Scouting the Enemy: Ohio State QBs are Good

Submitted by Occam's Razor on

I was curious to see how the replacement QBs for JT Barrett would fair in their spring game and well, lets just say I think OSU's offense got a bit more dynamic in the QB department. 

This also made their WRs look a lot better relatively. 

Dwayne Haskins (raises fist in air in anger) went 9/19 120 yards with 2 great throws to Jaylen Harris (25 yards) and Ben Victor (43 yards) 

Joe Burrow is giving Haskins a run for his money going 15/22 238 yards with another pair of great throws both to Demario McCall for 50 and 42 yards

Lastly, redshirt freshman Tate Martell seems to be the most JT-like in that he's a great runner but mediocre passer rushing 9 times for 59 yards while completing 5/16 for 28 yards. 

Spring game caveats apply, but this year's OSU team is NOT going to be like the past 2 years with either Haskins or Burrow starting. 

I hope our safeties are ready come November. 

 

BigBlue02

April 15th, 2018 at 5:50 PM ^

It wasn’t highly complicated 2 years ago when we had a whole shitload of upperclassmen catching passes from Speight. Then, surprise, we have all new wide receivers and tight ends and Speight goes down and we struggle. Maybe the offense isn’t super tough to grasp, it’s that JOK was just a shitty QB and Peters, being a redshirt freshman, wasn’t up to the task.

BigBlue02

April 15th, 2018 at 6:04 PM ^

If you are judging Haskins on last year’s game against us, why include his stats from the spring game? Because throwing for 120 yards on under 50% completion percentage is shitty. Also, saying Haskins is somehow “for sure a better passer than JT”, a multi year starter, from a couple passes in a game against us, is fucking ridiculous. You are very concern troll-ey right now

BigBlue02

April 15th, 2018 at 10:01 PM ^

JT Barrett hit nearly 65 percent of his passes for 3000 yards and 35 touchdowns and a 160 passer rating last year. All those averages are better than Haskins numbers in the spring game and they were in actual games versus people trying to tackle him. Haskins hasn’t done shit and he’s definitely not a much better passer than Barrett

TdK71

April 16th, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

...was prepped to step in in case The OSU offense was struggling late in the game.

Don Brown had Barrett locked up tight and Meyer knew it, he probably figured that Michigan prepped the D to stop Barrett but not anyone else. When Haskins came in I told my wife that this could be trouble, and it was.

That being said I think that any QB they play  against us this year is going to have a very difficult time of it, and if we can limit te QB in the Meyer Offense we stand a pretty good chance of winning the game provided we don't make any stupid mistakes.

evenyoubrutus

April 15th, 2018 at 3:05 PM ^

Weird, because generally when Michigan has a spring scrimmage, it's bad news about the defense when our QB has a good day. Remember? The defense should always be ahead of the offense in Spring. Just sayin'.

chatster

April 15th, 2018 at 4:44 PM ^

Is Hole Fucking one of those "club sports" like Quidditch and Ultimate Frisbee that don't count towards the Directors Cup standings?

(Typos: The Bane of the MGoBlog Existence)

Rose Bowl

April 15th, 2018 at 3:06 PM ^

Actually OSU has never had a QB win the Super Bowl, but their system makes their QB's look good.  Just win.

M-Dog

April 15th, 2018 at 3:19 PM ^

They never do crap in the NFL.  But they play in a system that's great for college QBs.  

That's how it should be.

I personally only care about Michigan's NFL QB success in terms of how well it lets us recruit. 

So that we can win games.

Or . . . you could just have a system that already wins games in college. 

That works too. 

micheal honcho

April 15th, 2018 at 3:45 PM ^

Let’s run a high IQ offense like a triple option(navy style) with 5x better, bigger, faster athletes.
If the academy’s can get the wins they do with the extreme disadvantages they have I’d say that is the best “system” offense that exists.
It makes more sense than being another also ran running a spread and still falling short because we can’t match 5*s in the arms race vs. OSU & the southern schools.

If you really think that a spread would even slightly improve our chances vs. the powerhouses like OSU I’ll ask one question. What offense would they know best how to defend? Maybe the one they run?

micheal honcho

April 15th, 2018 at 4:56 PM ^

In the 5* contest Clemson had more so they won. Had nothing to do with what system Clemson was running. They had better athletes. Especially at QB.

Think we should do that? Build our team and run a system that if/when we finally get on level recruiting with the OSU’s we can beat them? I’m not willing to wait until NEVER which is when our top to bottom roster will match Clemson, Bama, OSU etc.
I thought we learned this from 08-11. Or did we just need Casteel?

BigBlue02

April 16th, 2018 at 11:00 AM ^

Yeah but Clemson had the ball for 35 minutes because OSU’s defense couldn’t stop them. Your offense did suck, but the defense also sucked. You lost 31-0, not 3-0. Just because Clemson had a good offense, that doesn’t mean you also couldn’t have played shitty defense. They are not mutually exclusive

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

April 16th, 2018 at 1:31 PM ^

with more clarity than you - we definitely know the breaking point of a D from a shitty O. OSU’s D struggled in the first half (260 yards, 17 pts) more than the 2nd (210 yds, 14 pts). O tanked the whole game, D struggled frequently. As a UM fan, I can share your belief that the D was discouraged by the inept O and didn’t play to their potential. It demoralizes a D.