jmblue

March 11th, 2010 at 4:10 PM ^

I propose that Tim Tebow no longer be a subject of conversation here. But since it's been brought up, I believe a person of average intelligence is supposed to score 21 or thereabouts, so he's right in the middle of the bell distribution. The median for an NFL QB is 24, so he's a hair below that, but I don't know if that's even a statistically significant difference. In short, it's another Tebow non-story.

CRex

March 11th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^

He'll likely still get drafted, sign some form of contract and make more money than most of us will. So I doubt he cares that much. If I was a pro prospect I'd just bomb the thing on purpose.

Tacopants

March 11th, 2010 at 5:04 PM ^

The Wonderlic tests for intelligence, complex decision making, etc. I can take it and probably score at least a 30, it doesnt turn me into Dan Marino either. If you have 2 versions of Sam Bradford, one of which scores a 10 on the Wonderlic and the other scores a 30, which one do you choose?

restive neb

March 11th, 2010 at 7:27 PM ^

There's a reason scouts don't just give athletes one test. There are several factors that determine success, and several ways to measure each factor. Arm strength and accuracy are necessary to deliver a throw, but brains are required to know where and when to deliver it. I believe Brian Griese scored a 37, which gives some indication why he's survived in the NFL for over a decade without great arm strength.

M-Wolverine

March 11th, 2010 at 4:16 PM ^

The Wonderlic was designed to test mere mortals. Edit: The "Wonderlic Test" sounds like it should be a measure for hookers.

blueloosh

March 11th, 2010 at 4:17 PM ^

I opened an article this morning on this, under some blaring headline like "Tebow does terrible on Wonderlic." Then I read an article stating that he got a 22 while the average is 24. Oh really? Incredible. Yes, hardy har har ... Mr. perfect is not so smart. I understand a lot of people are eager to see him fail or be exposed as a hypocrite but let's at least wait until there is something newsworthy to talk about. EDIT: my comments are not directed at the original poster, but the people framing and titling news stories.

mgopat

March 11th, 2010 at 4:32 PM ^

If the average for an NFL QB is a 24 and he got a 22, then he essentially performed average. Yet another Tebow non-story. I'm less interested in predicting how he will perform in the NFL than I am in watching it unfold. Whether he succeeds or fails as a QB, it will be compelling to watch.

BlueVoix

March 11th, 2010 at 4:34 PM ^

I still can't believe Florida has a Family, Youth, and Community Services major. Does that teach you how to be a recreation coordinator at the local park?

bluebyyou

March 11th, 2010 at 4:37 PM ^

Marino and Kelly both scored 15's. They sucked, right? Tebow had a 3.66 GPA, but of course he only practiced 20 hours a week. Kind of makes you wonder about the predictive value of the test.

bronxblue

March 11th, 2010 at 4:47 PM ^

With respect to the GPA, let it be known that it was in something called "family, youth and community services". So let's not give that too much predictive value either. While I agree that putting too much stock in the Wonderlic score will make anyone look foolish, the fact remains that in order for Tebow to even contemplate a realistic chance of starting in the NFL, he'll need to pick up a playbook quickly while also drastically overhauling his throwing motion. While those skills may not be characterized as purely "intelligence", a below-average score on a relatively simple logic exam certainly doesn't instill much confidence in me that he'll be able to make the transition.

UMFootballCrazy

March 11th, 2010 at 8:33 PM ^

Neither won a superbowl. Farve scored low on the Wonderlic, and what is his signature curse? Bad decision making under pressure when the game is on. The Wonderlic measures inteligence under pressure, assessing a problem quickly, making a proper analysis and then the right decision. Essential QB skills. Mcnabb had a low Wonderlic and has he ever won a superbowl? Brady, Manning and Brees? All scored well on the Wonderlic.

Magnus

March 11th, 2010 at 8:47 PM ^

...that you have no point. Brett Favre won a Super Bowl, and McNabb didn't. Also, Brett Favre played on a team that had virtually zero other bona fide NFL stars on the roster. You think Dorsey Levens or Robert Brooks is headed to the Hall of Fame? Also, Brett Favre has won exactly the same number of Super Bowls (1) as two of the guys you listed as doing well on the Wonderlic (Brees and Manning). Consider me unconvinced by your meandering argument.

burntorange wi…

March 11th, 2010 at 8:50 PM ^

not entirely sold that the wonderlic is a good way to measure the qb's ability to respond under pressure. i dont think that answering questions in a certain amount of time translates to throwing to a receiver in a certain amount of time before a linebacker takes ur head off. ryan fitzpatrick scores a 50 and therefore hes a good quarterback? nope, back up on the rams. not even close to "good." colt mccoy allegedly scored a 25/50. therefore he should throw picks under pressure? 70 percent completion % last year and 12 picks in 470 attempts. i hate the wonderlic and i think its a waste of time. taking it is 100% unnecessary IMHO.