantially negative margins will see major improvement the next year."

This is just plain wrong.  If there was no predictive value for year over year turnover margin, then how can we predict major declines or improvement for teams with substantial margins?  That would imply a high negative correlation.  No correlation (or low as is 12%) means that it is random and unpredictable.