Today on Outside The Lines

Submitted by RedGreene on April 15th, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Guess who will be featured on Outside The Lines? Come on, only one guess? That's right, Rich Rodriguez will be one of 3 high profile coaches featured on Outside The Lines today at 3pm. I'm sure the topic of discussion will be the Brock Mealer story.



April 15th, 2010 at 3:26 PM ^

Did they get the two "columnist" from the Stupid & Ugly Bald Guys Convention?

The question was asked what RR needs to do to keep his job. Drew Sharp said he has to win at least 9 games and 2 of the 9 have to be against OSU & MSU. He also said the RR has to stop with the arrogance. He said RR always thinks he's the smartest guy in the room and that he smirks a lot.

The goofy looking guy from the Charleston Gazette mumbled something about West Virginia fans being upset that every time something good happens to one of it's sports programs, it is overshadowed by RR and his stupidity.

For those of you who didn't get to see the program, if the two of them were to mate and have a love child, it would look like Justin Boren.


April 15th, 2010 at 3:29 PM ^

Yes. If we beat Ohio State and go 9-3, RR will be fired. I mean, how could we keep the guy under those circumstances?

That is an example of a question that can only yield stupid answers. But I admit, that answer is particularly stupid even following the dumb setup.


April 15th, 2010 at 3:41 PM ^

Breaking New:

Rich Rodriguez yelled at his wife today. Then he proceeded to eat a lunch high in fat and cholesterol. He also wore a plaid shirt with striped pants, and jaywalked across Packard St. Clearly this behavior can not be tolerated. The NCAA and U of M must stand up and stop this horrible man from further influencing and corrupting their upstanding student athletes.


April 15th, 2010 at 3:45 PM ^

Seriously, is this a joke? Is the network of dorks giving Drew Sharp a platform to trash RichRod? If so, the forces of darkness are greater than I ever imagined.


April 15th, 2010 at 4:23 PM ^

"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat."

Teddy Roosevelt
"Citizenship in a Republic,"
Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910


April 15th, 2010 at 7:58 PM ^

Though I prefer hilarious humiliation to outright violence. Many more +1's to anyone who gives him a stink-palm or "accidentally" pisses all over his pant leg while standing next to him at the trough (though I'm guessing the troughs have sadly all been replaced by now, my offer still stands if anyone meets Sharp at the urinal or whatever fancy pee-catching contraption has now been installed at the Big House).

Tim Waymen

April 15th, 2010 at 10:40 PM ^

It'd be the most deserved and applauded punching of a reporter's face since John McClane's wife punched out that obnoxious reporter guy (who seems to always have that same exact role) at the end of Die Hard 1, only it'd be much more awesome since Drew Sharp is an actual, living miserable piece-of-shit reporter.

And who knows? Maybe you'd get away with just a restraining order like Holly does, since probably very few people actually like Drew Sharp.


April 15th, 2010 at 10:40 PM ^

It's really unfortunate that ESPN every year has to put on a constant media blitz against coaches that they feel should be fired. First they bring on their pundits to talk about coaches on the hot seat. Next they bring on biased journalists to confirm the suspicions of the pundits. Then they air quotes from AD's and such saying things like X's job is safe, and twist it into X's job is only safe for now. Finally, if the coach is let go, they act all shocked and talk about the drama and how only they saw it coming. If somehow they turn it around, then the same pundits talk about how the coach persevered through all the criticism to win. It's such BS and unimaginative. I wish ESPN would just go back to reporting news and get rid of the drama.

Oh, they use the same formula for scandals (real or imaginary), trades, signing of coaches or players, etc. It's f'ing stupid. If RR had just come out Mike Gundy style, he'd have no problems and the Free press would be out of press.