htownwolverine

November 6th, 2011 at 11:39 AM ^

to my point. Being upset at the refs does not excuse bad play, playcalling, preparation. Hoping for a call from a ref at the end is a loser mentality. We should have won the game earlier or we might have won the game if our OC had run the best running QB in UM history from the 2.

I never said the word deserve in my entire post but go ahead and keep crying about the refs. Yes we were robbed but we put ourselves in that position.

MilkSteak

November 5th, 2011 at 5:22 PM ^

Yeah that was a bad call, but on 4th down with 2 seconds left, I would have rather seen a roll out for Denard to the right with a bunch of drags from the receivers/Koger. If the run's not there, throw it to the guy with the best chance at catching it. 

Anyway, those turnovers and a few bad calls really hurt us. Onward to Illinois!

hart4eva

November 5th, 2011 at 4:10 PM ^

Yeah, Denard doesn't have a great history on rollouts. I love Denard, but in my opinion, he works a lot from predetermined decisions. He's a running qb, but he's not necessarily a scrambling qb. If you roll him out, there's no guarantee that he tucks it and gets the TD. He could easily be sacked from hanging onto it too long or force it in somewhere for a bad pass because he's predetermined that it's a pass play.

2trublu

November 5th, 2011 at 3:33 PM ^

....didn't belong on a college football field. It was an absolutely atrociously called game, and Michigan bore the brunt of the ref's ineptitude.  But we put ourselves in a position for them to take it away from us.  Not saying we shouldn't complain, but I'm more concerned about our playcalling and clock management. 

That said - I hope none of those refs live close to a Michigan fan.

MGoNukeE

November 5th, 2011 at 3:33 PM ^

We need to pick this game apart play by play for every missed bad call, bad spot, and all the crap in this game. Then start a petition, get enough signatures and send it to ESPN, the NCAA, and the B10...

I want an explanation for this, these people are paid way too much money for this crap.

RickH

November 5th, 2011 at 3:37 PM ^

We played like absolute shit but we still had a chance to win the game, despite deserving to lose the game.  The refs obviously didn't help with this as there were three or four pass interference calls that either weren't called or called off.  Not to mentiom the refs set the mood for how they were going to call the game when Ferentz complained about the spot in the 1st quarter without reviewing it.

Overall, I'm disappointed in both our team and the officials.  Always sucks to lose a game because of the refs, even though we DID deserve to lose that game.

AmaizeingBlue

November 5th, 2011 at 3:35 PM ^

We need to pick this game apart play by play for every missed bad call, bad spot, and all the crap in this game. Then start a petition, get enough signatures and send it to ESPN, the NCAA, and the B10...

I want an explanation for this, these people are paid way too much money for this crap. 

SDCran

November 5th, 2011 at 3:37 PM ^

The worst thing about the 2nd down pass to me (besides the fact that it was completely clear it was a TD and should have been overturned, anyway), but the original call was not that the ball was juggled, it was the he was ob. 

There were 2 judegements to be made on that:

1) was he in bounds or not

2) did he maintain control

On the field, 1) was ruled out of bounds, and 2) was ruled a good catch.  1) was clearly wrong, and 2) apparently was ruled inconclusive.  Based on the original call, that would make the replay a TD. 

NOLA Wolverine

November 5th, 2011 at 6:03 PM ^

Everything is reviewed when they go into replay, not just the determining factor that the play was called on. When you catch the ball in the process of falling and end up sandwiching it between the ground and your chest you'll be hard pressed to get a replay official to say that you caught it. 

MGoBlue96

November 5th, 2011 at 6:10 PM ^

looking at the play from the right side of the endzone showed the ball and it was pretty clear from that angle that the ball didn't move and that the ball wasn't trapped.  The other angle, the one shown in that picture was inconclusive in that regard, but the other angle was pretty conclusive and should have been enough to overturn the call.

Blue99

November 5th, 2011 at 3:38 PM ^

Whiny bitches. Really everyone's gonna just bitch about the officiating not the fact that we came out flat as shit for 3 q's or we continue to destroy rhythm by alternating Gardner with the same worthless set of Demard decoy plays? So is everyone upset simply because all the garbage worthless talk putting the cart before the horse and trying to figure out how we could back door our way into Indy and the Rose Bowl will no longer be a way to spend the day in front of your computer at work? I thought this community was way better and way more sophisticated than this. Or is it just that anyone who voices dissent like me get banished to protect the thin skinned herd? Take all my points, enjoy em. God forbid someone want s people to look inside for a reality check and some soul searching.

JD_UofM_90

November 5th, 2011 at 5:04 PM ^

one thing stood out to me.  The uptempo / 2 minute offense seemed to work pretty good.  I know the coaching staff wanted to "protect" the defense at the beginning of the year by huddling on every play and slowing down the pace of the offense.  Now that our defense is performing at a higher level, why not go back to the "hurry up" offense once in a while during the course of a game, as a change of pace?

maizenbluenc

November 5th, 2011 at 3:38 PM ^

a) the officiating sucked, and lost us a chance to tie this game (not to mention the interference / pick at the end of the half)

b) the play calling ... wa happened? lost us this game

c) the team really seemed to come out flat

and

d) man I really miss Bo having a conniption when the officiating so obviously impacts the game this way. A little fire please coach.

DanRareEgg

November 5th, 2011 at 3:39 PM ^

I don't dispute that there were three PI calls not made (including one flag picked up for no apparent reason), but let's remember that on defense we allowed Coker to go for 132 yards and, outside of 2 sacks, pressured Vantolziendenhenneburg just once.  On offense we failed to adjust when they started shutting down Toussaint and Denard didn't give his receivers an opportunity to catch the ball on any of his deep throws.  He also failed to juke Binns out of his jock strap like he should have on several passes that were deflected.  The refs were unfortunately horrible, but the team again failed to match the opponent's intensity in a road game.  Hoke's got some work to do in that area.

Mannix

November 5th, 2011 at 3:39 PM ^

Seriously? Play calling sucked, DRob sucked and they didn't deserve this game. How hard is it? Sure, the Hemingway catch was a TD, but the ball was supposed to be a fade, not some horse crap throw to the middle of the endzone.

The slant is another horse crap call; where is the twirl route? Where is the run/pass option to the wide side of the field?

Sometimes I don't understand the play calls, the locking on of receivers and the stupid desire to make DRob a pocket QB.

 

AAB

November 5th, 2011 at 3:42 PM ^

but Michigan outgained Iowa on the day (not by much, but they did).  Acting like Michigan was clearly outplayed and didn't deserve to win is wrong.