scout:Movement on the DC Front?

Submitted by hart97 on
any one know what thats about? is the new DC hired?

AMazinBlue

January 14th, 2009 at 11:35 PM ^

in 2004, were pretty good. Texas allowed around 3.18 y/c and only gave up 114 y/g passing and allowed 19.7 ppg. His resume' includes three Rose Bowls and 2 Super Bowls. How good were the Broncos after he left? How good were the Patriots after the whale left? GR meant more to Denver than tubby meant to NE. Possibly a good hire. Better than JH from a media spin standpoint and middle-of-the-road enough to keep the political factions quiet. Question is, does RR want to bank his HC future on the guy to bombed at Syracuse. Maybe GR is a much better DC than HC.

jBdub

January 15th, 2009 at 9:32 AM ^

The Broncos' D only gave up two touchdowns in the '98 playoffs, one after a fumble on the 1 yd. line, and one in the fourth qtr. of the Super Bowl after the game was decided. So it might not have been all Elway. And we can discuss him now because Sam Webb from GoBlueWolverine put his name out on the airways of Ann Arbor this morning.

MGoJoe

January 15th, 2009 at 1:10 AM ^

Why do I have the feeling that Tyrone Willingham will be the next DC? Is it his Michigan ties? NFL experience? Obvious relegation to a non-head coaching role?

bluebloodedfan

January 15th, 2009 at 1:37 AM ^

So you guys are saying that Rex Ryan will not be the next DC at Uof M? That can't be true because Tim Tebow came to me last night in a dream and told me the great prophecy about the lion and the lamb laying down in the field was an allegory for RR and RR sharing the same sideline. So you guys are saying that that isn't true? Are you guys saying that Tebow is a liar?... NO! I won't believe it! You guys are the LIARS! ALL OF YOU!! Brian, ban the bunch of them! Ban them so we can bask in the glory of the knowledge of Tebow being right . yes . (laughs maniacally)

chally

January 15th, 2009 at 9:23 AM ^

On the one hand, he's been a part of a number of very good teams. I like that he was well-respected enough to get a head coaching job at a decent school, and that he was well-liked enough to keep that job for four years despite a dismal performance. He also has the kind of name recognition that gets people excited (I know my first instinct, without looking at any of his teams' stats, was "heh, cool."). On the other hand, his team's defense over the last few years has been abysmal. If he was really such a defensive coordinator, I would have expected more. Even if he gave some control over to his own DC at 'Cuse, one would expect him to have stepped in when he saw that things weren't working. One possibility is that he wasn't able to recruit the kind of talent needed to hang in the Big East, but lack of recruiting ability is just another indictment. If his 'Cuse team had been terrible, but had a great defense, I would probably be thrilled with the hire. Instead, I'm not really sure what to think.

Seth

January 15th, 2009 at 10:46 AM ^

A guy at my office used to cover MSU and U-M sports for the Oakland Press and is usually a good source for letting me know WHEN something's going to happen (since they call his old comrades) but not WHAT. He's a State fan (which is like a prerequisite for being a sportswriter around the tri-county area). Anyway, he said he'd come by and let me know if gets wind of anything that would interest me. I would expect I'd hear from him if there was a presser being called to announce a DC.