Rich Rod article on SB Nation

Submitted by Decatur Jack on

LINK:

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/5/24/15667636/arizona-football-2017-preview-schedule-roster

Bill Connelly's preview of Arizona, titled,

The Arizona Wildcats are checking every box on the Program Collapse Checklist

Rodriguez fired Jeff Casteel. Greg Byrne (who hired RR) left to be the AD at Alabama. Rodriguez just went 3-9 in his 5th season at Arizona.

It's not looking good for the ol' Rich Rod.

BigBlue02

May 24th, 2017 at 10:09 PM ^

The history of Arizona football is not stellar. They don't have many conference titles in their history. Which is why I said RichRod was doing really well according to Arizona standards. Arizona schedule hasn't changed much since he took over, he's just one of the best coaches they've had in their shitty football history

Clarence Boddicker

May 25th, 2017 at 10:42 AM ^

Stanford was a hard gig but Harbaugh turned them into PAC 12 champs and a perennial power. That's what great coaches do. At the very least, UA should be better than middling if Rich Rod were truly an elite (or even great) coach. Arizona was actually pretty good back in the 90s with their Desert Swarm defense. They have some history to build on and California is Big enough to kick them better recruiting classes than they've seen. Oregon was far worse before their renaissance.

BigBlue02

May 25th, 2017 at 11:37 AM ^

Arizona wasn't pretty good in the 90s. They had one conference championship and had 3 years total with more than 7 wins. RichRod has already done that in his first 5 years at Arizona. He is arguably already one of the best coaches in their history. And I'm not sure why you are comparing him to Harbaugh. "Great coaches" don't turn Stanford into a perennial power-Harbaugh does. Harbaugh is one of the best coaches in football, college and the NFL. Saying that RichRod isn't a great coach because he hasn't turned Arizona into a football powerhouse is ridiculous

Clarence Boddicker

May 25th, 2017 at 2:51 PM ^

I guess great is bringing Arizona back to the level which you think still sucks. Because it's so hard to win at a PAC 12 school with great winter weather that's right next to Southern California and all the talent there. Just like it was hard at Michigan! And at West Virginia when Miami, VT, and BC were still in the Big East!

jimmyshi03

May 25th, 2017 at 1:39 PM ^

If Rich Rod has fallen prey to anything, it's to the ongoing history of U of A football (this was expanded upon on PAPN yesterday too). They get into the top 10 just as often as other mid-tier Pac 12 schools, but they rarely stay there (an injury happens they can't recover from, a bad loss turns into three losses, schedules catch upt o mediocre teams). Both Arizona schools lack the depth of talent available to the California schools, since they typically recruit in the same areas, and the state doesn't produce enough talent on its own to cover for that. 

lhglrkwg

May 24th, 2017 at 7:21 PM ^

Michigan men pass on the traditions of Michigan to our children and grandchildren. The victors, getting to the stadium early to watch the band take the field, seeing the team hit the banner, arguing about weather RichRod was a good coach, teaching them about what it is to be a Michigan man, etc.

Time honored traditions

IvyLeague

May 24th, 2017 at 7:11 PM ^

How some posters can take joy in Rich Rodriguez not succeeding. It didn't work for him here for a host of reasons and the Michigan program moved on. Even though it didn't work for him here, I'll never forget what he and his staff did for the Brock Mealer family. Wins and losses aside, it's actions off the field that define you as a person. I'd take the years of Rich Rod and Brady Hoke over any success Bama had during that time if we had a coach like Nick Saban. Thankfully, we have a coach now in Harbaugh who is a great person and can get us lots of wins. While he wasn't right for the Michigan job, I think Rich Rod is good person and a good leader of men. Didn't work out for him at Michigan but no reason for us not to root for him to succeed somewhere else.

Mocha Cub

May 24th, 2017 at 7:18 PM ^

I don't really buy your argument that you'd take the Rich Rod & Hoke years over having years like Alabama has had with Saban. You say Harbaugh is a great person, but ask a lot of other fanbases what they think of him and the picture isn't so rosy. Saban has given away a ton of his money through charitable donations and I think he has his own charity. I'm sure Bama fans think Saban is a great guy. It's all a matter of perspective. I think Urban Meyer is a gigantic snake-oil-selling-douchebag, but there are plenty of articles out there that indicate the contrary. 

stephenrjking

May 24th, 2017 at 10:26 PM ^

Yes.

We have legit gripes about the ethics of Bama. We resent them. Etc.

But they win. And anyone who doesn't they'd be 100% pro-Saban if he were here in that time period is absolutely nuts. Maybe we'd be suspicious that we weren't totally clean, but we'd talk ourselves out of it (I once talked to a very humble, reasonable, non-crazy Bama fan, and casually brought up the cheating. They were absolutely adamant that Bama was winning clean. You tell yourself these things, you have to). 

Saban probably wouldn't have won quite as many national titles here, but even if the performance is substantially lower (say, two) we're beating OSU 50% or more of the time, crushing MSU, winning titles? That would be the best era of Michigan football of my lifetime. Frankly, even a pay-for-play scandal couldn't erase it, sting though it would.

I'm glad our program tries to do things the right way. I'm glad we have Harbaugh. I wouldn't trade being a Michigan fan, even with the heartaches and disappointments, for anything.

But would I have loved what a Saban regime would have brought? 100% yes.

blue in dc

May 24th, 2017 at 7:25 PM ^

So much as it is evidence that while some of the excuses made for his failure to win as a coach at Michigan may have contributed to his lack of success, his actual skill as a head coach may also have been a bigger part of the problem than many of his supporters like to acknowledge. Lloyd Carr who did a great deal more from the program and was also a good man and a good leader of men has also taken significant grief on this site for many years after his coaching career ended. I would never feel compelled to start a thread pointing out current failures of past Michigan coaches, but I think I share the same disease that at least some other posters have and I can't resist the temptation to jump into the fray if someone else starts it.

jmblue

May 24th, 2017 at 9:40 PM ^

I was never comfortable with the way so many were eager to throw Carr under the bus to explain RR's failures.  I never thought that was fair to a man who served our athletic department 30 years, brought home a national title, made the College Football Hall of Fame, and was generally known as one of the good guys in the profession.

 

Whole Milk

May 25th, 2017 at 8:58 AM ^

Ahh the Lloyd Carr era, when people would criticize our consistent 9 win or better coach for not handling a lead as well as he probably should have or other football related notes instead of not being enough of a "Michigan Man". The good ole days. Thank god for Harbaugh. 

HonoluluBlue

May 24th, 2017 at 9:04 PM ^

Personally I enjoy RR's failures because for years I had to endure pencil pushing nerds who never played a competitive down of football in their life tell what a football genius he was. All he needed was a five years to get his recruits in and Jeff Casteel. How'd that work out. The RichRod sympathizers (Brian and LSAclassoff2000 are the biggest) will never admit they were wrong. What's not to love about some good old fashioned gloating and revelry in another man's failures?

FatGuyTouchdown

May 25th, 2017 at 9:16 AM ^

he IS a football genius. Almost every program uses Zone Read concepts, a play which Rodriguez literally invented. It's also fine to recognize that he's not a great coach anymore. Both can be true. 

Hal Mumme has been credited with modernizing the air raid in college football, and he's coaching Division 3. Pretty sure he's been fired from division 3 as well. Genius doesn't always make great.

Reader71

May 25th, 2017 at 9:31 AM ^

You could argue he stumbled upon an idea (that's his official story, with Shaun King recovering a fumble and going the wrong way) and never improved upon it much. How ironic that Coach Rod has become Mike DeBord. A once-fine coach who the sport has passed by.

FatGuyTouchdown

May 25th, 2017 at 11:36 AM ^

that it was a QB from Glenville State, not Shaun King. I will give him credit though, he took it and ran with it. He was able to see the mistake and make it a staple of the offense. You could argue that Rich Rodriguez revolutionized football more so than any other coach ever. 

I'm also a big Rich Rod fan. But I'm not going to sit here and pretend like he has been good since WVU. I do agree that he hasn't developed any new or unique concepts off of it, and the fact that so many teams run it now means that alot of teams know how to defend it, and that the scheme alone isnt going to win anymore. I would like to see Rich Rod end up as an OC somewhere, at a place like Alabama or Clemson, where he can focus solely on offense, and not on anything else.

corundum

May 25th, 2017 at 10:47 AM ^

I don't blame LSA and Brian one bit for being sympathizers at the time. It's easy to blast Rodriguez when hindsight is 20/20. At the time, we had recently been evicerated by Dennis Dixon, Vince Young, Troy Smith, and Armanti Edwards. Every time we played a spread team with a mobile QB it was a clusterfuck as we ran out plodding LBs tailor-made to defend the Wisconsins and Iowas of the Big Ten.It seemed like we were going to finally catch up to modern football. That obviously never happened, but it was an exciting sliver of hope for a brief moment in history.

ElBictors

May 24th, 2017 at 8:22 PM ^

Well perhaps he isn't the offensive genius he once was or was thought to be...?  Aside from WVU - where he should have stayed, in hindsight - he's been a relative failure.  At this point, even the "win 8 games/year" UA fans are starting to tire of him and the situation there was supposed to be "ideal" for his scheme - predictably perfect desert weather ...no Defense in the P-12 and a fan/alumni base that wasn't as "entitled" as we Wolverines.

Yet ...here he is, coming off a horrendous year with a fairly bad recruiting class and little optimism.

 

Maybe it's time for we Michigan fans to let it go on both sides -- those that still seem to relish in his failure, along with the apologists who still cry about him needing just "one more year with HIS players and system."

 

It is what it is.  GO BLUE and THANK GOD we've got Jim Harbaugh!!!!!

Goggles Paisano

May 25th, 2017 at 7:29 AM ^

I don't find it astounding at all.  People's feelings toward him are what they are and there is no changing that.  He may be a good human but he cratered this beloved program to a level unseen in our lifetime.  We lost to Toledo - at home!  Any time a RR topic shows up, the venom will flow from the majority as that is just how the majority honestly feels about him.  By now, this should be no surprise to anyone.