Request: Analysis of Coach Hoke's Gameday Coaching

Submitted by The team the t… on

SIAP....While it has been well established that Hoke poops gold, I was wondering if anyone has done an analysis of Hoke's gameday coaching?  I'd love to see a story on his strengths and weaknesses from his time as HC at Ball State and SDSU.   Maybe someone with more time on their hands could do a diary on issues such as:

  • clock management
  • half time adjustments
  • 4th down tendencies
  • how does he feel about punting from, say, the opponent's 35 yard line?
  • Game planning (predictable?)

I recall stories about schemes he has run, but that is not what I'm interested in.  I want to know what to expect from him on gameday.  

Mathlete!? 

Go Blue

jmblue

August 14th, 2011 at 3:32 PM ^

I don't know about some of those but he seems pretty willing to adapt his gameplan for the week's opponent, especially right off the bat.  In SDSU's bowl game, they went out of the gun about a third of the time overall, but the first drive was entirely shotgun-based.

MichiganPoloShirt

August 14th, 2011 at 3:35 PM ^

Off the top of my head I remember the last game he coached at sdsu....I'm not sure if it was because it was a bowl game but it seemed like the staff's playcalling was very aggressive on both sides of the ball. I don't think conservativeness is in coaches nature

PM

August 14th, 2011 at 7:01 PM ^

then it made me cry.  I love Lloyd and all but I sure hope Hoke doesn't call games the way Lloyd did when he had a lead (no matter how small) in the 2nd half.  Can you say bamboo slivers under your fingernails? Yeah, it was that much fun.

markusr2007

August 14th, 2011 at 8:32 PM ^

Stan Parrish as his OC (Ball State).

Wait, that wasn't a dream. It really happened.

So yeah, 34-38 at Ball State.

13-12 at SD State.

47-50 overall.

I am interested in the game day coaching analysis/preparation/play-calling too, but the final game results are also important.

 

 

 

cigol

August 15th, 2011 at 10:09 AM ^

His record is his record and that is indisputable. Nevertheless, we expect at least a seventh grader's level of analysis on this site. Going 47-50 at perennial losers is far far more impressive than even going 70-30 at historic juggernauts. In two seasons, hoke took one of the worst teams in the country and had them going toe to toe with nationally respectable teams. Harbaugh took an awful Stanford team and within 3 seasons had them crushing USC and playing with everybody on their schedule. In both instances (hoke after 2 & harbaugh after 3) their records were right at .500, but their work was very impressive.