Root against Oklahoma, leave nothing to chance

Submitted by VictorValiant on October 23rd, 2018 at 2:17 PM

John U. Bacon tweeted during the Purdue-OSU game, that it would be better for Michigan if OSU won. The numbers may actually show this. According to Nate Silver, Michigan does not fully control its destiny into the playoffs, even if winning out:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2018-college-football-predictions/

Leave nothing to chance, root for Oklahoma to lose a game!

CalifExile

October 23rd, 2018 at 3:38 PM ^

Wisconsin and PSU look less impressive every week. If OK beats Texas in their conference championship they've made up for their only loss. I swear, it's like people on this board haven't seen Michigan get screwed repeatedly over the years. From MSU voting to send OSU to the Rose Bowl to Charles White's phantom Rose Bowl TD to the coaches giving Osborne a National Championship as a going away present to the refs screwing us against OSU in 2016 (to pick just one random example), officials have screwed M at very opportunity. Given any cover at all, the smart money would be on Oklahoma being selected.

Mongo

October 23rd, 2018 at 4:16 PM ^

Who has OK played ?   And that loss to Texas?  Maryland beat Texas.  If both OK and UM win out, it will come down to who has the most quality wins ... that would be UM hands down.  Plus our only loss would be to the #3 ranked team - on the road, first game of the season, and UM was driving with a chance to win in the 4th quarter.   UM's SoS  >> OK's SoS

joeyb

October 23rd, 2018 at 3:11 PM ^

Sure there is. Bama, Clemson, Notre Dame, Michigan, Oklahoma, Washington State, and UCF all win out. Oklahoma gets a rematch against Texas in the conference championship, Michigan gets a 9-3 Purdue, WSU gets some other barely ranked team. Michigan and Oklahoma have similar records and resumes. Considering that they have two relatively equal teams, they decide to avoid a potential rematch and give the other team a shot. Or, they decide to pit 4 undefeated teams against each other and punt on the choice between 1-loss teams.

I don't think that's likely, but to say there is no way they leave us out is kind of ridiculous. Honestly, a situation like that is ideal for the future because it really pushes the issue of expanding the playoff to 6 or 8 teams.

Moonlight Graham

October 23rd, 2018 at 3:35 PM ^

If we win out, our consolation prize would be the Rose Bowl. What sucks is that if we were to lose in Columbus to a now 1-loss team rather than undefeated OSU, there was still a good chance the Rose would take us as the "second best" B1G team, and 12-0 OSU would go to the playoff. But with that Purdue loss, 11-1 OSU gets the Rose Bowl and no playoff.  

I also think we're guaranteed at least a NY6 bowl if we win the next 3. 

So, anyway Bacon is right ... but our floor is rising, too. 

Mongo

October 23rd, 2018 at 4:38 PM ^

We need to get rid of these conference title games and replace them with the 1st round of an 8 team playoff ... at neutral (domed) NFL sites.  Then you could get great match-ups ... instead of a OU vs Texas rematch and a UM vs Purdue or worse Wisconsin rematch, etc.

Using current AP standings as an illustrative precursor for the final CFP vote for round 1 of an 8 team playoff:

  • #1 Alabama  vs.  #8 Oklahoma ... Dallas
  • #2 Clemson  vs.  #7 Georgia ... Indy
  • #3 Notre Dame vs.  #6 Texas ... Atlanta
  • #4 LSU  vs.  #5 Michigan ... Houston

How cool would that be instead of these dorky re-match conference title games? 

TrueBlue2003

October 23rd, 2018 at 5:26 PM ^

I'm good with all that except...why neutral NFL sites?  Why not let the top 4 seeds host?

The best argument against expanding the playoff is that it would diminish the regular season, which is very true.  There would a lot of seasons in which the M-OSU game wouldn't even matter that much because both teams would likely have clinched a spot already (like 2016 and possibly this year).

So if you reward the top 4 spots with home field, at least those games would matter.  Attendance and atmosphere would be 1 million times better too.

rob f

October 23rd, 2018 at 8:04 PM ^

Winner! 

If the playoffs ever expand to 8, no way I want the opening round anywhere but in the homes of the top 4 seeds.  This would make every single game meaningful.

Can you imagine the outcry of Finebaum and the entire SEC if especially Bama and/or Georgia or any other SEC team had to venture north in mid-to-late December to play at the Big House?

FatGuyTouchdown

October 23rd, 2018 at 5:56 PM ^

If Alabama, Clemson, and notre Dame win out, that's 3/4. Basically would be Oklahoma and Michigan, and I think Michigan get's the nod.

What we really need to root for is either a Notre Dame loss, or Alabama to win out. Because a 1 loss Alabama is getting in. But if Alabama loses to Georgia in the SEC Title Game, and we have a 12-1 Bama, 12-1 Georgia, 13-0 Clemson, 12-0 Notre Dame, 12-1 Michigan and 12-1 Oklahoma, we could be in trouble. But that's unlikely as hell

Blue in Paradise

October 23rd, 2018 at 3:07 PM ^

This is the winner.  There is a zero chance that a 1 loss B1G champ named Michigan does not get into the playoff.

The committee will be drooling at the opportunity for Harbaugh + the insanely large and wealthy Michigan fan base + the insanely large number of other team's fans that hate Harbaugh/Michigan.  Like someone else said, it would be a ratings Grand Slam!  Not one committee member would turn down that chance.

We just need to beat PSU on Nov 3rd and continue our march towards Indy.  Nothing else matters.

Newton Gimmick

October 24th, 2018 at 5:20 PM ^

Yes -- win, and we're in.  I'd bet everything I own on it.

Texas is going to lose two more games, making that loss look worse.  Oklahoma's already been in the playoff twice, and couldn't get any stops on defense.  Harbaugh hasn't been in, and the Big Ten was left out last year.  A potential rematch with (possibly unbeaten) ND would add more juice.  No way Oklahoma's getting in over us.

Communist Football

October 23rd, 2018 at 7:57 PM ^

The OP is misunderstanding how the 538 model works. Michigan’s chances are effectively the chances of Michigan plus OSU plus Iowa (i.e. whoever can be a one-loss B1G champion). Same for Oklahoma and Texas. Basically, if we win out, we’re in, and the 538 model is predicting that there’s a 25% chance that we win out. 

UMProud

October 23rd, 2018 at 2:22 PM ^

We don't need any help...Nate Silver is wrong.  Selection committee would spooge at a chance to put Michigan in the CFP...best ratings in years

maizenblue92

October 23rd, 2018 at 2:23 PM ^

Which would most of you rather have?

Option 1: 12-2 with a playoff loss

Option 2: 13-1 and Rose Bowl Champions

Both scenarios include beating Ohio State and winning the Big Ten title. Genuinely curious about this.