Rutgers expects to go 10-2
So I came across the wikipedia page for Rutgers' 2016 team, and apparently someone edited it to say that they win every reg season game (including Michigan) except Iowa and Ohio State, and they finish at No. 16 in the polls. Rutgers fans be confident, yo.
I screencap'd it here so y'all could see:
And here's the wikipedia page for as long as the edit stays as is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Rutgers_Scarlet_Knights_football_team
Frankly, I think this is hilarious. Maybe it's not worth the board's time and I'm about to get negbanged to Bolivia, but it gave me a chuckle and I wanted to share it before someone took the edit down. Hey, maybe Brian can use it as some humor/snark material for UV.
August 1st, 2016 at 12:53 PM ^
August 1st, 2016 at 12:55 PM ^
August 1st, 2016 at 12:58 PM ^
You know, I sort of have to hand it to Rutgers for being as energetic as they seem to be for this upcoming season. It means a fresh start, a new perspective and thus finding innovative ways to reach that 7-5 plateau by the 7th season of Ash's time at the helm, assuming they give him that long and Greg Schiano doesn't beg for his old job back or something. Every day, a little up. as they like to say in Continuous Improvement circles, or indeed at Rutgers, every day, a lot of uppers....also some stolen rims apparently.
Looking at that schedule they could be lucky to get 2 wins.
Go drunk, Rutgers, you're home.
Someone updated it so they lose to UM 33-0. That seems likelier.
apparently i have the ability to edit, I just fixed that to 150-0 UM
Someone who cares, edit it back to normal!
I think they got the numbers switched up. 2-10 is far more likely than 10-2. And considering that this prediction involves Rutgers making the BTT game against OSU (a team from within its own division), an Indiana team ranked # 17, and a ranked Maryland team, I'm not sure how seriously this is meant to be taken.
Good luck winning 4-5 games next year, fellas.
Thanks to whomever updated it. They will now lose to Michigan 33-0. Well done.
Now 150-0. Wasn't me BTW.
Now it's 700-0
Remind me again, who (or what) is Rutgers?
As in, Bob has one Rutger, Sam has four Rutgers, etc.
Sorry. Something got Rutgersed up there.
Someone changed the UM game to a L, 150-0. Nice work whoever that was.
<----- this guy
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Do they realize they have to play college teams?
fixed the OSU game also
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
thought i was being reasonable making it 150-0, someone just made it 700-0
good point
The Michigan game at Rutgers is 100 years and a day after this epic beatdown by none other than Coach Heisman:
2-10 is much more likely
Whoever had them beating OSU 2-0, that was hilarious.
Well done.
someone had made all the games losses, I had to update the OSU game back to a win
someone had made all the games losses, I had to update the OSU game back to a win
double upvote !!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
last year, they would have been blown out even more often. Dude was like the whole offense, it seemed.
I can't wait until they're 6-6.
I CONFIDENTLY predicted we'd go 10-3 in 2014 with narrow losses to ND, MSU & OSU but with a big New Years Day bowl win over an SEC team and that Hoke's fourth year would find us ranked inside the top 10 when the season was over.
So I guess everybody was laughing at me two years ago. It's tough to be an unbiased fan.
BUT COMONG MAN!
I'm gonna LOL so hard when RU loses to Howard and New Mexico!!!
nice
has been edited for Rutgers to go 8-3 with the game at Washington cancelled (?) but they beat UM 1,800,000 - 4.
Oh Rutgers fans, you're always good for a laugh
to realize if they're any good or not.
By October 9, it should be abundantly clear that 10-2 ain't happening in 2016
@Washington
@Iowa
Ohio State
Michigan
