Predicting this year's 3v14 upset

Submitted by Arb lover on

Every year we wonder what, (if any) high ranked team will go out in shame in the first round. No 16 seed has ever beaten a first seed, and seldom do we see a 15 seed prevail- though I would be remiss on this board if I did not point out the last time it occurred-

MSU was blown out by Middle Tennessee in 2016, 91-80.

Statistically, there has been a 3v14 upset every year over the last five years, so that is the more likely major upset if there is one. While 14v3 upsets were more rare prior to that, the 1986-1999 years saw 13 such upsets, so we may have begun a second such pattern. Here are the last five years 14 seed upsets below:

Year Loser (3 Seed) Winner (14 Seed) Score
2016 West Virginia Stephen F. Austin 70-56
2015 Baylor Georgia State 57-56
2015 Iowa State UAB 60-59
2014 Duke Mercer 78-71
2013 New Mexico Harvard 68-62

Who is most likely to be on this list? Who would you like to make this list?

As a side note both Duke and Michigan State are tied for the most number of major upsets, at 2 each, all recent, at 1x 2seed and 1x 3 seed each. Other winners of the failure awards below:

Teams tied for most 2+3 Seed losses        
Team 3 Seed Losses Lost To 2 Seed Losses Lost To
Michigan State 1995 Weber State 2016 Middle Tennessee
Duke 2014 Mercer 2012 Lehigh
Georgetown 2010 Ohio 2013 Florida Gulf Coast
Missouri 1990 Northern Iowa 2012 Norfolk State
Iowa State 2015 UAB 2001 Hampton
South Carolina 1998 Richmond 1997 Coppin State
Arizona 1992 East Tennesse State 1993 Santa Clara

Personally I would be happy if State chokes, simply because I don't believe they've earned their seed, and because other current events, but CBS' ranking system that has Texas Tech as most likely to fall as a 3 seed this year might not be wrong either. 

In case you are too bored to look at the matchups themselves, here's a chart of relative RPI strength between the 4 14 seeds vs their 3 seed opponents:

3v 14 seed RPI Pairings        
Team RPI Rank Team RPI Rank RPI Rank Difference
Tennessee 8 Wright State 99 91
Michigan 12 Montana 76 64
Michigan State 14 Bucknell 80 66
Texas Tech 23 Stephen F Austin 104 81


Here's hoping Michigan survives the curse of the 3. 

aiglick

March 14th, 2018 at 9:34 PM ^

I know RPI is flawed but at least by that ranking system the spreads between these teams aren’t that wide. Shows the difference from 1-2-3 seeds.

Indy Pete - Go Blue

March 14th, 2018 at 10:00 PM ^

They will all win, just like they did last year (2017 - not a part of the last 5 years?) There is no curse. Go to sleep, you won't want to forget 2018 like you seemed to forget 2017.  Big day tomorrow!

SFBlue

March 14th, 2018 at 9:46 PM ^

Michigan State did not earn its seed ? This is not the first time someone has posted something like this on the board. You all sound, to me, a lot like petty bellyaching pissant Sparties did after Michigan got the Sugar Bowl bid.

Let me make something very clear. Who the fuck cares what Sparty does. Who cares what they think. This obsession with Sparty voodoo is a distraction from Michigan’s accomplishments. Look, Sparty has a good team. That’s why beating them was fun. Let them make a good deep run. Right into us again, God willing. But mean spirited posts wishing ill onto Sparty is beneath us as a fan base. Goddammit.

jmblue

March 14th, 2018 at 9:47 PM ^

Here's hoping Michigan survives the curse of the 3.
This "curse" has only afflicted like 10-15% of 3 seeds since the field went to 64.

Andy213

March 14th, 2018 at 10:28 PM ^

Stone cold Stephen F Austin university is my pick. Also I really don't mind battle getting paid at Syracuse would have been nice but I like our team. 

bronxblue

March 14th, 2018 at 10:40 PM ^

Michigan is the most likely candidate based on the numbers, but gun to my head Texas Tech is the pick because they've gone 2-5 in their last 7.

J.

March 15th, 2018 at 12:25 AM ^

You really don't understand the first thing about statistics or randomness, do you? :-)

When in doubt, quote an Adam Sandler movie:  "[W]hat you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

This isn't to say that it's impossible that a 14 seed will win a game over the next two days.  But your reasoning is specious at best.  You have identified a pattern where none exists.

Blue in PA

March 15th, 2018 at 11:46 AM ^

I don't know about 3 v 14, 

 

But I'm the worlds biggest South Dakota State fan.... GO Jackrabbits!