What are you interested to see in the bowl game?

Submitted by taistreetsmyhero on
Aside from the obvious (win the game), what are you interested to see from Michigan in the bowl game? Personally, I’m very curious what the offense looks like—assuming Peters is cleared to play and stays healthy enough to start. Does the game plan revert to the bare bones attack that Peters previously led, or does it stay wide open and see if Peters executes on similarly beautiful playcalls that O’Korn couldn’t? How does the passing game look if Pep Hamilton is indeed hired away? Who takes over what responsibilities if that happens? How does the OL look? Does Onwenu retake his starting job? JBB? Does Ruiz get any run at center? Can they sustain their promising rush AND pass blocking against another solid opponent? What are your thoughts/curiosities?

Heisman212

November 27th, 2017 at 2:23 PM ^

There going to put us against Stanford or Arizona. There’s no way in hell we could afford to lose to Rich Rod. I want to see a team that is considering the bowl game the start of 2018 and hammer someone.

JHumich

November 27th, 2017 at 2:28 PM ^

2 fast scores early with a balanced offense, then the rest of the game on the ground

>400 yds rushing

>35 minutes time of possession

defensive shutout

+2 or more on turnovers

And then, after the game, I want to hear the same speech as Saturday. "We worked hard. I love coaching these guys. We've got to get better. That continues tomorrow"

LSAClassOf2000

November 27th, 2017 at 2:56 PM ^

It's fun to see them whip out the part of the playbook you never typically see in the bowl games, although that can also be frustrating, but I would be far more interesting in seeing a nice, dominating performance on both sides of the ball from start to finish. If nothing else, it would end the season on a relatively high note and give us something upbeat to discuss as we fade into the football-less morass of hoops and other news in January. 

boliver46

November 27th, 2017 at 2:29 PM ^

of abuse:

What I am looking for is the ability to field a Quarterback who was NOT incapacitated by an illegal/dirty hit.

#ThankYouSantaTaiStreetsIsMyHero

Chitown Kev

November 27th, 2017 at 2:26 PM ^

I want to see Stanford play Michigan...although...a USC/Michigan Holiday Bowl would be more interesting to me than a Washington/Michigan Holiday Bowl... 

...other than that, I'm ready to see a fully repped Peters play with a greaters assortment of plays and weapons.

ijohnb

November 27th, 2017 at 2:37 PM ^

don't you just not post anymore?

Are you doing the thing where you want off MGoBlog as kind of "life change" thing?  Where you decide Michigan football and this blog aren't healthy anymore and you decide you are going "to go in a different direction" with things.  Yeah, I used to get that.   I have realized now that there is nothing I can do and Michigan football will be part of my life no matter how much it hurts.

In reply to by ijohnb

Blue in Paradise

November 27th, 2017 at 2:55 PM ^

with the Detroit Lions!

Btw/ I am really excited about Michigan in 2018.  The intelligent folks on this Board have been talking about 2017 being the year after "The Year" and before "The Year Part 2". 

We will be a top 10 team next year either in the CFP or in the conversation late - put that in the bank.  And we won't look back thereafter...

uferfan

November 27th, 2017 at 2:27 PM ^

We played 85% of the time like Alabama, and 15% of the time like Illinois.

In the bowl game, I'd like to see that 15% improve from Illinois to Indiana or better.

GoBlueInAlabama

November 27th, 2017 at 2:28 PM ^

I'd like to see Ruiz get some game action at center. I think that will give us a glimpse of 4 of 5 starters for next season. I'd also like to see Eubanks and Black play if they are cleared and healthy.

chunkums

November 27th, 2017 at 2:31 PM ^

It would be nice to see Ruiz legitimately supplant Kugler so we can have MAXIMUM BEEF on the interior line. This would make me feel much better about next year. Also, healthy Peters with a gameplan tailored to him behind an OL that's performing much better would be nice. Hopefully the scheme can get guys screamingly open again in the bowl and Peters can connect with DPJ a number of times. 

DrMantisToboggan

November 27th, 2017 at 2:36 PM ^

Tarik Black. The coaches should not pursue a medshirt as he won't be here for the duration of his eligibility, and he should be healthy. I think the practice and game experience are more valuable to him/our offense than a potential extra year of eligibility.

Tuebor

November 27th, 2017 at 2:39 PM ^

Most winnable game possible, even if it means a less prestigious bowl.  Let Northwestern and MSU go ahead of us in the bowl pecking order.

 

That and if Peters starts, I'd like to see him get through the entire game without missing a play for injury.

DrMantisToboggan

November 27th, 2017 at 3:07 PM ^

Washington is done playing and 10-2. They will easily finish in the top 16 in the CFP rankings (probably 12 or 13) and are in line for the best bowl bid from the Pac-12. They're much more likely to get an NY6 bowl than fall to the Holiday Bowl. I would be shocked if our opponent was anyone other than Stanford or Washington State.

 

Edit: maybe you meant Washington State and not Washington. My apologies if so.

ijohnb

November 27th, 2017 at 2:48 PM ^

and I are disagreeing today.  I want to play in the Holiday Bowl against a good PAC 10 team.  I don't want to play in the Red Lobster Bowl against Wake Forest Tech or somebody.  If Peters plays we are good enough to play with or beat Stanford, Washington, etc.  A Michigan v. Stanford matchup in the Holiday Bowl would be really cool and one of the premiere non NY6 bowl games. 

A Lot of Milk

November 27th, 2017 at 2:45 PM ^

I'd love to see Higdon crack 1000 yards for the season. I think he just needs around 90 or 100. Been a tough runner all year and it would be our first 1000 yard RB since Fitz in 2011